StaarCadet — CS2 Stats

CO76561198147840075[U:1:187574347]Steam profile ↗

1,923Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,388Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating24,319Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2889 of 14404 tracked

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Pink band median
Headshot rate	35.4%	48.1%
Shot accuracy	16.1%	12.9%
Kill/death ratio	1.05	1.08
Match win rate	70.3%	46.5%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56

Positioning49

Utility81

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateWLWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim5.6

Aggression4.0

Utility8.1

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels0.8

Clutch3.0

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 81 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6

Positioning4.9

Utility8.1

Mechanics4.3

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time527ms−28ms

first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms

Headshot accuracy12.1%−3.4%

first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 12.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–6

13–1Biggest win — anubis

7Longest win streak

11–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 72% over 18mirageWeakest map · 47% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	19	11–8	58%	-0.01
inferno	S	18	13–5	72%	0.00
mirage	B	17	8–9	47%	-0.01
anubis	B	17	8–9	47%	-0.01
nuke	B	15	8–7	53%	0.01
ancient	B	13	7–6	54%	0.01
dust2	—	1	1–0	100%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

119,422Lifetime kills

1.05K/D

14,070Matches

70.3%Match win rate · Top 5% of Pink band

35.4%Headshot %

16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Pink band

18,358MVPs

2,305Hours (in match)

5,671Bombs planted

1,692Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,076

M4A4 / M4A1-S16,273

AWP13,961

P2000 / USP-S7,015

Glock-185,541

Desert Eagle5,524

UMP-453,686

P2503,236

Galil AR3,220

MP92,972

Lifetime map wins

10,199inferno

5,346dust2

4,012nuke

2,800train

2,770vertigo

1,363cbble

575lake

512bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

187Matches

49%Win rate

1.01Avg K/D

80.3ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

34%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	17	41%	1.21	14.8
Mirage	14	43%	0.91	13.9
Inferno	13	69%	0.95	14.5
Anubis	12	67%	1.11	14.3
Overpass	11	45%	1.12	15.4
Nuke	6	33%	0.90	14.0
Vertigo	6	33%	1.20	17.8
Cache	2	100%	1.04	14.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.2%Headshot accuracy

34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.0%Spray accuracy

69.5%Counter-strafing

11.0°Preaim

524msReaction time

27.7%T opening success

38.8%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

8.1%Flash assists

9.56HE damage / grenade

15.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.2335% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.7257% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	16–14	0.02	9%	28 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	9%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.04	10%	26 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.06	16%	23 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	21%	22 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	12%	22 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.01	8%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.03	15%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.00	4%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	14%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.05	9%	21 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	10%	20 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.00	8%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	12%	19 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	17%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	7%	19 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	10%	19 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	11%	17 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	9%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.05	16%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	16%	15 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	17%	15 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.04	27%	15 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	12%	14 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	15%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	14%	14 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	10%	14 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.08	13%	14 Aug →
ancient	3–13	0.02	15%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	11%	12 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.02	10%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	4%	11 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.03	12%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.08	25%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	10%	11 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	8%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–1	-0.04	10%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	11%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	13%	9 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.06	20%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.03	16%	9 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.00	13%	9 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.00	13%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.13	20%	4 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	26%	30 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.10	19%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.05	5%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	15%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.07	5%	25 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.05	24%	25 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.03	100%	23 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	7%	22 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.06	8%	21 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.06	14%	20 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	11%	19 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.01	10%	16 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.05	12%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	13%	14 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.03	28%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.02	14%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.04	12%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	4%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.07	13%	13 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.03	19%	12 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	12%	12 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.02	16%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.09	18%	12 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	11%	12 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.04	15%	12 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	15%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	14%	12 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.09	13%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.03	18%	12 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	9%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.07	17%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.02	22%	11 Jul →
cache	16–12	-0.02	4%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.07	17%	10 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.04	22%	10 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	18%	10 Jul →
anubis	16–12	0.09	14%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.02	19%	10 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	16%	9 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	12%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.00	17%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.02	29%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–16	0.01	23%	9 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.05	17%	9 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	18%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.07	4%	6 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.06	10%	6 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.09	12%	6 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	12%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.05	24%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.03	10%	3 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	19%	3 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.00	14%	3 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.01	12%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	16%	3 Jul →