Reeke

Reeke — CS2 Stats

76561198156884733[U:1:196619005]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,141Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,491Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,770Blue band · top ~45.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,770 +357 23 Sept – 1 Oct · 2 days played
11,41311,770peak 11,77023 Sept1 Oct
11,770Peak Premier in tracked matches
55Days played since 2024-06-26

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 11,770
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,230 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,888), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate54.9%43.7%44.8%above
Shot accuracy5.3%12.0%12.4%7.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.741.021.030.29 short
Match win rate41.4%44.7%45.2%3.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGReekeFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER11,770 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning58
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–53Last 10047%Win rateLLWWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −91ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility4.6
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.8
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time623ms−107ms
first ⅓ avg 730ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–11 · nuke, 27 Jun →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 13 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · anubis, 12 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 12 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3112–1939%-0.02
dust2C218–1338%-0.01
nukeS2013–765%-0.01
infernoD103–730%-0.05
ancientS96–367%-0.03
cacheS64–267%-0.02
anubis—20–20%-0.03
train—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,405Lifetime kills
0.74K/D
1,703Matches
41.4%Match win rate
54.9%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 5 players
5.3%Shot accuracy
2,764MVPs
1,491Hours (in match)
1,104Bombs planted
297Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,250
AWP1,459
Knife779
MP9547
P250374

Lifetime map wins

1,889nuke
1,860dust2
1,402inferno
829vertigo
80cbble
30train
8office
2ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

931Matches
50%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
73.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage31552%0.9514.5
Ancient14847%0.9214.9
Nuke13363%0.9513.6
Dust210548%0.8913.8
Inferno10139%0.8714.6
Vertigo6333%0.9114.6
Overpass2162%1.1315.5
Anubis1937%0.9211.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
627msReaction time
47.6%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
6.46HE damage / grenade
8.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0920%13 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0116%13 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0219%13 Oct →
nuke19–15-0.0121%13 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0420%11 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0225%11 Oct →
dust25–13-0.038%7 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0332%1 Oct →
mirage13–70.0211%1 Oct →
cache13–80.0120%1 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.048%25 Sept →
ancient11–130.0213%24 Sept →
dust213–90.0222%23 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0411%23 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.082%23 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0123%23 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0624%23 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0316%17 Sept →
nuke13–100.0229%13 Sept →
mirage5–130.0227%13 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0647%13 Sept →
nuke13–50.0625%12 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0516%12 Sept →
dust212–160.0118%9 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0823%6 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0315%6 Sept →
mirage5–130.0127%4 Sept →
dust213–80.0328%4 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0213%3 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0018%3 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0915%3 Sept →
ancient16–130.0213%2 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0423%1 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.068%30 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0021%30 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0217%29 Aug →
inferno4–12-0.117%29 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0823%25 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0641%24 Aug →
dust29–130.0519%22 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.049%21 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.059%21 Aug →
nuke14–160.0220%21 Aug →
nuke16–12-0.0424%21 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0320%21 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0220%21 Aug →
nuke13–60.0317%19 Aug →
cache13–60.0126%19 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0117%18 Aug →
mirage10–130.0318%18 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.026%12 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0421%12 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0616%10 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.048%10 Aug →
dust24–130.0419%10 Aug →
nuke16–12-0.0816%9 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.067%7 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0321%6 Aug →
mirage13–40.1015%5 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0817%2 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0224%1 Aug →
dust213–70.0329%1 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.1222%1 Aug →
dust213–30.0933%1 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0313%1 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0018%30 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.056%29 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0815%29 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0819%25 Jul →
dust213–40.0330%25 Jul →
inferno16–13-0.0020%21 Jul →
dust28–13-0.066%21 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0813%29 Jun →
dust213–6-0.0529%29 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0529%29 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0627%29 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0943%29 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.0429%8 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0612%24 Sept →
train13–6-0.0418%25 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.068%13 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0220%13 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0420%21 Mar →
mirage13–40.0316%11 Mar →
nuke13–10-0.0628%5 Mar →
mirage13–9-0.0016%4 Mar →
nuke11–13-0.0613%11 Jan →
mirage11–13-0.0614%25 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.0229%17 Sept →
mirage13–100.0217%21 Aug →
nuke13–10.0820%12 Jul →
mirage13–90.0430%11 Jul →
nuke13–50.0313%8 Jul →
mirage7–130.0430%6 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0510%27 Jun →
nuke13–110.1823%27 Jun →
mirage13–90.0523%26 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0718%26 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0610%26 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0621%26 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.