✪ buc

✪ buc — CS2 Stats

US76561198157713600[U:1:197447872]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

742Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating17,292Purple band · top ~19.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14040 of 25422 tracked
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ bucPREMIER17,292 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning70
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45487Last 10045%Win rateWLLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.2
Aggression10.0
Utility4.3
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels6.4
Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 46% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning7.0
Utility4.3
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time567ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — inferno 9–3
132Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 59% over 17infernoWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1771041%-0.00
ancientA1710759%0.02
infernoD1651131%0.04
cacheB168850%0.01
mirageB137654%0.01
anubisC114736%0.00
nukeC104640%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

12Matches
50%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
72.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

80%1v1 clutch win
100%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient250%0.6610.0
Dust21100%0.9521.0
Train10%0.508.0
Cache1100%0.9415.0
Nuke1100%1.8027.0
Mirage1100%0.436.0
Inferno10%0.478.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
564msReaction time
45.8%T opening success
65.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
6.33HE damage / grenade
4.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–80.079%29 Aug
inferno8–130.0413%29 Aug
dust29–130.0424%20 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0029%20 Aug
ancient13–80.0918%12 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0812%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0210%8 Aug
inferno13–30.0319%8 Aug
dust213–11-0.0211%8 Aug
cache13–70.1217%8 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0526%7 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0311%1 Aug
cache7–13-0.0218%31 Jul
cache13–20.019%31 Jul
inferno9–30.1725%31 Jul
nuke13–100.0819%31 Jul
mirage13–90.0620%31 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0418%29 Jul
inferno8–130.0330%29 Jul
inferno15–150.0721%27 Jul
ancient6–130.0016%27 Jul
inferno9–7-0.0610%27 Jul
ancient15–150.0329%27 Jul
anubis10–130.0319%25 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0416%25 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0323%24 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0412%21 Jul
cache13–50.0433%21 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0420%21 Jul
dust213–11-0.0022%21 Jul
cache13–90.0521%21 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0013%20 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0217%20 Jul
dust27–130.0231%20 Jul
dust213–40.1017%20 Jul
inferno12–160.0114%20 Jul
inferno10–130.1233%20 Jul
cache13–16-0.0511%20 Jul
ancient13–70.0615%20 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0324%19 Jul
cache3–130.0018%19 Jul
inferno6–130.0221%19 Jul
anubis13–60.0617%19 Jul
cache7–130.0628%19 Jul
nuke13–20.0337%19 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0210%19 Jul
inferno15–150.1117%19 Jul
cache13–16-0.0624%19 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0222%19 Jul
dust213–100.0016%19 Jul
cache16–13-0.0122%19 Jul
ancient14–160.0012%19 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0014%18 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0617%18 Jul
cache13–100.0216%18 Jul
ancient15–150.0522%18 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0317%17 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0119%16 Jul
ancient13–60.0417%16 Jul
cache7–13-0.0511%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.0417%15 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0315%14 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0711%14 Jul
cache13–90.0326%14 Jul
dust211–13-0.0221%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0217%14 Jul
dust213–100.0220%14 Jul
nuke6–130.0324%14 Jul
cache5–13-0.0223%14 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0324%13 Jul
anubis7–130.0014%13 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0319%13 Jul
cache15–15-0.0313%12 Jul
cache13–70.0825%10 Jul
ancient11–130.0519%6 Jul
dust27–13-0.077%6 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0128%6 Jul
mirage13–50.0115%6 Jul
dust213–40.0319%6 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0014%5 Jul
mirage13–50.0622%5 Jul
ancient13–80.0516%5 Jul
mirage16–140.0411%5 Jul
inferno10–130.0619%5 Jul
nuke13–80.0217%5 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0121%5 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0035%5 Jul
ancient13–80.0227%5 Jul
dust215–15-0.0236%5 Jul
ancient13–70.0422%5 Jul
dust211–13-0.0414%4 Jul
dust211–13-0.0216%4 Jul
anubis8–130.0115%3 Jul
mirage13–60.0528%3 Jul
dust213–11-0.0219%3 Jul
dust26–130.0223%3 Jul
mirage11–130.0213%3 Jul
dust28–13-0.0719%3 Jul
inferno13–90.0717%3 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0118%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →