trippasnippa

trippasnippa — CS2 Stats

VA76561198142579975[U:1:182314247]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,041Tracked matches70%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,769Purple band · top ~21.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 27 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,769 -2,981 27 Jul8 Sept · 19 days played
15,29920,114peak 20,11427 Jul8 Sept
20,492Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-07-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,345 below peak (20,114)
  • -2,540 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,231 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtrippasnippaFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,769 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning50
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50446Last 10050%Win rateLWWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility3.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.0
Utility3.5
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time625ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 625ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–1 · eldorado, 29 Aug
60%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · nuke, 5 Sept
438msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 10 Aug
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB27141352%-0.02
cacheA1710759%-0.02
nukeB147750%-0.03
ancientB126650%-0.02
dust2B115645%-0.04
infernoA85363%-0.02
anubisD61517%-0.03
debris21150%0.00
eldorado21150%0.01
fachwerk1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

90Matches
57%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
63.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4055%0.8212.1
Inferno1457%0.9312.9
Dust21145%0.9512.9
Nuke850%0.669.6
Ancient540%0.7913.4
Train580%0.8610.8
Cache580%0.709.6
Overpass1100%1.0014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
620msReaction time
51.7%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
5.50HE damage / grenade
3.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4052 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–13-0.1114%17 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0813%17 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0423%16 Sept
mirage13–30.0129%16 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0913%16 Sept
mirage13–110.0211%16 Sept
ancient13–90.0429%16 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0519%15 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0522%13 Sept
cache13–7-0.0216%13 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0117%13 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0521%13 Sept
dust210–13-0.0222%12 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0321%12 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0232%12 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0713%11 Sept
nuke13–2-0.0419%11 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0212%11 Sept
dust213–3-0.0315%11 Sept
cache13–60.0319%10 Sept
dust26–13-0.0718%10 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0511%9 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0721%8 Sept
cache13–100.0217%8 Sept
cache13–70.0621%8 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0312%7 Sept
mirage13–70.0221%7 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0422%5 Sept
cache13–40.016%5 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0511%5 Sept
nuke5–13-0.1060%5 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0135%5 Sept
dust213–110.0222%5 Sept
inferno16–13-0.0217%4 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0619%4 Sept
dust210–13-0.046%4 Sept
nuke13–70.0024%4 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0416%4 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0628%3 Sept
cache10–13-0.1119%3 Sept
cache8–13-0.0132%1 Sept
cache15–15-0.0417%1 Sept
debris8–8-0.0121%1 Sept
anubis9–130.0119%29 Aug
cache5–13-0.0430%29 Aug
dust29–13-0.0119%29 Aug
nuke13–40.0117%29 Aug
eldorado9–10.1755%29 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0531%27 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0638%27 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0732%27 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0418%27 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0324%27 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0922%27 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0327%26 Aug
mirage13–30.1022%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0415%26 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0442%26 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0918%26 Aug
cache13–5-0.0219%25 Aug
dust26–13-0.0617%25 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0418%25 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0321%25 Aug
nuke13–60.1024%25 Aug
cache13–8-0.0013%25 Aug
dust213–4-0.019%24 Aug
debris9–40.0222%17 Aug
eldorado2–9-0.1520%17 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0011%17 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0821%14 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0311%14 Aug
cache13–9-0.0517%11 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0710%11 Aug
fachwerk12–12-0.0317%10 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0123%10 Aug
inferno9–10.0517%10 Aug
ancient13–70.0013%10 Aug
mirage13–60.0229%10 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0423%10 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0912%10 Aug
cache13–9-0.0234%10 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0514%9 Aug
dust213–4-0.0625%9 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0426%9 Aug
mirage13–60.0320%9 Aug
mirage11–13-0.055%9 Aug
cache13–10-0.047%9 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0116%7 Aug
mirage15–150.0024%7 Aug
cache8–130.0216%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0524%7 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0317%5 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0021%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0225%28 Jul
mirage13–100.0228%28 Jul
dust210–13-0.1013%28 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0216%28 Jul
cache5–13-0.0920%28 Jul
dust213–6-0.0313%27 Jul
ancient13–100.0215%27 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →