¡тαвıηнαs NTSKINS — CS2 Stats

76561198159598476[U:1:199332748]✓ No bans

248Tracked matches68%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,202Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating22,387Top 25% of 204,097 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#49443 of 251172 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,387 +2,729 25 Jan – 9 Oct · 37 days played
18,55522,897peak 22,89725 Jan9 Oct
23,154Peak Premier in tracked matches
62Days played since 2026-01-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 510 below peak (22,897)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,613 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-10-07
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,885), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate36.2%45.7%46.8%10.6% short
Shot accuracy14.5%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.081.051.06meets
Match win rate49.4%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG¡тαвıηнαs NTSKINSFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,387 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning59
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateLLLWWWLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility6.2
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch1.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.9
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time571ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy26.4%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 26.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 20 Apr →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · mirage, 31 Aug →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · mirage, 31 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 20 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 35anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS3525–1071%0.02
dust2A2414–1058%0.00
infernoB178–947%0.00
ancientD82–625%0.00
anubisD61–517%-0.01
nuke—42–250%0.02
cache—31–233%-0.03
overpass—31–233%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,573Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
2,644Matches
49.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
36.2%Headshot %
14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
6,457MVPs
1,225Hours (in match)
4,299Bombs planted
932Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,105
AWP10,006
P904,609
MP71,621
P250855

Lifetime map wins

16,452dust2
2,074inferno
792nuke
694vertigo
410train
272cbble
19safehouse
16office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

66Matches
61%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
75.8ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2259%1.1417.9
Dust21861%1.0613.6
Inferno875%1.1314.4
Nuke683%1.3121.5
Ancient450%1.1213.3
Anubis450%1.7618.5
Cache30%0.9516.7
Vertigo1100%2.0020.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.2%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
568msReaction time
39.8%T opening success
62.5%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
10.77HE damage / grenade
9.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.7783% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.0120%9 Oct →
mirage13–160.0228%8 Oct →
dust26–130.0222%7 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0215%7 Oct →
mirage13–70.0324%6 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0329%2 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0028%1 Oct →
dust213–90.0420%1 Oct →
inferno16–130.0319%27 Sept →
ancient15–150.0324%22 Sept →
mirage13–100.0425%22 Sept →
inferno16–120.019%21 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0222%21 Sept →
mirage13–110.0027%17 Sept →
dust215–150.0336%16 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0025%7 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0426%7 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0438%3 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0331%1 Sept →
dust213–80.0014%1 Sept →
ancient13–90.0526%1 Sept →
mirage13–80.0048%31 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0136%31 Aug →
ancient8–130.0035%30 Aug →
mirage13–40.0336%30 Aug →
dust213–90.0424%30 Aug →
dust213–70.0028%30 Aug →
mirage12–70.0230%27 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0124%25 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0429%23 Aug →
mirage2–130.0120%23 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0632%23 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0121%23 Aug →
ancient6–130.0336%23 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0120%20 Aug →
mirage13–40.0124%19 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0431%19 Aug →
inferno13–100.0233%16 Aug →
mirage13–90.0233%2 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0026%14 Jun →
nuke13–40.0216%16 May →
mirage14–160.0725%16 May →
dust27–13-0.0336%15 May →
overpass16–140.0322%2 May →
mirage13–70.0215%2 May →
inferno13–100.0122%1 May →
ancient7–130.0137%29 Apr →
mirage13–10.0726%20 Apr →
dust213–40.1116%20 Apr →
dust25–130.0518%16 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0325%11 Apr →
mirage13–110.1121%8 Apr →
mirage16–13-0.0029%5 Apr →
inferno5–130.0145%4 Apr →
nuke11–130.0326%3 Apr →
inferno13–50.0133%2 Apr →
mirage13–80.0424%28 Mar →
dust213–100.0220%19 Mar →
inferno14–16-0.0326%17 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.0527%14 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0611%14 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0330%13 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0324%10 Mar →
mirage4–130.0329%10 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0416%9 Mar →
anubis13–10-0.0333%8 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0135%8 Mar →
mirage13–9-0.0724%7 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0435%7 Mar →
overpass10–130.0442%5 Mar →
dust28–130.0026%4 Mar →
mirage7–130.0220%23 Feb →
dust213–3-0.0419%18 Feb →
overpass4–130.0325%17 Feb →
dust213–70.0023%16 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0117%11 Feb →
inferno15–150.0426%9 Feb →
inferno11–130.0224%9 Feb →
nuke13–110.0320%9 Feb →
inferno2–13-0.0438%8 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.049%8 Feb →
anubis13–160.0933%8 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0131%6 Feb →
inferno13–70.0128%6 Feb →
mirage16–120.0119%5 Feb →
mirage13–100.0033%5 Feb →
mirage13–40.1033%3 Feb →
inferno15–150.0019%3 Feb →
dust213–11-0.0336%27 Jan →
mirage13–7-0.039%26 Jan →
dust213–7-0.0619%26 Jan →
dust213–60.0518%25 Jan →
dust212–16-0.0119%25 Jan →
ancient13–9-0.0113%25 Jan →
mirage13–50.1130%24 Jan →
mirage5–11-0.0432%24 Jan →
mirage13–30.1022%24 Jan →
mirage13–90.0530%24 Jan →
inferno13–70.0514%24 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.0622%24 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.