Rudis Rederei

Rudis Rederei — CS2 Stats

DE76561198138770234[U:1:178504506]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

365Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,265 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,834 -525 9 Jan – 8 Mar · 19 days played
13,71117,484peak 17,4849 Jan8 Mar
17,831Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,265Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-01-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,265
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 86 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRudis RedereiFACEITLevel 7 · 1,265 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,265csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning47
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56–44Last 10056%Win rateWWLWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −5.3pp headshot accuracy · −81ms reaction

Win rate up 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.3
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch2.6

Strong T-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.91 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 50% on T to 26% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.7
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time629ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 5 Mar →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · nuke, 21 Sept →
461msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 12 Feb →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 20 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
12–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 24dust2Weakest map · 45% over 33
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3315–1845%0.01
infernoS2417–771%0.03
mirageA1810–856%0.01
nukeA159–660%-0.00
cacheA74–357%0.01
ancient—31–233%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 33). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

137Matches
56%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
74.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23667%1.2515.7
Mirage3342%0.9013.2
Inferno2458%1.1315.3
Nuke1258%1.1814.8
Ancient771%0.8011.7
Overpass520%0.6911.6
Anubis10%0.9313.0
Cache1100%1.4021.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
632msReaction time
50.3%T opening success
25.8%CT opening success
0.91Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
6.95HE damage / grenade
6.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 25.8318% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 33 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–40.1414%29 Sept →
dust213–110.0014%29 Sept →
ancient8–130.0314%22 Sept →
dust213–50.0816%21 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.1043%21 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0218%20 Sept →
cache13–60.0215%20 Sept →
cache13–90.0011%19 Sept →
dust213–11-0.058%19 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.060%19 Sept →
dust29–130.0020%26 Aug →
inferno10–130.0115%26 Aug →
cache13–80.0424%22 Aug →
dust28–130.0020%22 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0326%19 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0118%19 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0612%26 May →
cache8–13-0.0224%24 May →
cache13–50.0930%20 May →
mirage8–13-0.0520%21 Mar →
inferno9–40.0924%21 Mar →
nuke9–30.0924%21 Mar →
dust210–130.055%18 Mar →
dust213–10.0411%18 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.035%11 Mar →
inferno13–110.0315%8 Mar →
mirage13–70.0929%8 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0425%7 Mar →
inferno13–110.0114%5 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0411%5 Mar →
dust211–130.0330%5 Mar →
inferno13–20.1424%5 Mar →
inferno16–140.0527%5 Mar →
dust213–50.0217%1 Mar →
inferno13–90.0523%1 Mar →
dust213–70.0010%1 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0111%1 Mar →
inferno1–13-0.0523%1 Mar →
inferno13–20.0820%28 Feb →
mirage8–1-0.0019%28 Feb →
inferno13–9-0.0116%28 Feb →
nuke13–50.0624%27 Feb →
inferno4–130.0012%27 Feb →
mirage13–80.0117%27 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0315%27 Feb →
nuke13–80.0116%26 Feb →
mirage13–40.0432%26 Feb →
mirage13–00.095%20 Feb →
inferno9–70.068%20 Feb →
nuke4–9-0.0637%20 Feb →
dust216–140.0320%18 Feb →
dust213–100.0633%16 Feb →
dust210–13-0.0213%16 Feb →
dust210–13-0.0522%15 Feb →
dust213–160.0716%15 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0020%14 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0219%14 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0310%14 Feb →
nuke6–9-0.136%13 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0118%13 Feb →
nuke13–90.0620%13 Feb →
dust213–90.0816%12 Feb →
inferno13–30.0327%12 Feb →
dust213–110.0315%9 Feb →
dust213–80.0420%9 Feb →
nuke13–60.0517%8 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0235%8 Feb →
dust213–80.1413%7 Feb →
ancient4–13-0.0117%7 Feb →
inferno0–9-0.0810%6 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.035%2 Feb →
mirage13–160.0414%2 Feb →
mirage13–70.027%2 Feb →
nuke13–60.0110%2 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0610%1 Feb →
nuke10–130.0119%1 Feb →
mirage13–100.0119%31 Jan →
inferno16–140.0522%31 Jan →
dust210–13-0.0411%31 Jan →
inferno6–1-0.040%31 Jan →
dust24–130.0115%31 Jan →
inferno13–80.0423%31 Jan →
mirage13–90.0612%30 Jan →
dust211–130.0525%30 Jan →
mirage13–110.0313%30 Jan →
mirage7–13-0.0120%30 Jan →
dust213–10-0.0213%27 Jan →
dust29–130.0515%23 Jan →
nuke10–13-0.0112%23 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.0212%22 Jan →
mirage10–130.0214%19 Jan →
dust21–13-0.0520%17 Jan →
inferno13–100.0714%17 Jan →
nuke16–130.0714%16 Jan →
inferno13–110.0224%15 Jan →
dust213–70.0618%15 Jan →
dust28–13-0.0528%14 Jan →
inferno4–13-0.0121%14 Jan →
inferno10–130.1415%11 Jan →
inferno13–4-0.0511%9 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.