Milo — CS2 Stats

AU76561198145669812[U:1:185404084]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,820Tracked matches40%Win rate2022Tracked since

2,650Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating21,546Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#62490 of 259056 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,887 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Aug 2026 (63 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 21,546 → 21,546

0Faceit ELO · 1,887 → 1,887

+112Tracked matches · now 2,820

−29.0ppWin rate · 69.0% → 40.0%

Rating over time

21,546Peak Premier on CSDB

1,887Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

33Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,887
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 114 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 21,546
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,454 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	74.9%	50.9%
Shot accuracy	3.2%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.64	1.09
Match win rate	43.0%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning63

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–55–1Last 10044%Win rateLLWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · +4ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 12%
Avg reaction 486ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

8–12 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.7

Utility6.0

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 65% on T to 46% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning6.3

Utility6.0

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels6.3

Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time520ms−29ms

first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 520ms

Headshot accuracy14.5%−2.9%

first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 2 Sept →

34%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 9 Sept →

344msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · anubis, 22 Sept →

13–2Biggest win · cache, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

L2Current streak

10–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8mirageWeakest map · 32% over 22

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	28	12–16	43%	-0.02
mirage	D	22	7–15	32%	-0.01
anubis	A	20	12–8	60%	0.00
cache	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.01
inferno	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.01
nuke	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
ancient	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 22). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

180,808Lifetime kills

1.64K/D · Top 5% of Level 10 players

3,475Matches

43.0%Match win rate

74.9%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 10 players

3.2%Shot accuracy

6,661MVPs

4,345Hours (in match)

3,247Bombs planted

945Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47125,748

M4A4 / M4A1-S17,994

Desert Eagle9,372

AWP7,726

P2000 / USP-S5,930

Glock-182,247

Galil AR1,958

MP91,544

SSG 081,367

FAMAS1,164

Lifetime map wins

6,352dust2

4,281nuke

3,816inferno

1,360vertigo

700train

76office

14cbble

8ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

852Matches

51%Win rate

1.02Avg K/D

76.5ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

16%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	254	51%	1.06	15.2
Dust2	157	46%	0.89	13.0
Ancient	111	50%	1.01	15.0
Inferno	104	48%	0.98	14.8
Anubis	98	51%	1.10	16.9
Nuke	62	60%	1.10	16.3
Vertigo	25	40%	0.98	16.0
Cache	18	44%	0.83	12.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy

42.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.7%Spray accuracy

85.8%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

525msReaction time

64.7%T opening success

45.9%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

10.9%Flash assists

5.78HE damage / grenade

16.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.6395% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	-0.09	10%	31 Oct →
inferno	11–13	0.02	21%	31 Oct →
anubis	13–11	0.02	8%	31 Oct →
nuke	13–16	0.03	9%	31 Oct →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	12%	31 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	18%	30 Oct →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	13%	30 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	14%	30 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.01	14%	29 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	20%	29 Oct →
mirage	6–13	0.01	13%	29 Oct →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	20%	27 Oct →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	12%	27 Oct →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	19%	27 Oct →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	12%	26 Oct →
anubis	19–15	0.02	14%	26 Oct →
inferno	13–11	-0.05	18%	23 Oct →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	19%	23 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.07	20%	23 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.00	16%	22 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	12%	22 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.01	11%	21 Oct →
cache	5–13	-0.07	13%	21 Oct →
anubis	13–10	0.06	20%	21 Oct →
dust2	19–16	0.04	13%	19 Oct →
anubis	10–13	0.01	8%	19 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.05	17%	19 Oct →
inferno	8–13	0.03	15%	19 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.03	15%	15 Oct →
dust2	4–13	-0.09	17%	15 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.03	7%	15 Oct →
mirage	13–9	0.04	18%	10 Oct →
anubis	13–11	0.02	10%	10 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.11	25%	4 Oct →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	27%	1 Oct →
anubis	10–13	0.00	24%	1 Oct →
cache	10–13	-0.05	17%	30 Sept →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	22%	30 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	-0.02	26%	29 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	30%	29 Sept →
cache	13–10	-0.01	11%	27 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	8%	27 Sept →
mirage	13–5	0.04	23%	24 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	19%	24 Sept →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	26%	24 Sept →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	22%	24 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.02	25%	23 Sept →
anubis	13–10	0.01	17%	22 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.02	32%	21 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	8%	19 Sept →
anubis	16–13	0.01	15%	19 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.03	20%	19 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.02	22%	19 Sept →
nuke	5–13	-0.08	10%	18 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	13%	18 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	15%	18 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.02	17%	18 Sept →
inferno	13–3	-0.03	10%	16 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.00	9%	16 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.01	16%	16 Sept →
dust2	3–13	-0.09	14%	16 Sept →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	10%	16 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	15%	16 Sept →
inferno	12–16	-0.02	15%	15 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	20%	15 Sept →
cache	13–4	0.04	20%	15 Sept →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	13%	11 Sept →
mirage	3–13	0.01	13%	11 Sept →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	24%	11 Sept →
cache	3–13	-0.07	13%	11 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	34%	9 Sept →
cache	13–2	0.04	24%	9 Sept →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	16%	9 Sept →
cache	11–13	-0.03	13%	9 Sept →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	10%	8 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	24%	8 Sept →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	17%	8 Sept →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	28%	8 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	20%	8 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	19%	7 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.07	10%	7 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.00	28%	6 Sept →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	13%	6 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	21%	6 Sept →
ancient	10–13	0.03	11%	6 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.03	15%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–3	0.07	21%	5 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.09	19%	5 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	21%	5 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	17%	5 Sept →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	16%	4 Sept →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	20%	4 Sept →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	13%	4 Sept →
cache	7–13	-0.04	9%	4 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.05	10%	4 Sept →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	13%	3 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.01	18%	3 Sept →
anubis	13–10	0.01	10%	3 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.01	17%	3 Sept →
anubis	13–3	0.12	19%	2 Sept →