piepie

piepie — CS2 Stats

CA76561198138864974[U:1:178599246]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,376Tracked matches72%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,856Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6209 of 222621 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−334Premier CS Rating · 27,190 → 26,856
0Faceit ELO · 2,019 → 2,019
+12Tracked matches · now 2,376
+5.7ppWin rate · 66.7% → 72.4%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 8 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,856 +731 8 Aug17 Sept · 23 days played
26,12528,382peak 28,3828 Aug17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,019 +0 28 Aug10 Sept · 4 observations
2,0192,019peak 2,01928 Aug10 Sept
28,593Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,019Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,019
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 481 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,526 below peak (28,382)
  • -1,526 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,144 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpiepiePREMIER26,856 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,019csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning53
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56386Last 10056%Win rateWLWLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 1541 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch2.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.3
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time562ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 12 Sept
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 7 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · dust2, 1 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 10 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 68% over 19nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32171553%0.00
cacheS1913668%-0.00
dust2A1810856%0.01
anubisA106460%-0.00
ancientC73443%0.01
nukeD51420%-0.03
infernoA53260%0.01
overpass220100%0.03
train1010%-0.03
office110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,677Matches
56%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
75.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17351%1.1415.2
Dust27362%1.0514.8
Ancient7267%1.0315.4
Anubis6156%1.0515.5
Inferno5353%0.8513.7
Nuke2955%0.8813.7
Overpass2658%1.1114.2
Vertigo2446%0.9716.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.9%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
544msReaction time
33.2%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
5.64HE damage / grenade
12.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2323% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–10.058%17 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0511%17 Sept
cache13–100.0016%14 Sept
cache1–9-0.0710%14 Sept
cache13–10.0332%13 Sept
mirage13–100.0414%13 Sept
cache6–10.0825%13 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0225%13 Sept
overpass13–90.0410%13 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0416%13 Sept
cache12–12-0.0318%13 Sept
anubis13–30.1322%12 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0115%10 Sept
nuke13–50.0436%7 Sept
cache13–11-0.0321%7 Sept
train10–13-0.0314%7 Sept
ancient13–110.0014%7 Sept
mirage10–00.0317%3 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0024%3 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0013%3 Sept
inferno16–14-0.0311%3 Sept
mirage11–130.0524%2 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0425%2 Sept
inferno6–130.0319%2 Sept
mirage13–20.0414%2 Sept
mirage8–130.0126%1 Sept
cache6–00.1133%1 Sept
office13–60.0317%1 Sept
cache13–100.0117%1 Sept
dust213–50.0811%1 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0130%31 Aug
overpass13–80.0320%31 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0524%31 Aug
dust213–80.0218%30 Aug
ancient13–50.0119%30 Aug
dust213–80.0416%30 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0611%30 Aug
cache8–13-0.0410%30 Aug
mirage13–20.0017%30 Aug
cache13–9-0.0217%28 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0018%28 Aug
cache13–50.0516%28 Aug
dust23–13-0.0521%27 Aug
cache13–80.0423%27 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0013%27 Aug
inferno13–50.0810%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0519%25 Aug
cache13–8-0.0523%25 Aug
dust28–13-0.0532%25 Aug
mirage13–30.0124%24 Aug
dust215–150.0516%24 Aug
dust210–13-0.0617%24 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0318%24 Aug
dust29–13-0.0435%21 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0621%21 Aug
dust28–13-0.0412%21 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0110%21 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0319%20 Aug
dust213–10-0.0718%19 Aug
mirage13–60.0615%19 Aug
cache5–130.0118%19 Aug
ancient8–130.0315%19 Aug
cache5–13-0.0614%19 Aug
dust213–20.029%19 Aug
cache16–14-0.0419%18 Aug
dust213–30.048%18 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0018%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.0113%18 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0016%18 Aug
dust213–20.0117%18 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0812%18 Aug
cache13–90.0123%18 Aug
dust213–80.0623%17 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0116%17 Aug
mirage15–150.0411%17 Aug
inferno13–110.0112%17 Aug
dust211–13-0.0519%15 Aug
dust213–30.0818%15 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0029%15 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0314%15 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0211%14 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0632%14 Aug
cache13–110.0022%13 Aug
ancient13–50.0915%13 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0325%12 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0213%11 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0119%11 Aug
mirage6–10.0115%11 Aug
anubis13–40.0127%11 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0710%10 Aug
mirage2–130.0126%10 Aug
mirage9–30.0824%10 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0117%10 Aug
mirage13–0-0.0018%10 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0028%8 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0311%8 Aug
cache7–13-0.0617%8 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0610%8 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0511%8 Aug
dust213–90.0721%8 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →