raix

raix — CS2 Stats

76561198145134594[U:1:184868866]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

707Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
965Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#81933 of 228161 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 24 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,559 +4,251 25 Sept17 Jan · 21 days played
14,99920,291peak 20,29125 Sept17 Jan
20,291Peak Premier in tracked matches
53Days played since 2025-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,274), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate38.4%43.8%44.8%6.4% short
Shot accuracy17.1%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.381.021.04above
Match win rate78.7%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGraixFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning62
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42526Last 10042%Win rateLWLWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · +70ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility4.0
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch6.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.2
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time619ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 1 Jan
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · office, 27 Jan
453msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · office, 1 Dec
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 10 Dec

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 57% over 7nukeWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29131645%0.01
infernoC2181338%0.00
officeA116555%0.01
ancientB115645%0.02
dust2A74357%0.00
nukeD5050%-0.02
cache41325%0.05
vertigo41325%0.04
anubis32167%0.05
overpass31233%-0.01
train21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

55,259Lifetime kills
1.38K/D · Top 10% of Level 5 players
7,303Matches
78.7%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 5 players
38.4%Headshot %
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
5,488MVPs
965Hours (in match)
3,301Bombs planted
593Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,929
AWP3,006
P901,976
Negev1,370
MP91,257

Lifetime map wins

4,050inferno
2,264dust2
1,655nuke
889vertigo
795train
397cbble
335office
236italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

87Matches
51%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
100.2ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1090%1.5716.9
Inferno771%1.5913.3
Nuke1100%1.6226.0
Dust21100%1.7816.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
610msReaction time
33.6%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
9.17HE damage / grenade
4.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.6367% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno0–13-0.0625%24 Jul
mirage10–00.2218%4 Jun
office8–130.0029%4 Jun
mirage13–80.078%31 May
ancient11–130.0614%29 May
dust213–30.0312%29 May
mirage13–90.0013%29 May
mirage13–70.0018%28 May
dust213–50.0515%28 May
cache2–130.0338%28 May
cache7–00.1710%26 May
inferno6–13-0.0311%26 May
anubis13–50.1119%26 May
nuke7–13-0.0517%26 May
ancient7–130.0612%26 May
dust213–100.0921%26 May
ancient11–130.1113%25 May
inferno3–130.0316%24 May
ancient13–40.0515%24 May
office4–13-0.0318%13 May
mirage9–130.0913%13 May
anubis3–130.0213%12 May
nuke7–13-0.0021%11 May
ancient3–13-0.0120%11 May
inferno8–130.0212%11 May
mirage5–130.0020%11 May
cache8–13-0.0112%10 May
ancient8–130.0819%10 May
dust22–13-0.0716%10 May
mirage12–120.0416%7 May
inferno6–13-0.0313%6 May
cache4–130.0219%6 May
mirage13–50.0916%28 Feb
inferno8–130.0120%25 Feb
train3–130.028%25 Feb
inferno6–13-0.019%24 Feb
mirage10–130.018%24 Feb
inferno13–90.0122%23 Feb
mirage11–130.0141%23 Feb
office13–30.0725%22 Feb
anubis13–60.0117%22 Feb
office5–130.0126%22 Feb
nuke15–15-0.0122%31 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0322%31 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0311%29 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0219%29 Jan
dust22–00.000%29 Jan
office13–80.0148%27 Jan
office13–20.0414%26 Jan
mirage4–130.0719%23 Jan
mirage11–13-0.1012%17 Jan
inferno16–130.0026%17 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0412%16 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0419%16 Jan
dust25–13-0.0521%13 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0426%13 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0319%13 Jan
inferno10–130.0018%12 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0219%4 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0620%1 Jan
mirage13–40.2315%1 Jan
overpass6–13-0.0936%31 Dec
train9–10.039%28 Dec
mirage15–15-0.0816%28 Dec
mirage13–11-0.059%28 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0018%27 Dec
overpass13–7-0.006%27 Dec
inferno13–16-0.0117%26 Dec
mirage13–30.017%26 Dec
dust28–13-0.0418%26 Dec
mirage12–16-0.0315%24 Dec
vertigo13–100.0012%23 Dec
vertigo12–120.0310%23 Dec
inferno13–11-0.0118%21 Dec
vertigo12–120.0914%20 Dec
vertigo12–120.0615%19 Dec
ancient4–13-0.0311%19 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0914%12 Dec
mirage13–7-0.0215%11 Dec
ancient13–70.0020%11 Dec
inferno8–10.1918%11 Dec
nuke10–13-0.0412%10 Dec
inferno13–10.0212%10 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0314%10 Dec
inferno8–130.0519%9 Dec
mirage13–90.0016%8 Dec
mirage16–120.0215%7 Dec
ancient13–2-0.0111%6 Dec
mirage9–130.0310%6 Dec
mirage13–11-0.0214%4 Dec
ancient13–11-0.0416%4 Dec
inferno13–8-0.0214%2 Dec
office13–4-0.0612%1 Dec
office13–90.0126%1 Dec
office8–13-0.0313%4 Oct
office11–130.0141%3 Oct
office13–90.0315%3 Oct
inferno13–90.0319%25 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0213%25 Sept
overpass3–130.0511%24 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →