Sid the Stallion

Sid the Stallion — CS2 Stats

US76561198150010019[U:1:189744291]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

782Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,845Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 782 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 23 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 +55 23 Mar2 Jul · 31 days played
18,59122,494peak 22,49423 Mar2 Jul
22,494Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-03-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,302), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate46.2%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy16.7%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.301.051.06above
Match win rate45.3%45.7%46.3%1.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSid the StallionFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning58
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52453Last 10052%Win rateLWWLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · −66ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility3.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.8
Utility3.4
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time595ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 8 Apr
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 8 Apr
438msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 24 Mar
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 24 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30161453%0.01
dust2B28141450%-0.01
infernoC125742%0.03
ancientA116555%0.00
nukeS107370%-0.00
anubisC52340%0.00
overpass21150%0.05
cache110100%0.08
alpine1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

122,333Lifetime kills
1.30K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
5,155Matches
45.3%Match win rate
46.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
16.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
17,671MVPs
1,845Hours (in match)
3,482Bombs planted
2,170Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,731
AWP18,251
P2503,042
SSG 082,253
UMP-452,100
Tec-91,603

Lifetime map wins

10,296dust2
6,274inferno
2,454cbble
2,263train
1,677nuke
736vertigo
329lake
123office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

9Matches
67%Win rate
1.44Avg K/D
81.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2540%0.9512.8
Ancient1100%2.5718.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
591msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
11.31HE damage / grenade
2.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4553 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.424% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0215%30 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0316%17 Aug
cache13–40.0820%17 Aug
mirage8–13-0.058%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0021%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0126%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0317%16 Aug
mirage13–6-0.008%9 Jul
mirage11–130.0718%2 Jul
dust29–13-0.0322%30 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0221%26 Jun
alpine9–13-0.0214%25 Jun
mirage13–80.0125%25 May
dust213–50.0114%25 May
nuke4–130.0129%9 May
dust24–13-0.0423%2 May
mirage13–60.0615%2 May
inferno13–160.0511%1 May
inferno6–00.0429%1 May
mirage13–4-0.013%1 May
dust211–13-0.0222%1 May
nuke13–90.0425%28 Apr
mirage10–130.0116%28 Apr
dust213–60.0018%28 Apr
nuke2–13-0.0913%28 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0813%26 Apr
dust213–90.0318%26 Apr
dust213–80.0333%26 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0912%26 Apr
inferno13–160.0419%26 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0411%25 Apr
ancient13–100.0431%25 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0118%25 Apr
dust213–9-0.0111%24 Apr
dust28–13-0.0613%24 Apr
dust213–110.0218%16 Apr
dust214–160.0133%15 Apr
overpass1–130.0119%13 Apr
ancient6–130.0818%13 Apr
mirage16–140.028%11 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0331%11 Apr
dust27–13-0.0518%11 Apr
ancient1–13-0.0327%10 Apr
dust29–13-0.0010%10 Apr
mirage9–130.0422%9 Apr
dust213–11-0.0120%8 Apr
inferno13–50.1431%8 Apr
dust213–60.0534%8 Apr
mirage13–40.0623%8 Apr
mirage13–70.0218%8 Apr
dust213–10-0.0219%7 Apr
dust29–13-0.0222%6 Apr
mirage8–00.0316%6 Apr
inferno8–130.0112%5 Apr
mirage15–15-0.027%4 Apr
dust213–9-0.0220%4 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0118%4 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0321%3 Apr
mirage15–150.0318%3 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0018%2 Apr
ancient6–13-0.065%2 Apr
mirage13–110.0118%2 Apr
nuke13–110.0316%2 Apr
mirage13–70.1121%2 Apr
dust213–40.0617%1 Apr
ancient13–70.0719%1 Apr
dust20–13-0.0021%1 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0026%31 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0225%31 Mar
anubis13–50.0527%31 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0711%31 Mar
inferno13–40.0919%31 Mar
nuke13–90.0810%31 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0421%30 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0210%30 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0319%30 Mar
dust213–11-0.0215%30 Mar
dust29–13-0.0421%30 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0317%30 Mar
dust213–9-0.0432%30 Mar
inferno13–110.1129%30 Mar
dust24–13-0.0424%28 Mar
mirage13–80.0122%28 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0428%28 Mar
dust210–13-0.0523%28 Mar
nuke13–80.0221%28 Mar
anubis13–160.0312%25 Mar
ancient13–50.0115%25 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0117%25 Mar
mirage13–10.0422%24 Mar
mirage11–130.0014%24 Mar
anubis14–160.0318%24 Mar
mirage11–130.0417%24 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0115%24 Mar
overpass13–100.0820%23 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0219%23 Mar
dust213–70.0121%23 Mar
nuke2–13-0.0119%23 Mar
dust215–150.0324%23 Mar
ancient13–20.0215%23 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →