ibra

ibra — CS2 Stats

AL76561198145646735[U:1:185381007]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,537Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,116Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82130 of 261592 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,517 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,116 +803 17 Aug – 27 Oct · 26 days played
18,24620,576peak 20,57617 Aug27 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,517 +0 5 Sept – 26 Oct · 4 observations
1,5171,517peak 1,5175 Sept26 Oct
20,741Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,517Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,517
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 14 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 460 below peak (20,576)
  • +2 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,884 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGibraFACEITLevel 7 · 1,517 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,116 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,517csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning55
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateWWLLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +4.5pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.9
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.2

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.89 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.5
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time512ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 522ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 19 Aug →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · shelter, 24 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · dust2, 23 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 1 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3924–1562%0.01
mirageC167–944%-0.02
ancientA138–562%0.01
anubisD103–730%-0.02
cacheC94–544%-0.01
nukeA85–363%0.03
inferno—31–233%-0.01
shelter—10–10%-0.02
train—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

217Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
81.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5654%1.0216.6
Dust24358%1.0115.8
Inferno4154%0.9915.8
Ancient3543%1.1316.9
Nuke1753%0.9716.9
Anubis1369%1.2218.5
Train540%1.2322.8
Cache367%1.1117.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
78.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
521msReaction time
42.1%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.89Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
7.15HE damage / grenade
4.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.4973% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–11-0.0713%27 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0421%19 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.0616%13 Oct →
nuke6–130.0334%9 Oct →
dust213–70.0223%25 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0614%24 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0420%21 Sept →
cache11–130.0430%20 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0112%20 Sept →
mirage8–130.0416%16 Sept →
mirage13–100.0122%11 Sept →
inferno13–100.0814%10 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.049%7 Sept →
cache13–8-0.025%7 Sept →
dust28–130.0025%6 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.068%6 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.1112%5 Sept →
dust213–50.0914%5 Sept →
ancient13–110.0419%5 Sept →
dust212–160.0525%5 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0119%5 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0123%5 Sept →
dust211–130.0514%5 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.019%5 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.156%5 Sept →
nuke13–110.0123%5 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0624%4 Sept →
dust213–40.1129%4 Sept →
nuke13–90.0212%4 Sept →
dust213–90.0619%4 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.097%3 Sept →
mirage13–50.0416%3 Sept →
anubis6–130.0527%3 Sept →
dust20–10-0.0713%3 Sept →
dust213–60.0424%3 Sept →
dust213–50.007%3 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0116%3 Sept →
cache10–130.0818%2 Sept →
dust211–130.0121%2 Sept →
dust213–100.0212%2 Sept →
ancient13–70.0116%2 Sept →
anubis2–130.0329%2 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0615%1 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0215%1 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0624%1 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0122%1 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.078%1 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0335%1 Sept →
dust23–13-0.1014%28 Aug →
dust213–90.0217%28 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0421%28 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0324%27 Aug →
dust213–100.0516%27 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0020%27 Aug →
cache5–130.0421%27 Aug →
anubis13–40.0817%27 Aug →
mirage13–70.0626%27 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0325%27 Aug →
mirage17–19-0.0017%24 Aug →
dust213–50.0210%24 Aug →
mirage17–19-0.0322%24 Aug →
shelter9–13-0.0242%24 Aug →
cache3–13-0.020%24 Aug →
ancient13–80.0116%24 Aug →
dust213–100.0229%23 Aug →
dust29–130.0328%23 Aug →
dust213–110.0118%23 Aug →
dust210–130.0226%23 Aug →
nuke13–80.1117%23 Aug →
dust216–140.0118%23 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0211%23 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0317%23 Aug →
ancient13–30.085%23 Aug →
nuke13–60.0823%23 Aug →
dust213–40.0612%23 Aug →
ancient13–40.0916%23 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0219%23 Aug →
nuke13–80.0925%23 Aug →
dust210–130.0121%23 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0124%23 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0123%22 Aug →
cache13–2-0.079%22 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0423%22 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0228%22 Aug →
dust210–20.0616%22 Aug →
train13–60.0220%22 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0622%22 Aug →
ancient6–130.0223%19 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0324%19 Aug →
ancient13–70.1128%19 Aug →
dust210–130.0515%19 Aug →
dust213–80.0627%19 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0130%19 Aug →
mirage2–11-0.059%18 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0229%18 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0215%18 Aug →
dust212–50.0423%18 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0511%18 Aug →
dust213–40.0528%18 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0710%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.