🎵Natsu🎵 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198138668738[U:1:178403010]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,181Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,938Hours in CS

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating28,627Top 1% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1848 of 259155 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,580 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (40 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 28,627 → 28,627

0Faceit ELO · 2,580 → 2,580

+142Tracked matches · now 2,181

−30.0ppWin rate · 70.0% → 40.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,627 +0 29 Aug – 22 Sept · 5 observations

Faceit ELO: 2,580 +0 29 Aug – 22 Sept · 5 observations

28,627Peak Premier on CSDB

2,580Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

38Days played since 2026-07-31

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,580
0 over 30 days · steady
Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 420 to go
Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 28,627
0 over 30 days · steady
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,373 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-29
Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	53.3%	50.9%
Shot accuracy	20.2%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.00	1.09
Match win rate	50.6%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning77

Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–48Last 10052%Win rateLWWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 26%
Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

5–5 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 485ms

Last 20

8–12 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 489ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim9.2

Utility4.2

Positioning7.7

Opening Duels6.7

Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 79% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 79% on T to 59% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning7.7

Utility4.2

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels8.6

Win Impact1.7

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time501ms+14ms

first ⅓ avg 488ms → last ⅓ avg 501ms

Headshot accuracy21.2%−1.3%

first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 25 Sept →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 16 Aug →

391msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · anubis, 12 Oct →

13–3Biggest win · nuke, 10 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

12–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

18Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 70% over 10cacheWeakest map · 38% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	A	22	12–10	55%	0.01
anubis	A	21	13–8	62%	0.01
inferno	C	21	9–12	43%	0.00
cache	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.01
nuke	C	10	4–6	40%	0.03
dust2	S	10	7–3	70%	0.02
mirage	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

331,852Lifetime kills

1.00K/D

10,173Matches

50.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players

53.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players

20.2%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 10 players

42,441MVPs

6,938Hours (in match)

6,246Bombs planted

2,775Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4795,547

AWP65,362

Desert Eagle54,765

M4A4 / M4A1-S27,946

P2000 / USP-S20,153

Glock-1811,605

P2505,887

P905,777

Knife4,905

SG 5534,689

Lifetime map wins

32,447dust2

19,794inferno

9,602nuke

3,519train

2,588cbble

1,282vertigo

304lake

240office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,655Matches

50%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

85.5ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	261	50%	1.12	17.6
Dust2	221	51%	1.10	18.1
Anubis	211	56%	1.14	18.6
Inferno	198	49%	1.11	18.0
Nuke	157	56%	1.23	18.5
Mirage	146	47%	1.12	18.2
Cache	65	51%	1.18	17.4
Overpass	39	41%	1.24	19.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy

41.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.4%Spray accuracy

78.5%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

499msReaction time

78.9%T opening success

58.6%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

6.1%Flash assists

7.90HE damage / grenade

3.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.2089 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	4–13	-0.01	30%	31 Oct →
mirage	13–10	0.04	25%	29 Oct →
ancient	13–9	0.01	13%	28 Oct →
anubis	13–5	0.10	35%	28 Oct →
cache	14–16	0.03	30%	27 Oct →
ancient	10–13	0.03	19%	25 Oct →
nuke	13–8	0.07	23%	25 Oct →
inferno	14–16	0.03	13%	25 Oct →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	26%	25 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	17%	24 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	17%	24 Oct →
nuke	11–13	0.02	17%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.07	16%	23 Oct →
inferno	4–13	0.02	23%	23 Oct →
ancient	14–16	-0.00	22%	22 Oct →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	10%	19 Oct →
cache	8–13	-0.04	18%	19 Oct →
anubis	13–5	0.02	32%	19 Oct →
ancient	13–7	0.09	36%	19 Oct →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	24%	19 Oct →
cache	10–13	-0.02	14%	18 Oct →
dust2	7–13	0.04	29%	18 Oct →
ancient	3–13	-0.08	18%	18 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.00	36%	18 Oct →
inferno	11–13	0.02	19%	18 Oct →
ancient	6–13	-0.08	23%	18 Oct →
dust2	16–12	0.01	19%	17 Oct →
anubis	6–13	0.04	14%	17 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.00	15%	17 Oct →
nuke	13–5	0.06	18%	17 Oct →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	20%	17 Oct →
ancient	16–14	-0.02	16%	17 Oct →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	18%	16 Oct →
anubis	16–13	0.01	11%	16 Oct →
cache	13–11	0.03	20%	16 Oct →
inferno	5–13	-0.09	6%	15 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	18%	13 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.00	21%	13 Oct →
inferno	10–13	0.02	27%	12 Oct →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	15%	12 Oct →
anubis	11–13	0.03	15%	12 Oct →
anubis	9–13	0.03	28%	10 Oct →
cache	10–13	-0.03	19%	10 Oct →
cache	6–13	-0.05	15%	10 Oct →
nuke	11–13	0.08	16%	10 Oct →
ancient	13–7	0.10	16%	10 Oct →
inferno	16–14	0.01	8%	10 Oct →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	9%	10 Oct →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	24%	10 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.00	18%	8 Oct →
ancient	8–13	0.01	19%	8 Oct →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	22%	8 Oct →
nuke	13–5	0.14	22%	8 Oct →
ancient	7–13	-0.09	13%	8 Oct →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	24%	4 Oct →
ancient	13–9	0.02	21%	4 Oct →
anubis	13–9	0.05	15%	4 Oct →
ancient	13–5	0.14	21%	25 Sept →
anubis	13–6	0.01	28%	25 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.01	26%	22 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.01	17%	22 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.03	17%	17 Sept →
inferno	13–4	0.10	29%	17 Sept →
ancient	22–20	0.01	15%	12 Sept →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	15%	10 Sept →
anubis	13–10	0.03	31%	10 Sept →
nuke	13–3	-0.02	13%	10 Sept →
anubis	16–12	-0.01	17%	8 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.03	21%	8 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.04	33%	7 Sept →
dust2	25–21	0.04	20%	6 Sept →
inferno	13–4	0.11	23%	6 Sept →
anubis	13–7	-0.00	25%	6 Sept →
anubis	13–5	0.12	14%	6 Sept →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	22%	4 Sept →
dust2	10–13	0.01	21%	4 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	22%	3 Sept →
anubis	3–13	-0.04	20%	3 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.03	23%	1 Sept →
ancient	13–7	0.00	17%	28 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.04	21%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.01	16%	28 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.07	10%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.07	32%	28 Aug →
inferno	17–19	0.04	19%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	26%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.10	37%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	15%	17 Aug →
inferno	19–17	0.07	26%	16 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.03	50%	16 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	24%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.01	22%	7 Aug →
mirage	17–19	0.00	28%	7 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.07	23%	7 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.08	18%	7 Aug →
cache	13–16	0.00	13%	6 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.02	11%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.06	22%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	34%	1 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.01	17%	31 Jul →