TaMo

TaMo — CS2 Stats

76561198163922142[U:1:203656414]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,547Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,050Top 50% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53696 of 252099 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 885 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,050 +4,484 28 Aug – 1 Oct · 17 days played
17,56622,450peak 22,45028 Aug1 Oct
Faceit ELO: 885 +0 28 Aug – 19 Sept · 4 observations
885885peak 88528 Aug19 Sept
22,570Peak Premier in tracked matches
885Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 885
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 16 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 400 below peak (22,450)
  • +3,460 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,950 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTaMoFACEITLevel 4 · 885 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER22,050 · Pink bandPEAK ELO885csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning55
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–41–7Last 10052%Win rateWWTWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.08 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +61ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.5
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time612ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 2 Oct →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 3 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · mirage, 3 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
12–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3012–1840%-0.00
infernoS2215–768%0.05
mirageA1610–663%-0.02
nukeC135–838%0.02
cacheC94–544%0.01
ancientS75–271%0.00
anubis—20–20%-0.09
overpass—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
45%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
90.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
62%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1362%1.2516.9
Dust2838%1.2918.4
Cache367%1.2317.7
Nuke250%1.2419.5
Anubis250%1.1215.5
Inferno20%1.1618.5
Overpass10%1.8626.0
Ancient1100%1.4413.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.6%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
617msReaction time
51.2%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
4.98HE damage / grenade
10.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–100.0113%14 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.0223%14 Oct →
nuke8–80.058%14 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.0313%14 Oct →
nuke7–90.0714%14 Oct →
inferno9–60.0427%12 Oct →
nuke5–90.0118%12 Oct →
nuke9–7-0.006%12 Oct →
dust27–130.1027%9 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0419%8 Oct →
nuke12–120.0411%8 Oct →
inferno9–40.2421%7 Oct →
nuke9–30.0915%7 Oct →
cache6–20.0326%3 Oct →
cache7–130.0524%3 Oct →
inferno9–70.0710%2 Oct →
inferno9–20.2316%2 Oct →
inferno9–10.2618%2 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0122%2 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.036%2 Oct →
cache3–13-0.027%2 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0512%2 Oct →
inferno6–130.0411%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0227%1 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0917%1 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.0121%1 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0016%1 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0124%30 Sept →
nuke8–80.1112%30 Sept →
nuke6–9-0.0016%30 Sept →
inferno6–90.1216%30 Sept →
dust213–70.0116%29 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.123%29 Sept →
mirage13–30.0227%29 Sept →
dust27–13-0.048%29 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0624%29 Sept →
cache13–110.0415%29 Sept →
dust213–9-0.019%28 Sept →
inferno9–130.0510%28 Sept →
dust212–120.0217%28 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0121%27 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0114%27 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0214%27 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0517%25 Sept →
overpass9–7-0.0115%23 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0010%23 Sept →
inferno13–80.0827%23 Sept →
dust28–130.0224%23 Sept →
mirage13–90.0212%22 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0918%22 Sept →
dust213–110.0322%22 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0519%22 Sept →
dust212–120.0122%22 Sept →
inferno13–70.0324%21 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.096%21 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0921%21 Sept →
mirage13–50.0419%21 Sept →
inferno13–90.0322%21 Sept →
dust27–130.0120%21 Sept →
ancient13–20.0632%20 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0012%20 Sept →
inferno13–110.0812%19 Sept →
dust23–130.0418%19 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0223%17 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0613%17 Sept →
mirage13–110.0224%17 Sept →
ancient9–130.0212%16 Sept →
anubis0–5-0.0522%16 Sept →
nuke6–3-0.0514%16 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.007%16 Sept →
mirage13–60.0110%15 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0516%15 Sept →
nuke13–70.0510%14 Sept →
dust213–40.0322%14 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0613%14 Sept →
dust213–110.0929%13 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0021%13 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0422%11 Sept →
dust212–120.0223%11 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0320%11 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0315%11 Sept →
dust213–70.0115%11 Sept →
inferno13–70.007%9 Sept →
dust213–80.0828%9 Sept →
dust24–11-0.0721%9 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0224%8 Sept →
nuke8–30.0132%8 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0316%8 Sept →
dust213–20.1114%7 Sept →
ancient13–60.0431%7 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0729%7 Sept →
ancient13–1-0.0217%7 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0611%5 Sept →
ancient13–110.0319%5 Sept →
inferno13–40.0118%5 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0129%4 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0312%4 Sept →
dust213–30.0126%4 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0314%4 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0237%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.