STENHÅRD

STENHÅRD — CS2 Stats

US76561198167363471[U:1:207097743]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

247Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,060Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,000Blue band · top ~54.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 26 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,000 +2,496 3 Jun8 Sept · 18 days played
6,67710,106peak 10,1063 Jun8 Sept
10,106Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-05-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 106 below peak (10,106)
  • +1,360 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,851 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate37.3%42.7%43.8%6.5% short
Shot accuracy13.7%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.071.001.02above
Match win rate39.7%43.9%44.7%5.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSTENHÅRDFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER10,000 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim35
Positioning63
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40555Last 10040%Win rateLLLWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim3.5
Utility4.4
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 62% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 57% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.5
Positioning6.3
Utility4.4
Mechanics1.6
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time597ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy13.0%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.35Best match rating · 9–0 · poseidon, 19 Aug
39%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · poseidon, 19 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 2–8 · anubis, 18 Aug
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 12 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L3Current streak
94In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 8mirageWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2491538%0.01
infernoC156940%0.05
mirageD1441029%-0.02
anubisB136746%0.01
dust2B84450%-0.02
cacheB63350%0.01
ancientC52340%0.00
vertigo43175%0.03
office31233%0.01
debris3030%-0.13
fachwerk21150%0.05
overpass2020%-0.07
poseidon110100%0.35

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,435Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
1,480Matches
39.7%Match win rate
37.3%Headshot %
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3,689MVPs
570Hours (in match)
935Bombs planted
233Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,499dust2
925nuke
888inferno
402vertigo
310office
213cbble
138train
79lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

64Matches
50%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
82.2ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2458%1.3016.5
Mirage1540%1.1517.5
Nuke1354%1.1415.0
Vertigo475%1.1615.5
Ancient450%0.8910.3
Inferno20%0.9518.5
Dust210%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.5%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
57.1%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
587msReaction time
48.0%T opening success
43.4%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
7.98HE damage / grenade
10.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0584° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.4527% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4219 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–130.0117%9 Sept
office8–130.0113%9 Sept
ancient6–13-0.044%8 Sept
ancient13–110.0411%8 Sept
mirage13–110.0710%8 Sept
fachwerk13–100.0716%7 Sept
fachwerk8–130.047%7 Sept
inferno9–40.2413%7 Sept
inferno6–13-0.005%6 Sept
dust29–13-0.056%4 Sept
vertigo9–70.057%4 Sept
nuke10–60.037%4 Sept
mirage13–16-0.019%4 Sept
dust21–13-0.0220%4 Sept
vertigo11–13-0.038%3 Sept
vertigo13–50.0617%2 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0713%1 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0710%1 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0411%1 Sept
mirage13–80.008%31 Aug
nuke8–30.0922%31 Aug
mirage11–13-0.1222%30 Aug
cache16–130.0414%29 Aug
nuke13–110.0216%29 Aug
anubis7–130.0515%29 Aug
nuke4–130.0315%29 Aug
anubis13–50.0711%29 Aug
nuke12–120.0523%29 Aug
overpass8–8-0.0322%29 Aug
inferno9–50.0521%29 Aug
dust213–110.0011%29 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0811%28 Aug
nuke12–160.0014%28 Aug
vertigo9–40.0411%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.088%26 Aug
dust216–14-0.0420%26 Aug
mirage13–80.0719%26 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0322%26 Aug
nuke13–11-0.047%26 Aug
inferno9–20.3012%26 Aug
inferno9–60.108%26 Aug
mirage1–100.035%26 Aug
dust213–9-0.0116%20 Aug
cache13–10-0.0419%20 Aug
inferno2–40.1810%19 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0320%19 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1511%19 Aug
nuke3–9-0.0111%19 Aug
overpass3–9-0.110%19 Aug
poseidon9–00.3539%19 Aug
debris2–9-0.110%18 Aug
anubis2–80.0817%18 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0338%18 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0836%18 Aug
nuke13–1-0.0315%18 Aug
inferno9–130.0431%17 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0710%15 Aug
cache5–13-0.0810%15 Aug
debris3–9-0.1513%15 Aug
dust29–13-0.0324%15 Aug
office12–12-0.056%14 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0218%14 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0622%14 Aug
mirage2–13-0.054%13 Aug
anubis16–130.0113%13 Aug
inferno13–00.2317%12 Aug
ancient10–130.0520%1 Aug
cache6–20.1110%1 Aug
nuke10–130.0318%1 Aug
dust28–130.0224%1 Aug
ancient13–20.024%31 Jul
inferno9–130.0520%31 Jul
nuke13–70.1020%26 Jul
anubis13–9-0.035%26 Jul
mirage5–130.0219%26 Jul
dust213–11-0.0414%26 Jul
nuke13–60.169%26 Jul
nuke10–130.0321%20 Jul
nuke13–10.138%20 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0313%20 Jul
cache10–13-0.0124%11 Jul
anubis13–20.0614%11 Jul
cache8–130.0815%8 Jul
debris2–9-0.1216%8 Jul
mirage10–130.0010%28 Jun
nuke13–110.0016%28 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0114%18 Jun
mirage1–13-0.110%18 Jun
anubis10–13-0.019%17 Jun
inferno13–60.0124%5 Jun
ancient8–13-0.074%5 Jun
inferno6–9-0.235%5 Jun
anubis4–130.057%4 Jun
nuke7–130.0619%4 Jun
anubis13–60.0717%4 Jun
nuke8–130.0321%3 Jun
mirage13–60.026%3 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0215%28 May
nuke8–8-0.1414%28 May
office13–100.0613%26 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →