すみれ

すみれ — CS2 Stats

CO76561198168775710[U:1:208509982]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,437Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
4,715Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,733Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13421 of 221127 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,437 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 68 days played since 20 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,733 +1,089 20 Mar7 Sept · 25 days played
24,64427,462peak 27,46220 Mar7 Sept
27,506Peak Premier in tracked matches
68Days played since 2026-03-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,729 below peak (27,462)
  • +156 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,167 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,267 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate47.4%46.8%48.3%meets
Shot accuracy10.4%13.0%13.2%2.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.141.061.07above
Match win rate44.2%46.3%46.9%2.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGすみれFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,733 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning59
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49438Last 10049%Win rateLWWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · +42ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility4.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.9
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time558ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 26.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.43Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 29 Jun
59%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 22 May
359msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · nuke, 13 Jul
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 5 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 89% over 9infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC26101638%0.03
mirageC1881044%0.01
cacheC156940%0.05
ancientA138562%0.04
dust2S98189%0.02
anubisS75271%0.02
infernoD71614%0.10
sanctum32167%0.13
vertigo110100%0.12
poseidon1010%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

160,832Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7,088Matches
44.2%Match win rate
47.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
10.4%Shot accuracy
25,130MVPs
3,535Hours (in match)
5,295Bombs planted
4,325Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4746,731
AWP22,840
P2504,987
Tec-93,003

Lifetime map wins

10,436dust2
8,777inferno
4,604nuke
4,015vertigo
3,090cbble
2,766train
541lake
474office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

239Matches
56%Win rate
1.70Avg K/D
97.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2176%1.8821.9
Mirage1937%2.1622.7
Inferno1560%1.6420.8
Ancient1479%3.7525.2
Dust21242%1.6220.5
Nuke1283%2.8322.8
Train1100%2.1021.0
Overpass10%0.8713.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.9%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
551msReaction time
40.8%T opening success
41.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
10.9%Flash assists
7.24HE damage / grenade
7.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient1–130.0113%4 Sept
dust213–5-0.0720%30 Aug
anubis13–20.0322%27 Aug
mirage8–130.0214%26 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0614%25 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0231%25 Aug
mirage0–20.0233%25 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0432%23 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0434%23 Aug
ancient13–110.0115%18 Aug
ancient13–50.0522%17 Aug
nuke8–130.0622%6 Aug
dust213–0-0.0431%5 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0415%5 Aug
mirage13–20.0127%4 Aug
cache13–30.0817%3 Aug
ancient13–50.0316%2 Aug
dust211–130.0120%1 Aug
dust213–80.1619%31 Jul
mirage3–130.0119%31 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0217%31 Jul
cache8–130.0527%26 Jul
dust213–10.0547%26 Jul
mirage10–40.0117%26 Jul
ancient13–60.0331%26 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0312%24 Jul
ancient13–100.0326%22 Jul
cache12–120.0222%16 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0226%15 Jul
nuke7–130.0034%13 Jul
nuke13–40.0127%13 Jul
nuke6–130.0028%12 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0416%12 Jul
nuke5–130.0318%12 Jul
cache13–100.1539%12 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0033%12 Jul
nuke8–130.0623%11 Jul
nuke13–100.0723%11 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0118%10 Jul
nuke5–20.0620%9 Jul
nuke6–130.009%8 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0321%8 Jul
nuke13–80.0619%7 Jul
nuke13–70.0519%7 Jul
nuke13–110.0720%6 Jul
nuke8–130.0215%1 Jul
vertigo9–50.1231%29 Jun
nuke7–9-0.0733%29 Jun
inferno9–10.4336%29 Jun
poseidon2–9-0.1245%26 Jun
mirage13–60.0930%26 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0234%4 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0232%4 Jun
anubis2–130.0033%1 Jun
mirage6–130.0127%29 May
sanctum6–9-0.0323%28 May
sanctum9–20.1330%28 May
nuke13–110.0222%28 May
nuke3–130.1359%22 May
inferno8–80.1127%19 May
sanctum9–20.2819%19 May
mirage12–120.0626%17 May
cache8–130.0127%11 May
nuke13–40.1336%10 May
nuke8–130.0731%10 May
cache13–40.0325%10 May
cache13–90.1326%9 May
cache4–130.0414%8 May
cache13–20.0925%7 May
cache5–13-0.0224%6 May
cache11–13-0.0036%5 May
cache6–13-0.0021%5 May
cache12–12-0.0031%4 May
cache13–60.1626%3 May
cache12–120.0638%29 Apr
dust213–70.0148%25 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0222%24 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0112%24 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0339%23 Apr
dust213–50.0526%23 Apr
mirage10–130.0518%22 Apr
mirage13–2-0.0119%22 Apr
anubis16–120.0325%21 Apr
mirage16–14-0.0323%20 Apr
dust26–20.0340%19 Apr
anubis13–30.0517%18 Apr
inferno10–130.0818%11 Apr
ancient13–100.1132%10 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0623%9 Apr
nuke13–20.1032%8 Apr
ancient13–40.1516%1 Apr
ancient13–30.1332%31 Mar
anubis13–70.0837%30 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0213%28 Mar
inferno8–80.2322%27 Mar
dust213–80.0150%24 Mar
mirage4–130.0231%24 Mar
ancient15–150.0825%23 Mar
mirage7–130.0722%20 Mar
mirage13–40.0220%20 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →