ฆ่าล้างเผ่าพันธ์ — CS2 Stats

76561198139380495[U:1:179114767]

1,044Tracked matches30%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating18,585Purple band · top ~14.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19754 of 42133 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGฆ่าล้างเผ่าพันธ์FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,585 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning43
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42571Last 10042%Win rateLWLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7
Aggression4.4
Utility4.3
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 41% on T to 24% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning4.3
Utility4.3
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time613ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 13–4
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 21infernoWeakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2114767%-0.02
dust2C2071335%-0.01
anubisC1761135%-0.01
infernoD1741324%-0.02
mirageC125742%-0.02
cacheB115645%-0.03
nuke21150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

420Matches
52%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
86.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10153%1.1717.8
Inferno8755%1.1617.4
Anubis8154%1.2017.6
Vertigo4553%1.0917.0
Mirage4448%0.9315.4
Dust22938%0.9114.3
Nuke1145%1.1216.7
Train956%1.2118.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
29.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.0%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
607msReaction time
41.1%T opening success
23.5%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
6.65HE damage / grenade
6.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 23.5451% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.0527%21 Aug
cache13–7-0.0119%21 Aug
anubis5–130.1020%21 Aug
dust28–130.0112%20 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0232%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.0128%20 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0129%19 Aug
cache0–50.0114%19 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0216%18 Aug
dust210–130.0219%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0415%18 Aug
dust26–130.0122%18 Aug
cache12–16-0.0527%18 Aug
dust23–13-0.0535%18 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0233%17 Aug
dust22–13-0.069%17 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0616%17 Aug
dust21–13-0.0130%17 Aug
inferno12–160.0119%17 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0316%15 Aug
inferno13–90.0018%15 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0317%8 Aug
mirage13–00.0230%8 Aug
nuke13–90.0022%8 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0120%8 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0919%8 Aug
dust213–2-0.0219%8 Aug
dust213–40.1226%8 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0441%8 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0721%7 Aug
ancient13–10-0.059%7 Aug
dust213–16-0.0433%7 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0317%7 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0234%7 Aug
cache1–13-0.0525%7 Aug
inferno0–13-0.0336%7 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0120%7 Aug
dust28–130.0040%7 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0423%7 Aug
ancient13–110.0524%6 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0715%6 Aug
dust213–11-0.0123%6 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0618%6 Aug
anubis13–60.0721%6 Aug
cache8–13-0.0018%6 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0419%5 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0217%5 Aug
inferno10–130.0118%5 Aug
dust26–130.0438%4 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0311%4 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0419%4 Aug
mirage11–130.0124%4 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0626%4 Aug
cache8–13-0.0330%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0724%4 Aug
mirage13–50.0121%4 Aug
dust213–11-0.0017%4 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0423%3 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0419%3 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0217%3 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0721%3 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0015%3 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0041%2 Aug
cache6–13-0.0124%2 Aug
anubis13–110.0215%2 Aug
cache13–10-0.0127%2 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0337%2 Aug
dust213–40.0221%2 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0026%1 Aug
ancient13–90.0525%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.028%1 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0221%1 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0330%1 Aug
anubis9–130.0014%1 Aug
anubis9–130.0415%1 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0717%31 Jul
inferno9–130.0127%31 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0021%31 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0313%30 Jul
ancient7–20.0522%30 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0623%30 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0911%30 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0117%30 Jul
dust213–50.0314%30 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0318%30 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0623%29 Jul
ancient10–130.0221%29 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0320%29 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0628%28 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0618%28 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0220%28 Jul
anubis7–0-0.0144%28 Jul
cache13–9-0.0317%28 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0214%28 Jul
cache13–9-0.0416%27 Jul
inferno13–80.0519%27 Jul
dust210–13-0.0315%27 Jul
cache13–11-0.0713%27 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0818%27 Jul
anubis13–80.0223%27 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →