levywoo

levywoo — CS2 Stats

RO76561198166720348[U:1:206454620]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

701Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,460Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,304), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate49.6%50.9%
Shot accuracy16.1%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.061.09
Match win rate48.6%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlevywooFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning61
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–53–1Last 10046%Win rateWWWLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +9.6pp headshot accuracy · +82ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 703ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 691ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility6.3
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning6.1
Utility6.3
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time636ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy25.9%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating · 9–4 · poseidon, 28 May →
59%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 27 Dec →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 9 Jan →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 19 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
4–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 20infernoWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2915–1452%0.03
dust2A2012–860%0.00
anubisB1910–953%-0.01
ancientD133–1023%0.02
infernoD81–713%0.00
cacheD62–433%0.01
nuke—21–150%-0.08
poseidon—11–0100%0.30
train—11–0100%0.03
vertigo—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

116,214Lifetime kills
1.06K/D
4,600Matches
48.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players
49.6%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players
12,198MVPs
2,229Hours (in match)
4,441Bombs planted
1,418Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4749,504
AWP14,912
Knife2,767
P2502,732
UMP-451,609

Lifetime map wins

4,602dust2
4,414inferno
2,470cbble
1,447nuke
1,445train
184vertigo
67lake
67safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,242Matches
54%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
86.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust214751%1.2217.4
Mirage12250%1.1817.5
Anubis12258%1.3317.7
Ancient10550%1.2418.1
Inferno5545%1.3219.8
Cache3266%1.3720.2
Nuke560%1.3618.4
Vertigo475%1.1815.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
86.0%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
635msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
8.92HE damage / grenade
19.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.1011% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–7-0.0435%2 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0121%2 Oct →
dust213–60.0128%2 Oct →
mirage15–19-0.0135%16 Aug →
inferno6–130.0128%14 Jul →
anubis13–60.0633%3 Jul →
mirage13–60.1230%18 Jun →
cache2–13-0.0120%4 Jun →
cache13–40.0318%4 Jun →
nuke1–9-0.2350%28 May →
poseidon9–40.3044%28 May →
anubis13–5-0.0216%27 May →
mirage13–10-0.0223%24 May →
nuke13–90.0618%24 May →
dust25–13-0.0713%23 May →
cache14–160.0216%22 May →
dust216–19-0.069%20 May →
dust213–8-0.0421%20 May →
dust219–17-0.0323%10 May →
dust213–8-0.0220%3 May →
dust216–140.0115%2 May →
mirage13–100.0420%2 May →
cache10–13-0.0720%1 May →
cache11–130.1332%30 Apr →
dust213–90.0718%29 Apr →
inferno6–130.0458%27 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0422%24 Apr →
dust211–130.0120%23 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0232%20 Apr →
mirage13–20.2143%19 Apr →
dust213–70.0017%17 Apr →
mirage10–130.0630%13 Apr →
mirage3–130.0029%6 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.0421%29 Mar →
dust213–60.0318%18 Jan →
mirage6–130.0520%24 Oct →
ancient9–130.0127%25 Sept →
mirage13–70.1229%25 Sept →
dust211–130.0135%20 Jan →
dust213–80.0621%20 Jan →
anubis9–130.0133%14 Jan →
mirage13–40.1122%12 Jan →
anubis13–60.0517%9 Jan →
dust29–00.1140%28 Dec →
inferno11–13-0.0023%27 Dec →
ancient12–120.0122%27 Dec →
mirage1–13-0.0619%27 Dec →
dust210–13-0.0259%27 Dec →
ancient1–130.0122%27 Dec →
dust217–190.0228%20 Dec →
anubis5–13-0.0811%19 Dec →
dust213–20.1133%18 Dec →
dust210–13-0.0630%16 Dec →
mirage6–13-0.0036%16 Dec →
train13–50.0336%15 Dec →
inferno7–13-0.0433%8 Nov →
mirage13–8-0.0625%1 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0735%1 Nov →
mirage7–10.2648%8 Jul →
anubis13–100.0613%10 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0922%10 Mar →
ancient4–130.0223%10 Mar →
anubis13–30.0930%10 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0514%9 Mar →
inferno13–100.0629%9 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0319%9 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0524%9 Mar →
mirage13–100.0332%6 Mar →
ancient13–50.078%5 Mar →
anubis13–16-0.0125%5 Mar →
ancient9–130.1120%5 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0811%5 Mar →
ancient13–16-0.0126%5 Mar →
ancient13–90.0321%4 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0631%4 Mar →
anubis13–70.0333%4 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0317%3 Mar →
anubis13–90.0038%3 Mar →
inferno10–130.0319%3 Mar →
mirage13–110.0525%3 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0637%3 Mar →
ancient2–13-0.0314%3 Mar →
mirage13–9-0.0131%3 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0415%3 Mar →
mirage13–40.0620%3 Mar →
mirage12–160.0534%2 Mar →
mirage13–7-0.0832%2 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.1016%2 Mar →
mirage14–160.0031%2 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0116%1 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.0219%29 Feb →
anubis16–12-0.0222%29 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0523%27 Feb →
inferno19–22-0.0521%27 Feb →
ancient10–130.0337%26 Feb →
mirage13–70.1130%26 Feb →
vertigo14–160.0129%26 Feb →
mirage17–190.0438%26 Feb →
ancient13–100.0323%26 Feb →
ancient8–130.0235%26 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.