prødderick

prødderick — CS2 Stats

76561198129912559[U:1:169646831]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

178Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,520Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 178 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 8 Sep 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,610 +3,013 8 May7 Jun · 8 days played
18,49221,610peak 21,6108 May7 Jun
21,610Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2023-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 11 Sep 2026 and 20 Sep 2026.

Measured 11 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate54.5%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy24.9%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio2.061.061.07above
Match win rate35.5%46.3%46.9%11.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGprødderickFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning44
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50455Last 10050%Win rateLWLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +14.5pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 36%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 6122 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.4° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time620ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–0 · ancient, 28 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · dust2, 26 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 10 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 2 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12vertigoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB20101050%0.03
infernoC146843%0.02
dust2C135838%0.01
anubisS128467%0.01
trainC94544%0.00
overpassA85363%0.02
nukeA74357%0.01
vertigoD62433%0.02
mirage43175%0.05
office21150%0.02
cache2020%0.03
italy110100%-0.00
agency110100%-0.00
jura1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

139,211Lifetime kills
2.06K/D · Top 5% of Level 8 players
3,641Matches
35.5%Match win rate
54.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
24.9%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 8 players
7,586MVPs
1,371Hours (in match)
4,583Bombs planted
794Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,214dust2
2,993inferno
1,106cbble
1,053train
627nuke
398vertigo
94office
92safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

263Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
89.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10%1.0716.0
Nuke10%1.3121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.3%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
603msReaction time
20.3%T opening success
40.9%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
8.19HE damage / grenade
10.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.3081% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategyVertigo grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–16-0.0019%29 Aug
dust210–0-0.0450%29 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0142%28 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0221%28 Aug
ancient13–110.0135%27 Aug
office13–100.0619%27 Aug
vertigo10–130.0130%27 Aug
inferno11–130.0529%27 Aug
dust25–13-0.0012%26 Aug
dust23–00.01100%26 Aug
train11–13-0.0329%26 Aug
mirage10–20.0429%25 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0318%25 Aug
cache12–120.0619%9 May
cache12–120.0024%29 Apr
inferno5–130.0627%31 Mar
mirage8–130.0712%31 Mar
mirage13–00.0615%2 Jan
dust27–13-0.0023%2 Jan
office2–13-0.0116%2 Jan
italy13–6-0.0016%2 Jan
ancient9–130.0020%8 Jul
agency13–3-0.0032%11 Jun
vertigo13–60.0210%10 Jun
jura11–13-0.0828%10 Jun
dust27–30.0821%7 Jun
train13–50.0113%7 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0118%31 May
anubis13–40.0011%31 May
nuke6–3-0.0413%31 May
train13–80.1120%30 May
ancient13–90.0231%30 May
dust22–13-0.0221%24 May
ancient12–160.0214%24 May
dust25–13-0.0218%23 May
ancient13–70.0313%23 May
overpass12–120.039%21 May
train7–13-0.0418%21 May
anubis13–20.1517%16 May
dust213–10-0.0323%16 May
ancient6–10.0940%16 May
nuke9–13-0.0614%16 May
nuke9–13-0.0217%13 May
nuke13–100.0322%8 May
anubis8–20.0427%8 May
ancient8–13-0.0318%3 May
dust26–13-0.0124%3 May
train13–70.1014%3 May
inferno11–130.0120%3 May
inferno15–15-0.0021%30 Apr
train8–13-0.029%30 Apr
nuke16–140.0215%30 Apr
train5–13-0.089%30 Apr
ancient10–130.0219%30 Apr
anubis13–40.0918%11 Apr
train13–8-0.0316%11 Apr
train8–13-0.0215%6 Apr
dust211–130.0827%6 Apr
anubis8–130.0017%30 Mar
dust214–16-0.0027%30 Mar
ancient13–100.0625%30 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0318%30 Mar
dust210–13-0.0221%30 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0720%29 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0121%29 Mar
anubis16–13-0.0218%28 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0019%27 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0428%23 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0214%18 Mar
nuke13–20.1435%18 Mar
mirage13–20.0524%12 Jan
dust29–00.0722%30 Dec
ancient13–10.1129%30 Dec
anubis13–10-0.0218%28 Sept
inferno13–10.0433%28 Sept
ancient13–00.1742%28 Sept
inferno13–10.1016%28 Sept
ancient11–130.0016%28 Sept
overpass13–3-0.0211%28 Sept
inferno8–130.0035%25 Sept
vertigo11–130.0139%24 Sept
vertigo13–10-0.0019%24 Sept
inferno13–20.0514%24 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0214%21 Sept
overpass13–30.0714%20 Sept
inferno13–100.0113%20 Sept
inferno13–100.0228%15 Sept
overpass13–40.0712%15 Sept
ancient8–130.0611%15 Sept
overpass6–13-0.0118%14 Sept
overpass9–13-0.0636%12 Sept
overpass16–12-0.0322%12 Sept
overpass13–30.1322%12 Sept
vertigo9–130.0222%11 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0113%11 Sept
ancient13–40.0336%11 Sept
ancient13–40.0720%10 Sept
inferno10–130.0715%10 Sept
vertigo9–130.0826%8 Sept
inferno16–13-0.0016%8 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →