RikkeBest

RikkeBest — CS2 Stats

FI76561198137671158[U:1:177405430]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,281Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,449Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating11,747Blue band · top ~45.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,188 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 23 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,747 +3,303 13 Aug19 Sept · 21 days played
8,44412,348peak 12,34813 Aug19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,188 +0 17 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
1,1881,188peak 1,18817 Sept18 Sept
12,508Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,188Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-07-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,188
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 13 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 601 below peak (12,348)
  • +821 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,253 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,764), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate37.7%44.8%45.7%8.0% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.821.041.050.23 short
Match win rate43.2%45.2%45.7%2.5% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 7 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRikkeBestFACEITLevel 6 · 1,188 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER11,747 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,188csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning63
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateWLWWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim4.6
Utility6.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch5.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 61% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 42% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning6.3
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time578ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 11 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–0 · ancient, 21 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · mirage, 28 Aug
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 14 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
126In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 17anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA1710759%-0.00
ancientS1712571%-0.00
infernoB168850%-0.02
mirageB158753%-0.01
dust2A148657%0.01
anubisD113827%-0.04
cacheC83538%-0.03
eldorado110100%0.01
overpass1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

25,432Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
1,977Matches
43.2%Match win rate
37.7%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,361MVPs
821Hours (in match)
2,380Bombs planted
553Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,320inferno
3,004nuke
1,620dust2
845vertigo
269train
20office
8ar_shoots
2ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

168Matches
54%Win rate
0.80Avg K/D
62.1ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3447%0.8211.8
Nuke3361%0.8311.2
Overpass2759%0.8012.0
Inferno2462%0.9513.3
Mirage1759%0.8311.7
Vertigo1547%0.638.9
Anubis1127%0.6410.6
Dust2650%0.618.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
73.6%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
587msReaction time
42.2%T opening success
57.9%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
9.43HE damage / grenade
8.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.8273% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–14-0.0329%19 Sept
nuke9–130.0122%19 Sept
mirage13–90.0413%17 Sept
dust216–14-0.0013%16 Sept
ancient14–16-0.029%15 Sept
nuke13–6-0.014%15 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0116%14 Sept
nuke10–130.0218%11 Sept
mirage5–13-0.077%11 Sept
inferno9–30.1530%11 Sept
inferno5–9-0.147%11 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0110%9 Sept
cache9–13-0.0127%9 Sept
ancient13–11-0.029%9 Sept
dust213–40.1425%9 Sept
ancient13–50.0213%2 Sept
anubis7–130.0015%2 Sept
dust213–110.0517%1 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0122%1 Sept
dust213–60.0016%1 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0417%31 Aug
cache16–13-0.0518%31 Aug
anubis1–13-0.056%31 Aug
nuke13–10-0.042%31 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0010%31 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0420%31 Aug
nuke13–40.1216%28 Aug
mirage13–80.0116%28 Aug
ancient11–13-0.029%28 Aug
dust210–13-0.0322%28 Aug
mirage4–130.0115%28 Aug
anubis13–11-0.066%27 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0716%27 Aug
dust213–30.0932%27 Aug
ancient13–60.1121%27 Aug
nuke13–90.0828%27 Aug
cache9–130.0418%27 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0423%26 Aug
dust22–13-0.0610%26 Aug
mirage3–9-0.0742%26 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0216%26 Aug
dust24–13-0.080%26 Aug
dust25–13-0.069%26 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0713%26 Aug
nuke13–9-0.029%25 Aug
mirage16–140.0413%25 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0530%25 Aug
dust210–130.014%25 Aug
anubis13–16-0.018%24 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0420%24 Aug
mirage13–50.0412%24 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0921%22 Aug
nuke4–9-0.2219%22 Aug
eldorado9–50.0135%22 Aug
inferno13–80.0223%21 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0210%21 Aug
ancient6–00.0850%21 Aug
inferno13–100.0213%21 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0314%20 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0711%20 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0420%19 Aug
nuke13–40.0515%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0115%19 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0323%19 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0028%15 Aug
cache2–13-0.1124%15 Aug
nuke1–9-0.1317%15 Aug
overpass8–8-0.058%15 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1238%15 Aug
cache13–110.0433%15 Aug
ancient16–140.0312%15 Aug
mirage13–6-0.033%15 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0720%15 Aug
cache5–13-0.0413%15 Aug
ancient6–2-0.0217%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.047%15 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0028%14 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0228%14 Aug
dust213–100.0325%14 Aug
dust213–11-0.0017%14 Aug
nuke13–40.1214%14 Aug
ancient13–1-0.0319%14 Aug
dust24–13-0.0131%14 Aug
inferno7–130.0126%13 Aug
nuke13–70.0036%13 Aug
dust213–8-0.0012%13 Aug
cache6–13-0.1012%13 Aug
ancient13–90.027%11 Aug
nuke3–13-0.098%11 Aug
nuke14–160.0413%11 Aug
anubis10–13-0.048%11 Aug
cache13–7-0.0318%11 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0024%8 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0320%8 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0119%8 Aug
inferno13–70.0719%8 Aug
nuke13–70.0417%8 Aug
ancient14–16-0.038%5 Aug
ancient16–120.0319%4 Aug
anubis13–8-0.054%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →