Norbert

Norbert — CS2 Stats

HU76561198163614411[U:1:203348683]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

847Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,491Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+5Tracked matches · now 847
+5.2ppWin rate · 44.8% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 18 May 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,684 -428 23 Dec4 Jul · 10 days played
18,64320,119peak 20,11923 Dec4 Jul
20,119Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2025-05-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches6
Win rate33%
K/D0.62
Headshot %66%

Measured 11 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate36.4%42.7%43.8%7.4% short
Shot accuracy14.0%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.631.001.020.39 short
Match win rate31.2%43.9%44.7%13.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNorbertFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning44
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45496Last 10045%Win rateLWWLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +7.3pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility3.4
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning4.4
Utility3.4
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time619ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 12 Jan
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · inferno, 11 Sept
438msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 19 Dec
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 12 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA28171161%-0.02
dust2B24111346%-0.04
infernoD1551033%-0.03
ancientA117464%-0.01
nukeB63350%0.01
anubisD6060%-0.01
cache41325%-0.01
overpass31233%0.01
shelter1010%0.06
vertigo1010%-0.07
train1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

80,783Lifetime kills
0.63K/D
5,202Matches
31.2%Match win rate
36.4%Headshot %
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
7,346MVPs
1,936Hours (in match)
3,798Bombs planted
586Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,839
AWP13,469
Knife1,998
P901,960
UMP-451,944
FAMAS1,732

Lifetime map wins

5,849dust2
5,061inferno
1,562nuke
1,347vertigo
697train
670office
490cbble
173lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

27Matches
48%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
79.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
75%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno367%1.0118.3
Dust22100%0.9514.5
Mirage250%0.7612.0
Anubis1100%1.6418.0
Nuke10%0.5910.0
Ancient10%0.8315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
610msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
7.82HE damage / grenade
4.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4023 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.8594% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.0418%11 Sept
nuke13–110.0322%11 Sept
ancient13–60.0319%11 Sept
inferno0–3-0.0850%11 Sept
nuke6–130.0516%3 Sept
shelter9–130.0613%3 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0319%23 Jul
dust213–8-0.0727%20 Jul
mirage13–20.0119%20 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0515%12 Jul
dust25–13-0.079%12 Jul
cache13–70.0412%12 Jul
mirage13–10.0511%12 Jul
mirage10–13-0.098%9 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0117%4 Jul
dust213–100.0423%4 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0524%4 Jul
mirage13–6-0.079%4 Jul
dust213–11-0.0419%4 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0113%27 Jun
dust29–13-0.0912%14 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0510%14 Jun
dust24–13-0.0515%14 Jun
dust216–140.0118%2 Jun
dust216–13-0.0313%17 May
mirage13–8-0.044%16 May
inferno3–13-0.0517%13 May
anubis9–13-0.0510%13 May
inferno1–9-0.208%3 May
inferno5–9-0.0012%3 May
inferno4–90.0118%3 May
cache5–130.0010%30 Apr
cache7–130.018%30 Apr
cache8–13-0.0822%29 Apr
anubis15–150.058%27 Apr
ancient7–130.0441%27 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0315%26 Apr
overpass13–60.1118%26 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0719%19 Mar
dust213–10-0.0216%15 Mar
inferno16–13-0.0410%11 Mar
dust214–16-0.0517%8 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0020%2 Mar
dust213–110.0110%1 Feb
anubis2–13-0.106%1 Feb
inferno11–13-0.047%24 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0120%24 Jan
inferno13–110.0423%12 Jan
nuke13–60.1521%12 Jan
mirage8–13-0.069%8 Jan
inferno13–6-0.0118%8 Jan
ancient13–80.0111%8 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0810%8 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0318%6 Jan
dust23–13-0.1019%27 Dec
ancient6–130.0123%26 Dec
inferno9–130.0117%26 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0323%25 Dec
mirage5–130.0221%25 Dec
overpass7–13-0.0117%24 Dec
mirage10–130.0510%24 Dec
mirage13–7-0.009%23 Dec
ancient13–11-0.025%23 Dec
dust213–60.0315%23 Dec
dust23–13-0.0813%23 Dec
inferno7–13-0.038%22 Dec
ancient13–7-0.0318%22 Dec
mirage13–60.0520%22 Dec
nuke13–11-0.027%22 Dec
dust26–13-0.0420%19 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0510%19 Dec
mirage16–12-0.0415%15 Dec
mirage13–6-0.0117%14 Dec
ancient5–13-0.0332%28 Oct
overpass3–13-0.0938%28 Oct
mirage13–11-0.0325%12 Oct
ancient13–5-0.0016%12 Oct
dust213–7-0.0421%7 Sept
mirage5–12-0.0421%7 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0610%23 Jul
mirage9–130.0212%22 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0416%20 Jul
mirage13–50.0526%19 Jul
vertigo12–12-0.079%19 Jul
inferno13–7-0.038%2 Jul
dust25–13-0.0529%2 Jul
dust27–13-0.0917%30 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0418%30 Jun
mirage13–3-0.057%14 Jun
dust212–12-0.0611%14 Jun
train12–12-0.0216%13 Jun
mirage13–90.0028%13 Jun
dust213–60.0412%13 Jun
inferno13–20.0225%13 Jun
anubis12–120.1024%10 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0814%30 May
dust28–13-0.0819%30 May
dust26–13-0.0914%25 May
mirage10–13-0.0015%18 May
dust213–90.0225%18 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →