t0mmins-

t0mmins- — CS2 Stats

DE76561198147537230[U:1:187271502]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,297Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,859 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (26 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,859 → 1,859
+16Tracked matches · now 1,297
−6.7ppWin rate · 70.0% → 63.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,704 +4,396 14 Feb – 2 Jul · 15 days played
21,30826,374peak 26,37414 Feb2 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,859 +0 17 Sept – 6 Oct · 3 observations
1,8591,859peak 1,85917 Sept6 Oct
26,374Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,859Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-02-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,859
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 142 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGt0mmins-FACEITLevel 10 · 1,859 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,859csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning63
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–36–4Last 10060%Win rateLWLLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −7.2pp headshot accuracy · +39ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility6.2
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.3
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time516ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy25.8%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.36Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 5 Mar →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · inferno, 24 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–0 · inferno, 24 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 17mirageWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1911–858%0.02
infernoS1712–571%0.05
mirageC167–944%0.02
nukeA138–562%0.06
anubisA85–363%0.04
dust2A85–363%-0.00
cacheA85–363%0.01
overpass—31–233%0.01
office—33–0100%0.04
vertigo—21–150%-0.01
shelter—11–0100%-0.03
poseidon—11–0100%0.01
train—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

630Matches
54%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
78.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4151%1.0415.4
Inferno1958%1.0115.1
Overpass1844%1.0915.1
Dust21765%1.1216.8
Nuke1547%1.0216.3
Anubis1136%0.9213.1
Mirage956%1.0612.8
Cache967%1.0519.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
527msReaction time
55.6%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
7.82HE damage / grenade
16.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.4728% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.0228%30 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0121%30 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0015%30 Oct →
nuke10–130.0132%21 Oct →
ancient13–110.0316%21 Oct →
dust213–100.0118%21 Oct →
inferno13–100.0727%21 Oct →
ancient14–160.0024%12 Oct →
inferno10–130.0336%12 Oct →
dust217–190.0018%8 Oct →
inferno10–130.0628%8 Oct →
dust213–110.0336%8 Oct →
ancient13–60.0325%6 Oct →
anubis13–40.0737%6 Oct →
dust219–15-0.0221%30 Sept →
ancient13–30.0828%30 Sept →
inferno13–30.0623%24 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0821%24 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0031%24 Sept →
inferno9–00.3457%24 Sept →
nuke9–30.1634%24 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0820%21 Sept →
anubis13–80.0313%21 Sept →
inferno13–80.0131%18 Sept →
ancient13–110.0320%18 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0333%16 Sept →
inferno13–90.0036%16 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0122%16 Sept →
dust219–17-0.0121%13 Sept →
ancient13–70.0230%10 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0020%2 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0117%3 Aug →
nuke3–130.0012%3 Aug →
shelter13–5-0.0343%2 Aug →
cache11–130.0213%23 Jul →
cache13–110.0119%12 Jul →
nuke13–100.0123%9 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0333%9 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0227%2 Jul →
ancient11–130.0120%2 Jul →
cache13–110.0112%7 Jun →
ancient13–110.0115%7 Jun →
poseidon9–30.0126%28 May →
vertigo3–9-0.0819%28 May →
ancient13–80.0523%27 May →
inferno13–60.0226%21 May →
mirage7–13-0.0329%21 May →
overpass13–110.0519%17 May →
cache13–9-0.0124%17 May →
nuke4–13-0.0521%10 May →
cache13–80.1137%30 Apr →
overpass15–150.0115%30 Apr →
nuke13–60.0929%30 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.0014%15 Apr →
mirage6–2-0.0027%15 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0116%15 Apr →
anubis16–130.0315%15 Apr →
nuke13–9-0.0135%15 Apr →
inferno9–60.0933%1 Apr →
mirage11–130.0123%1 Apr →
overpass11–13-0.0122%1 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0226%1 Apr →
ancient13–30.0313%26 Mar →
ancient13–40.0710%26 Mar →
mirage13–30.0718%26 Mar →
train12–12-0.0316%18 Mar →
office13–100.0225%18 Mar →
office13–60.0424%18 Mar →
vertigo13–40.0635%13 Mar →
office13–70.0643%12 Mar →
nuke9–10.3635%5 Mar →
inferno8–80.0928%5 Mar →
mirage13–40.0726%3 Mar →
ancient13–90.0417%3 Mar →
mirage13–110.0522%3 Mar →
ancient9–130.1324%2 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0333%2 Mar →
mirage8–130.0523%2 Mar →
mirage13–70.0513%27 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0519%27 Feb →
nuke13–50.1045%27 Feb →
anubis13–80.0428%27 Feb →
anubis8–130.0130%21 Feb →
ancient9–130.0222%21 Feb →
nuke13–90.0123%21 Feb →
mirage15–15-0.0023%19 Feb →
mirage13–80.0323%16 Feb →
inferno13–40.0729%16 Feb →
nuke11–130.0922%16 Feb →
inferno13–70.0729%15 Feb →
mirage13–70.0521%15 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0231%14 Feb →
inferno8–130.0131%14 Feb →
ancient13–90.0022%14 Feb →
anubis9–130.1023%14 Feb →
mirage9–130.0526%14 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0420%14 Feb →
nuke9–130.0128%7 Feb →
anubis13–110.0730%6 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0230%6 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.