brett — CS2 Stats

76561198140337447[U:1:180071719]✓ No bans

6,053Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.8 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,830 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84

Positioning62

Utility84

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT83–16–1Last 10083%Win rateLWLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4

Aggression7.0

Utility8.4

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 84 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4

Positioning6.2

Utility8.4

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time561ms−45ms

first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms

Headshot accuracy22.6%+1.5%

first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — anubis 8–0

13–0Biggest win — mirage

18Longest win streak

2–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 12dust2Weakest map · 73% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	22	19–3	86%	0.03
ancient	S	19	14–5	74%	0.03
anubis	S	12	9–3	75%	0.06
cache	S	12	12–0	100%	0.05
dust2	S	11	8–3	73%	0.02
vertigo	S	9	8–1	89%	0.06
inferno	—	4	3–1	75%	0.06
office	—	4	4–0	100%	0.03
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
warden	—	2	2–0	100%	0.10
train	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (73% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,860Matches

57%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

87.8ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

21Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	958	56%	1.18	17.6
Ancient	601	60%	1.21	17.7
Dust2	381	51%	1.10	17.3
Anubis	362	54%	1.10	16.7
Vertigo	186	60%	1.12	17.4
Nuke	184	47%	1.08	17.0
Inferno	166	51%	1.08	16.4
Overpass	95	56%	1.13	17.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy

40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.4%Spray accuracy

81.5%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

560msReaction time

27.5%T opening success

56.6%CT opening success

0.78Enemies flashed / flash

14.7%Flash assists

9.62HE damage / grenade

21.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.4997% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	11–13	0.07	20%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.07	22%	19 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.06	19%	16 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	17%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.04	13%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.08	25%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	14%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.06	24%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.06	23%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.03	12%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.09	24%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	24%	6 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.03	29%	6 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.08	27%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.14	24%	5 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	21%	4 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.10	28%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.05	18%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.12	13%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.08	20%	30 Jun →
ancient	2–13	-0.06	30%	28 Jun →
cache	12–1	0.10	30%	26 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.09	17%	23 Jun →
cache	13–5	0.09	35%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	17%	22 Jun →
ancient	2–13	-0.04	33%	20 Jun →
nuke	4–13	0.04	18%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.05	38%	18 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	23%	12 Jun →
dust2	25–21	0.01	22%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.02	22%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.01	23%	4 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.10	22%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.01	42%	2 Jun →
anubis	13–1	0.07	21%	1 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.01	27%	31 May →
anubis	13–5	0.04	32%	27 May →
vertigo	13–1	0.09	15%	27 May →
anubis	8–0	0.28	39%	27 May →
vertigo	13–5	0.04	16%	25 May →
mirage	13–4	0.01	25%	24 May →
inferno	6–13	0.01	12%	24 May →
vertigo	13–3	-0.00	16%	23 May →
mirage	13–3	0.15	24%	23 May →
mirage	13–0	0.08	24%	22 May →
office	13–9	0.07	31%	22 May →
ancient	13–10	0.01	11%	22 May →
mirage	13–6	0.10	32%	21 May →
ancient	13–6	0.10	14%	21 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	31%	20 May →
train	13–6	-0.01	18%	20 May →
cache	13–5	-0.01	20%	20 May →
vertigo	13–3	0.05	15%	20 May →
cache	13–8	0.11	17%	20 May →
nuke	13–1	0.04	37%	20 May →
vertigo	13–10	0.03	26%	20 May →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	13%	19 May →
ancient	7–3	0.07	6%	19 May →
anubis	13–3	0.13	22%	19 May →
ancient	16–14	0.06	13%	18 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	26%	17 May →
anubis	13–3	0.13	19%	15 May →
ancient	13–7	0.05	20%	15 May →
cache	13–8	0.05	20%	15 May →
dust2	13–8	0.07	41%	13 May →
mirage	13–10	0.05	20%	13 May →
office	13–2	-0.01	22%	13 May →
vertigo	10–13	0.04	11%	13 May →
office	4–1	0.03	31%	13 May →
mirage	13–2	0.07	38%	12 May →
cache	13–4	0.06	19%	12 May →
ancient	13–4	0.09	15%	12 May →
vertigo	13–1	0.14	28%	10 May →
mirage	13–5	0.09	28%	10 May →
mirage	13–9	0.01	17%	8 May →
ancient	13–3	0.05	12%	8 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	25%	2 May →
cache	13–2	-0.06	50%	30 Apr →
cache	7–3	0.05	29%	30 Apr →
cache	13–7	-0.01	20%	30 Apr →
cache	13–7	0.04	27%	30 Apr →
overpass	13–10	-0.01	9%	30 Apr →
cache	13–2	0.08	20%	29 Apr →
cache	13–3	0.06	19%	29 Apr →
anubis	5–13	-0.07	5%	29 Apr →
ancient	7–13	-0.09	7%	29 Apr →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	6%	28 Apr →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	19%	28 Apr →
ancient	13–7	-0.06	16%	27 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.00	15%	27 Apr →
anubis	13–4	0.02	13%	27 Apr →
warden	13–5	0.10	14%	27 Apr →
office	13–2	0.02	33%	27 Apr →
dust2	13–1	0.01	21%	27 Apr →
ancient	13–5	0.01	10%	27 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.04	29%	26 Apr →
vertigo	13–7	0.08	20%	26 Apr →
anubis	13–4	0.03	18%	26 Apr →
warden	13–3	0.10	33%	25 Apr →
alpine	13–0	0.15	41%	25 Apr →