Ukkis Äitis — CS2 Stats

UG76561198136609219[U:1:176343491]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

531Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player

CSDB Leaderboard#67954 of 260006 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,161 +1,442 16 Sept – 27 Oct · 7 days played

21,370Peak Premier in tracked matches

42Days played since 2025-08-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51

Positioning55

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–32–10Last 10058%Win rateWLWWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · −94ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 9%
Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 9%
Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

10–10 · 50% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 11%
Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim5.1

Utility5.4

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1

Positioning5.5

Utility5.4

Mechanics5.6

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time612ms−5ms

first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms

Headshot accuracy11.5%−1.9%

first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 11.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–6 · agency, 20 Aug →

36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · agency, 24 Aug →

445msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · dust2, 2 Oct →

13–0Biggest win · agency, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak

5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 8dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
agency	A	61	38–23	62%	0.01
dust2	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.05
mirage	S	8	6–2	75%	-0.02
ancient	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.05
nuke	—	3	3–0	100%	0.01
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03
alpine	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.05
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.08
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
italy	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01
golden	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.09
transit	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.12
rooftop	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7Matches

43%Win rate

0.66Avg K/D

67.0ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	2	50%	0.64	9.5
Nuke	2	100%	0.78	9.0
Ancient	2	0%	0.64	14.0
Mirage	1	0%	0.53	9.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.8%Headshot accuracy

31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.6%Spray accuracy

75.1%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

599msReaction time

39.7%T opening success

39.8%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

4.8%Flash assists

7.85HE damage / grenade

7.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.8215% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.7301% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
shelter	13–10	-0.08	4%	2 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	14%	2 Oct →
dust2	13–2	0.00	8%	2 Oct →
mirage	13–1	-0.03	3%	25 Sept →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	13%	25 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	7%	29 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.09	3%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	15%	29 Jun →
anubis	13–16	-0.04	17%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	10%	23 Jun →
cache	13–9	-0.02	12%	5 May →
cache	11–13	-0.03	19%	29 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.04	10%	28 Apr →
dust2	3–13	-0.12	6%	10 Apr →
ancient	3–13	-0.10	10%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.03	13%	17 Mar →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	11%	2 Mar →
alpine	13–5	-0.04	18%	1 Mar →
alpine	7–13	-0.07	16%	17 Feb →
agency	9–13	-0.04	15%	20 Dec →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	11%	20 Dec →
agency	10–13	-0.07	13%	26 Nov →
agency	13–2	0.07	13%	24 Nov →
agency	13–1	0.07	11%	24 Nov →
agency	13–5	0.05	15%	17 Nov →
agency	6–13	-0.00	8%	17 Nov →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	5%	15 Nov →
agency	13–10	0.09	11%	15 Nov →
agency	13–5	-0.01	13%	15 Nov →
agency	13–8	0.01	23%	10 Nov →
agency	13–4	-0.04	8%	10 Nov →
agency	13–11	0.00	12%	6 Nov →
agency	13–2	0.03	15%	3 Nov →
agency	13–9	0.03	21%	3 Nov →
agency	13–5	-0.04	14%	29 Oct →
agency	13–7	-0.03	13%	29 Oct →
agency	13–1	0.11	17%	27 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	19%	27 Oct →
agency	13–3	0.01	21%	24 Oct →
agency	13–10	-0.02	12%	24 Oct →
agency	13–7	0.02	16%	19 Oct →
italy	13–9	0.09	12%	19 Oct →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	15%	19 Oct →
agency	13–2	-0.00	11%	19 Oct →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	24%	19 Oct →
train	13–11	0.01	33%	19 Oct →
agency	3–13	-0.02	23%	19 Oct →
agency	12–12	0.02	18%	17 Oct →
golden	6–13	-0.09	7%	17 Oct →
agency	9–13	-0.03	25%	17 Oct →
nuke	13–4	0.02	24%	15 Oct →
agency	13–6	0.00	10%	15 Oct →
agency	13–3	0.02	11%	15 Oct →
agency	10–13	0.05	19%	14 Oct →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	16%	14 Oct →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	24%	14 Oct →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	11%	14 Oct →
agency	13–7	0.06	8%	10 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.02	17%	10 Oct →
agency	12–12	-0.03	26%	10 Oct →
agency	13–8	-0.02	24%	10 Oct →
agency	9–13	0.03	27%	10 Oct →
agency	13–6	0.01	8%	9 Oct →
agency	13–0	0.02	17%	9 Oct →
agency	12–12	0.03	13%	9 Oct →
agency	13–5	0.01	21%	9 Oct →
agency	13–5	0.09	18%	9 Oct →
agency	13–8	0.08	22%	7 Oct →
agency	13–5	0.04	10%	7 Oct →
transit	4–9	-0.12	8%	2 Oct →
rooftop	8–8	0.00	11%	2 Oct →
agency	8–13	-0.04	10%	2 Oct →
agency	13–3	-0.01	10%	2 Oct →
agency	10–13	0.01	19%	24 Sept →
agency	12–12	0.06	23%	24 Sept →
agency	13–5	-0.02	6%	24 Sept →
agency	7–13	-0.04	16%	18 Sept →
agency	9–13	0.01	9%	18 Sept →
agency	13–8	0.01	13%	17 Sept →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	19%	17 Sept →
agency	13–4	-0.04	9%	17 Sept →
ancient	13–1	-0.05	7%	16 Sept →
agency	7–2	0.00	17%	16 Sept →
agency	13–10	0.00	12%	16 Sept →
agency	5–4	0.02	0%	16 Sept →
agency	12–12	-0.03	12%	16 Sept →
agency	12–12	0.03	20%	16 Sept →
agency	12–12	0.04	17%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–1	-0.01	6%	14 Sept →
agency	13–8	0.01	14%	14 Sept →
agency	12–12	0.07	16%	14 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	14%	14 Sept →
agency	13–11	-0.01	10%	14 Sept →
agency	9–13	-0.01	13%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–2	0.05	17%	25 Aug →
agency	2–13	-0.00	4%	25 Aug →
agency	11–13	-0.02	15%	24 Aug →
agency	13–6	-0.03	36%	24 Aug →
agency	13–6	0.17	14%	20 Aug →
agency	12–12	0.02	14%	11 Aug →