NUM06

NUM06 — CS2 Stats

MY76561198132093402[U:1:171827674]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,163Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,154Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating27,298Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4264 of 220457 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,900 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 3 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,298 +4,474 3 May16 Sept · 25 days played
19,10527,298peak 27,2983 May16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,900 +0 2 Sept7 Sept · 2 observations
1,9001,900peak 1,9002 Sept7 Sept
27,298Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,900Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-05-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,900
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 101 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,298
  • +7,834 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,702 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate37.5%46.8%48.3%10.8% short
Shot accuracy14.5%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.171.061.07above
Match win rate33.7%46.3%46.9%13.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNUM06FACEITLevel 8 · 1,900 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER27,298 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,900csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning53
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52471Last 10052%Win rateWWWWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility7.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.8

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.3
Utility7.6
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time583ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 15–15 · inferno, 10 May
50%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · dust2, 14 Jun
391msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 8 Sept
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 12 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W5Current streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 19dust2Weakest map · 41% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C29121741%0.00
mirageA1912763%0.00
nukeA1710759%-0.02
ancientA169756%0.00
infernoC94544%0.01
anubisA85363%0.01
cache1010%-0.04
overpass1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

180,610Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7,216Matches
33.7%Match win rate
37.5%Headshot %
14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
13,157MVPs
2,700Hours (in match)
4,591Bombs planted
1,011Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP54,135
AK-4734,265
SG 5534,544
AUG3,967
SSG 083,724

Lifetime map wins

12,682dust2
9,319inferno
2,587nuke
942train
894vertigo
102lake
72cbble
49office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,507Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
77.4ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient31647%1.0716.0
Inferno27051%1.0815.4
Mirage16143%0.9714.5
Nuke15555%1.0516.6
Anubis10751%0.9414.6
Dust210351%0.9914.4
Overpass4243%1.0415.2
Train3441%1.0515.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
74.2%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
590msReaction time
44.8%T opening success
39.3%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
12.2%Flash assists
9.46HE damage / grenade
16.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.2935% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–13-0.0126%16 Sept
ancient13–100.0720%16 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0621%13 Sept
mirage13–30.0023%12 Sept
mirage13–40.0211%12 Sept
mirage7–13-0.1023%12 Sept
dust213–11-0.0327%12 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0122%12 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0521%12 Sept
dust213–9-0.0125%12 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0115%12 Sept
ancient3–13-0.078%12 Sept
mirage13–60.0426%12 Sept
dust213–11-0.0220%12 Sept
dust213–60.0422%8 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0721%8 Sept
dust211–130.0332%4 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0421%30 Aug
mirage13–100.0019%30 Aug
nuke13–100.0313%30 Aug
dust210–13-0.0123%28 Aug
ancient13–60.0734%28 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0721%27 Aug
dust21–13-0.0225%27 Aug
dust213–80.0529%4 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0226%2 Aug
mirage5–13-0.073%2 Aug
dust213–11-0.0415%31 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0121%31 Jul
dust211–13-0.0011%30 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0330%28 Jul
dust213–110.0035%26 Jul
mirage8–130.0124%26 Jul
anubis13–40.0726%26 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0614%25 Jul
dust216–12-0.0413%25 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0420%24 Jul
anubis13–50.1031%24 Jul
inferno13–11-0.069%22 Jul
mirage13–70.0829%12 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0120%9 Jul
dust213–110.0518%9 Jul
ancient13–40.0222%6 Jul
dust24–13-0.0415%6 Jul
cache8–13-0.0434%5 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0724%5 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0514%1 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0530%1 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0321%1 Jul
nuke13–60.0017%30 Jun
anubis9–20.0143%30 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0023%30 Jun
nuke13–110.0124%29 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0129%29 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0122%29 Jun
ancient13–6-0.028%28 Jun
dust213–30.0431%28 Jun
dust27–13-0.0123%28 Jun
inferno13–40.0325%23 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0026%22 Jun
dust210–13-0.0128%14 Jun
ancient13–70.0427%14 Jun
dust211–130.0350%14 Jun
nuke28–25-0.0514%13 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0432%8 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0522%6 Jun
dust24–130.0021%6 Jun
inferno7–130.0418%2 Jun
overpass11–130.0022%2 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0411%18 May
inferno13–110.0626%18 May
dust22–130.0023%17 May
nuke12–16-0.0422%17 May
ancient13–70.1026%16 May
dust29–13-0.0235%16 May
mirage11–130.0816%16 May
mirage13–110.0328%16 May
dust213–160.0027%14 May
ancient6–130.0324%14 May
mirage13–70.0529%14 May
dust213–60.0318%14 May
dust216–12-0.0029%13 May
mirage13–90.0416%13 May
dust210–13-0.0223%13 May
dust29–13-0.0322%11 May
ancient16–120.0429%11 May
dust25–130.0033%11 May
anubis13–50.0025%10 May
inferno15–150.1021%10 May
ancient10–13-0.0516%10 May
dust214–16-0.0214%10 May
dust214–160.0529%10 May
ancient13–60.0120%9 May
inferno6–13-0.0426%9 May
nuke7–13-0.0221%9 May
inferno13–3-0.0116%9 May
ancient3–13-0.0620%9 May
nuke13–60.0342%9 May
mirage13–5-0.0126%9 May
mirage13–30.0721%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →