Zeenox

Zeenox — CS2 Stats

DE76561198152549520[U:1:192283792]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,124Tracked matches68%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,058Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,878Top 25% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23594 of 251456 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,405 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,878 -1,311 28 Aug – 13 Oct · 5 days played
24,87826,189peak 26,18928 Aug13 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,405 +0 28 Aug – 20 Sept · 5 observations
2,4052,405peak 2,40528 Aug20 Sept
26,189Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,405Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,405
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 95 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,311 below peak (26,189)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 122 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,304), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate55.3%50.9%
Shot accuracy10.1%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.251.09
Match win rate64.3%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZeenoxFACEITLevel 10 · 2,405 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,878 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,405csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning64
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–32–10Last 10058%Win rateLWLWWWWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.0
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 47% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time565ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–0 · train, 26 Sept →
63%Best headshot accuracy · 6–0 · cache, 19 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · office, 19 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · train, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
6–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 86% over 7mirageWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB179–853%0.02
cacheB168–850%0.02
trainA148–657%0.02
infernoB126–650%-0.02
anubisS97–278%0.02
vertigoS76–186%0.04
mirageC52–340%-0.01
nuke—42–250%-0.00
overpass—42–250%0.04
boulder—32–167%-0.02
office—32–167%0.05
shelter—32–167%0.01
dust2—21–150%-0.00
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

279,030Lifetime kills
1.25K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players
13,429Matches
64.3%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 10 players
55.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players
10.1%Shot accuracy
23,867MVPs
8,058Hours (in match)
9,810Bombs planted
3,307Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47118,101
AWP28,697
P2504,851
Tec-94,616
MP94,461

Lifetime map wins

12,486dust2
8,345inferno
5,536vertigo
4,863nuke
4,718cbble
3,671train
506office
288italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,940Matches
53%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.2ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient43156%1.0515.5
Anubis39356%1.0815.9
Nuke15244%1.0015.0
Inferno14948%1.0515.1
Mirage11238%0.9714.5
Vertigo11159%1.1216.8
Train7559%1.0716.1
Cache5551%1.0214.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
565msReaction time
67.7%T opening success
46.8%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
12.9%Flash assists
9.22HE damage / grenade
6.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient2–90.0242%13 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0223%13 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0141%13 Oct →
nuke13–40.0834%13 Oct →
ancient13–60.0116%13 Oct →
train13–1-0.0510%10 Oct →
vertigo13–90.047%9 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0244%8 Oct →
train13–50.0432%8 Oct →
ancient12–12-0.0520%7 Oct →
ancient5–130.0222%7 Oct →
anubis13–20.1519%7 Oct →
overpass12–120.0718%7 Oct →
cache13–80.0418%7 Oct →
train4–13-0.0441%7 Oct →
boulder13–11-0.0527%7 Oct →
cache13–20.0716%7 Oct →
inferno13–30.1227%7 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0157%6 Oct →
ancient13–40.0129%6 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0821%4 Oct →
inferno8–80.0228%3 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.2613%3 Oct →
office13–40.0823%1 Oct →
mirage13–10.0129%1 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0611%1 Oct →
cache13–80.0624%1 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0415%30 Sept →
train13–90.0015%30 Sept →
vertigo13–5-0.0125%30 Sept →
ancient13–40.0413%30 Sept →
vertigo9–13-0.0127%27 Sept →
inferno13–80.0116%26 Sept →
train13–00.2424%26 Sept →
overpass13–70.0020%25 Sept →
boulder13–10.0239%25 Sept →
ancient13–30.0830%25 Sept →
vertigo13–7-0.0232%25 Sept →
cache13–110.0915%25 Sept →
ancient13–80.0629%25 Sept →
fachwerk13–9-0.0410%25 Sept →
anubis13–70.0020%25 Sept →
train1–13-0.1233%25 Sept →
ancient1–4-0.0120%25 Sept →
shelter8–13-0.0131%25 Sept →
dust24–130.0226%24 Sept →
office4–13-0.0234%22 Sept →
train2–130.0236%22 Sept →
anubis13–70.0920%22 Sept →
shelter13–80.0623%22 Sept →
cache13–80.0524%22 Sept →
inferno9–70.0128%22 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0412%22 Sept →
cache6–13-0.029%21 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0920%20 Sept →
shelter13–8-0.0238%20 Sept →
cache13–80.0126%20 Sept →
anubis13–50.0122%20 Sept →
ancient8–130.0416%20 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0523%20 Sept →
mirage6–130.0025%20 Sept →
train13–60.0722%20 Sept →
train13–50.0222%19 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0121%19 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0330%19 Sept →
train2–13-0.0617%19 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0023%19 Sept →
ancient12–120.0111%19 Sept →
office13–30.1041%19 Sept →
mirage11–3-0.0224%19 Sept →
mirage12–120.0225%19 Sept →
ancient13–110.0215%19 Sept →
cache6–0-0.0163%19 Sept →
vertigo13–70.1025%19 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0417%18 Sept →
inferno13–110.0125%18 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0230%18 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0224%18 Sept →
train13–30.1010%18 Sept →
cache12–120.0524%18 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0127%17 Sept →
train13–100.0721%17 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0129%17 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0412%17 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0316%17 Sept →
boulder8–13-0.0525%17 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0111%16 Sept →
cache13–20.0624%16 Sept →
vertigo13–10.1233%16 Sept →
train8–130.0120%15 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.007%15 Sept →
ancient10–130.0218%15 Sept →
anubis13–100.0325%15 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0320%15 Sept →
overpass9–10.0333%10 Sept →
ancient13–70.0629%9 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0023%9 Sept →
train12–120.0227%9 Sept →
nuke6–130.0233%9 Sept →
overpass12–120.0622%9 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.