Clxyy

Clxyy — CS2 Stats

US76561198149563980[U:1:189298252]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

370Tracked matches59%Win rate2022Tracked since
918Hours in CS57Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating9,056Light Blue band · top ~59.4% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+705Premier CS Rating · 8,351 → 9,056

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,056 +1,059 7 Sept – 9 Oct · 20 days played
7,2089,056peak 9,0567 Sept9 Oct
9,056Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 9,056
  • +818 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 944 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches120——
Win rate52%——
K/D1.11——
Headshot %44%——

Measured 10 Sep 2026 → 9 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,820), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate34.6%39.9%42.0%7.4% short
Shot accuracy9.4%7.0%9.6%0.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.890.920.980.09 short
Match win rate38.1%42.3%43.8%5.7% short

This profile sits below the typical Blue band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGClxyyPREMIER9,056 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning60
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–41–6Last 10053%Win rateWWWLWLLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.6
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 62% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning6.0
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time581ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 564ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 7 Sept →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · mirage, 7 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · cache, 7 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W3Current streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 14cacheWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA1911–858%0.02
mirageA1810–856%0.02
ancientS1410–471%0.02
anubisB126–650%0.01
cacheD124–833%0.01
infernoC125–742%0.02
vertigoA53–260%0.05
dust2—32–167%0.03
train—21–150%0.02
debris—21–150%0.03
poseidon—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

20,812Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
1,383Matches
38.1%Match win rate
34.6%Headshot %
9.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Light Blue band
2,407MVPs
522Hours (in match)
787Bombs planted
342Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,383dust2
1,141nuke
911inferno
311vertigo
305train
62office
55cbble
6lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
0%Win rate
0.50Avg K/D
61.9ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust220%0.548.0
Ancient10%0.436.0
Mirage10%0.386.0
Inferno10%0.6312.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
572msReaction time
62.2%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
7.60HE damage / grenade
9.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.9463% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–50.0613%9 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0219%9 Oct →
ancient16–140.0711%7 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0523%7 Oct →
anubis13–80.039%5 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0820%5 Oct →
nuke5–130.0111%4 Oct →
dust213–90.0919%4 Oct →
ancient15–150.0510%4 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0426%4 Oct →
anubis13–100.0014%4 Oct →
nuke13–70.089%4 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.015%4 Oct →
ancient16–140.0220%4 Oct →
nuke13–110.0523%3 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0511%3 Oct →
nuke3–130.0513%3 Oct →
ancient13–30.0113%3 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0012%3 Oct →
cache13–90.1014%1 Oct →
vertigo13–70.0816%1 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0410%1 Oct →
inferno5–12-0.0125%1 Oct →
train8–13-0.0127%1 Oct →
nuke13–70.0520%1 Oct →
vertigo9–130.1412%1 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0118%30 Sept →
train13–50.0415%30 Sept →
cache13–60.0917%30 Sept →
ancient13–40.0914%30 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0325%30 Sept →
vertigo11–40.0521%29 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.006%29 Sept →
nuke13–20.0629%29 Sept →
nuke13–60.0621%29 Sept →
ancient13–70.0115%27 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0410%27 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0122%27 Sept →
mirage11–130.0626%27 Sept →
anubis13–100.0021%27 Sept →
cache13–40.0214%27 Sept →
ancient12–120.0419%27 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0112%26 Sept →
mirage13–60.045%25 Sept →
inferno13–100.0213%25 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0311%24 Sept →
mirage13–100.0216%23 Sept →
inferno11–130.0418%23 Sept →
cache13–80.0415%23 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0116%23 Sept →
mirage13–90.0816%22 Sept →
anubis13–80.066%22 Sept →
anubis9–130.0013%20 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0420%20 Sept →
mirage11–130.0114%20 Sept →
vertigo3–12-0.0423%19 Sept →
debris3–9-0.0421%19 Sept →
anubis13–110.0514%19 Sept →
inferno8–130.0516%19 Sept →
ancient13–50.0617%19 Sept →
vertigo13–10.0416%19 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0216%18 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0714%18 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0128%18 Sept →
nuke14–160.0411%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0514%17 Sept →
mirage13–60.0216%17 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0113%16 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0514%16 Sept →
nuke8–90.0614%16 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0210%15 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0112%15 Sept →
ancient13–50.0311%15 Sept →
cache7–130.0427%13 Sept →
ancient12–6-0.0617%13 Sept →
mirage6–100.0014%12 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0112%12 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0117%12 Sept →
inferno13–90.0214%12 Sept →
nuke13–110.0514%12 Sept →
nuke9–130.0517%12 Sept →
poseidon8–80.0419%12 Sept →
debris9–40.0923%12 Sept →
dust213–40.0417%11 Sept →
inferno13–20.079%11 Sept →
mirage13–10.0718%11 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0011%10 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.009%10 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0013%10 Sept →
mirage13–30.0711%9 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0210%9 Sept →
ancient13–50.0513%9 Sept →
cache7–130.028%9 Sept →
mirage13–100.1017%7 Sept →
mirage13–10.1034%7 Sept →
anubis15–150.0023%7 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0212%7 Sept →
inferno13–10.1814%7 Sept →
nuke13–00.0133%7 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0417%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.