tsukiles

tsukiles — CS2 Stats

PS76561198168730716[U:1:208464988]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

364Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,799Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.2 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,366 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 14 Apr 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,500 -193 14 Apr27 May · 10 days played
15,00016,609peak 16,60914 Apr27 May
16,609Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,366Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2025-04-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,366
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 165 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-23
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,280), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate44.2%45.7%46.8%2.6% short
Shot accuracy14.7%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.931.051.060.13 short
Match win rate44.1%45.7%46.3%2.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtsukilesFACEITLevel 7 · 1,366 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,366csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning32
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47467Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLLWTTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 10

  • 262 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 7112 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim4.3
Utility4.1
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning3.2
Utility4.1
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact2.6

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time581ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 21 Apr
39%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · inferno, 20 Apr
375msFastest reaction time · 6–9 · inferno, 20 Apr
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 21 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C26111542%-0.01
infernoD124833%-0.02
ancientA116555%-0.03
nukeA106460%-0.03
mirageA95456%-0.03
overpassS65183%-0.01
trainD62433%-0.03
vertigoC52340%0.02
anubisA53260%0.01
cache31233%-0.01
jura21150%-0.04
rooftop110100%0.10
office1010%-0.05
grail1010%-0.02
palais1010%-0.11
basalt1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

43,816Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
2,431Matches
44.1%Match win rate
44.2%Headshot %
14.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
6,220MVPs
942Hours (in match)
1,905Bombs planted
594Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,409dust2
2,958inferno
1,047train
987nuke
923vertigo
717cbble
157office
107assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

164Matches
56%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
72.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21963%1.1114.6
Mirage1450%0.8212.4
Overpass1369%1.0115.4
Ancient1155%1.0514.7
Nuke989%1.1815.0
Train956%1.0116.3
Anubis771%1.8916.1
Inferno633%0.9412.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
25.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.4%Spray accuracy
71.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
607msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
32.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
8.26HE damage / grenade
10.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.9779% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–13-0.048%9 Sept
dust29–13-0.0424%25 Jul
dust213–7-0.0324%24 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0617%24 Jul
dust26–13-0.0520%24 Jul
vertigo10–130.0826%21 Jul
cache13–40.0018%20 Jul
cache12–120.0511%20 Jul
dust212–12-0.0314%20 Jul
mirage1–13-0.1113%19 Jul
cache14–16-0.0823%18 Jul
inferno0–13-0.060%18 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0526%18 Jul
nuke13–100.0518%12 Jul
dust213–40.0021%12 Jul
dust211–13-0.0730%30 Nov
nuke6–13-0.0527%30 Nov
vertigo6–13-0.0525%26 Oct
dust213–110.0220%22 Oct
inferno9–20.0913%16 Oct
inferno8–80.1011%16 Oct
ancient13–9-0.0722%16 Oct
rooftop9–60.1027%16 Oct
mirage13–10-0.0322%15 Oct
nuke4–9-0.1033%14 Oct
vertigo9–40.0427%14 Oct
inferno6–9-0.029%14 Oct
ancient3–13-0.0724%11 Oct
dust213–10-0.0112%11 Oct
overpass13–4-0.0523%11 Oct
dust24–13-0.0123%30 Sept
ancient9–130.0124%30 Sept
office4–13-0.057%27 Sept
dust213–80.0618%27 Sept
dust213–10-0.0833%27 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0511%27 Sept
overpass13–70.0414%26 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0225%24 Sept
train12–12-0.0523%23 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0524%21 Sept
dust210–13-0.0119%21 Sept
grail9–13-0.0210%18 Sept
inferno13–60.0114%18 Sept
mirage13–90.0215%18 Sept
dust213–8-0.0818%18 Sept
jura13–6-0.0222%18 Sept
overpass13–80.0229%17 Sept
overpass13–10-0.0015%16 Sept
overpass13–11-0.0817%15 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0314%8 Sept
train13–4-0.0433%5 Jun
jura3–13-0.0516%27 May
nuke13–3-0.0113%27 May
dust26–130.0932%27 May
dust210–13-0.0213%1 May
vertigo13–60.0420%30 Apr
nuke13–100.0022%29 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0020%29 Apr
dust213–10-0.0424%29 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0515%26 Apr
dust211–130.0130%26 Apr
anubis13–3-0.0517%25 Apr
mirage13–90.0124%25 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0220%25 Apr
dust212–120.0621%21 Apr
train13–50.0236%21 Apr
overpass6–130.0020%21 Apr
train3–13-0.0331%21 Apr
nuke3–13-0.1110%21 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0526%21 Apr
train8–13-0.0423%21 Apr
mirage13–70.0317%21 Apr
ancient2–13-0.108%21 Apr
anubis13–10.1314%21 Apr
anubis13–90.0123%20 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0039%20 Apr
ancient13–70.049%20 Apr
inferno6–9-0.086%20 Apr
vertigo8–8-0.0322%20 Apr
inferno9–5-0.0815%20 Apr
palais7–9-0.118%20 Apr
dust28–13-0.064%20 Apr
inferno13–16-0.0127%20 Apr
train10–13-0.0319%19 Apr
basalt3–13-0.027%19 Apr
dust213–60.0422%19 Apr
anubis2–13-0.0814%19 Apr
anubis10–130.0310%16 Apr
dust215–150.0319%16 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0717%16 Apr
mirage13–80.0123%16 Apr
dust213–20.068%16 Apr
inferno9–13-0.092%16 Apr
nuke9–10.0619%16 Apr
ancient13–10.0923%16 Apr
dust213–16-0.0123%15 Apr
dust27–13-0.0317%15 Apr
ancient8–13-0.029%15 Apr
dust213–9-0.0810%14 Apr
dust210–13-0.0511%14 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →