𝘗𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 — CS2 Stats

76561198157009000[U:1:196743272]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,059Tracked matches71%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.8 StrongSupport

Premier CS Rating24,858Top 25% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#25498 of 261675 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,433 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Nov 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,858 -1,042 1 Sept – 10 Nov · 13 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,433 +0 1 Sept – 7 Nov · 6 observations

25,900Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,433Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

35Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,433
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 67 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

1,042 below peak (25,900)
+322 over 30 days · steady
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 142 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-09-01
Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning65

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY68–23–9Last 10068%Win rateLWWLLWWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 26%
Avg reaction 483ms

Last 10

6–3–1 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 27%
Avg reaction 492ms

Last 20

13–5–2 · 65% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 28%
Avg reaction 500ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim9.2

Utility6.6

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels3.9

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning6.5

Utility6.6

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels5.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time516ms−9ms

first ⅓ avg 525ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms

Headshot accuracy26.0%−0.1%

first ⅓ avg 26.1% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 27 Aug →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · dust2, 17 Oct →

406msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · dust2, 26 Aug →

13–0Biggest win · vertigo, 20 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak

10–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 71mirageWeakest map · 44% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	71	53–18	75%	0.02
mirage	C	9	4–5	44%	0.02
cache	B	8	4–4	50%	0.04
inferno	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01
ancient	—	3	1–2	33%	0.04
vertigo	—	3	3–0	100%	0.01
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,092Matches

53%Win rate

1.15Avg K/D

82.6ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	171	62%	1.32	17.8
Ancient	107	52%	1.09	15.6
Mirage	98	45%	1.04	15.9
Anubis	91	51%	1.17	16.7
Vertigo	36	56%	1.29	18.0
Inferno	16	44%	0.97	15.3
Cache	9	44%	1.24	18.0
Nuke	8	25%	0.95	19.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.3%Headshot accuracy

38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.4%Spray accuracy

83.2%Counter-strafing

7.5°Preaim

520msReaction time

41.2%T opening success

60.2%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

9.4%Flash assists

8.88HE damage / grenade

10.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	7–13	-0.07	21%	13 Nov →
dust2	13–9	0.00	34%	13 Nov →
dust2	13–6	0.03	26%	13 Nov →
cache	6–13	0.05	20%	11 Nov →
inferno	2–13	-0.04	29%	11 Nov →
mirage	13–3	0.08	32%	11 Nov →
dust2	13–10	0.06	31%	10 Nov →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	31%	8 Nov →
dust2	13–7	0.14	32%	8 Nov →
dust2	12–12	-0.02	11%	8 Nov →
dust2	13–11	0.02	27%	6 Nov →
dust2	13–1	0.11	42%	6 Nov →
dust2	13–2	0.09	44%	5 Nov →
dust2	6–1	0.06	26%	5 Nov →
dust2	13–1	0.12	35%	5 Nov →
dust2	7–13	0.01	25%	5 Nov →
dust2	7–13	0.08	29%	5 Nov →
inferno	13–6	0.01	24%	5 Nov →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	21%	4 Nov →
dust2	13–4	0.09	20%	4 Nov →
dust2	11–13	0.05	33%	3 Nov →
dust2	13–4	0.02	28%	3 Nov →
cache	7–13	0.00	21%	3 Nov →
mirage	13–7	0.09	23%	3 Nov →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	36%	2 Nov →
dust2	13–8	0.12	26%	30 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.01	26%	30 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.01	24%	29 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.05	17%	29 Oct →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	12%	29 Oct →
inferno	14–16	0.03	9%	29 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.00	21%	28 Oct →
ancient	4–13	0.08	26%	28 Oct →
dust2	12–12	-0.04	20%	27 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.06	22%	27 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.09	15%	26 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.06	19%	26 Oct →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	31%	26 Oct →
dust2	2–5	-0.03	11%	26 Oct →
mirage	12–12	-0.02	18%	26 Oct →
dust2	13–10	-0.06	13%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.03	20%	23 Oct →
cache	10–13	-0.02	32%	23 Oct →
mirage	7–13	0.05	30%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.01	14%	21 Oct →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	0%	21 Oct →
cache	13–3	0.08	15%	21 Oct →
cache	13–11	0.01	11%	21 Oct →
inferno	13–4	0.04	17%	20 Oct →
vertigo	13–0	0.00	36%	20 Oct →
dust2	9–13	0.03	30%	20 Oct →
cache	5–13	0.04	16%	18 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.01	28%	18 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.02	25%	18 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	21%	18 Oct →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	32%	17 Oct →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	23%	17 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.01	16%	17 Oct →
dust2	2–0	0.17	50%	17 Oct →
ancient	12–12	0.06	26%	15 Oct →
vertigo	13–8	-0.00	14%	15 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.02	13%	9 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.05	28%	9 Oct →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	32%	8 Oct →
dust2	2–0	0.00	0%	8 Oct →
dust2	12–12	0.04	25%	7 Oct →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	22%	7 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	31%	6 Oct →
dust2	12–12	0.01	21%	6 Oct →
anubis	12–12	0.01	10%	6 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	31%	3 Oct →
mirage	4–13	-0.09	27%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.04	22%	2 Oct →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	30%	2 Oct →
dust2	13–6	0.04	27%	23 Sept →
vertigo	13–9	0.03	36%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.05	27%	23 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	19%	21 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.01	28%	17 Sept →
ancient	13–2	-0.02	23%	17 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	29%	6 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.04	16%	6 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.06	18%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	15%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.18	26%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	38%	26 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.01	26%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	20%	26 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	27%	26 Aug →
dust2	0–3	-0.04	50%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.03	25%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.04	36%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.01	48%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.01	32%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	20%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	19%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	24%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.07	20%	17 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.11	20%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.07	20%	17 Aug →