biko<

biko< — CS2 Stats

DE76561198120226351[U:1:159960623]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

550Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,813Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 16 May 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,858 -254 16 May8 Jul · 26 days played
13,61415,967peak 15,96716 May8 Jul
16,284Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2025-05-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,764), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate38.2%44.8%45.7%7.5% short
Shot accuracy19.2%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.951.041.050.10 short
Match win rate43.1%45.2%45.7%2.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbiko<FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning50
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42535Last 10042%Win rateWLLLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −4ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time620ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+5.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 10–0 · dust2, 29 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–4 · nuke, 26 Aug
469msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · office, 27 Aug
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 21 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
126In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientD2681831%-0.03
anubisC145936%-0.02
nukeB136746%-0.04
dust2A138562%0.00
cacheC104640%0.01
mirageA85363%0.00
infernoD51420%-0.03
train41325%-0.03
overpass220100%-0.04
palacio2020%-0.07
office1010%-0.07
fachwerk110100%-0.04
golden110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

150,000Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
6,221Matches
43.1%Match win rate
38.2%Headshot %
19.2%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 6 players
12,918MVPs
2,813Hours (in match)
5,814Bombs planted
1,573Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4752,142
AWP15,708
Tec-93,990
FAMAS3,844
P2503,366

Lifetime map wins

9,531dust2
6,679inferno
3,327cbble
2,604train
2,429nuke
1,010vertigo
213lake
190office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

631Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Overpass367%0.7715.3
Mirage250%0.468.5
Anubis10%0.478.0
Ancient1100%1.7017.0
Vertigo1100%1.0427.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
611msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
36.4%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
11.35HE damage / grenade
7.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.5121% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–7-0.0518%31 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0540%30 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0215%30 Aug
anubis8–130.0629%29 Aug
ancient13–160.0518%29 Aug
dust210–00.1310%29 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0520%28 Aug
cache13–90.0925%27 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0019%27 Aug
office1–13-0.0719%27 Aug
anubis1–13-0.060%26 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0221%26 Aug
nuke1–4-0.0950%26 Aug
dust27–130.0426%26 Aug
cache13–90.0215%26 Aug
cache2–5-0.000%25 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0724%25 Aug
mirage10–20.1211%25 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0320%25 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0132%24 Aug
cache13–9-0.0123%24 Aug
dust216–14-0.0222%24 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0826%24 Aug
fachwerk13–3-0.048%21 Aug
overpass13–0-0.0329%21 Aug
cache4–13-0.0433%21 Aug
cache12–120.0426%29 Apr
cache9–130.0326%29 Apr
cache3–13-0.0915%29 Apr
cache8–13-0.0126%29 Apr
cache13–80.0328%29 Apr
palacio1–13-0.0721%14 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0524%14 Nov
golden13–11-0.0311%2 Oct
palacio5–13-0.0813%2 Oct
overpass13–9-0.0616%26 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0120%26 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0223%3 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0326%8 Jul
mirage13–20.018%4 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0622%4 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0226%2 Jul
ancient12–160.0124%2 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0122%1 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0719%1 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0214%30 Jun
mirage13–50.0030%30 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0520%18 Jun
dust213–20.0020%18 Jun
anubis7–13-0.093%18 Jun
train8–130.0217%16 Jun
dust213–100.0214%16 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0313%16 Jun
ancient13–50.0215%16 Jun
anubis13–50.0217%13 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0211%9 Jun
anubis4–13-0.076%7 Jun
ancient9–13-0.069%7 Jun
dust27–3-0.0527%7 Jun
train13–50.0020%7 Jun
train6–13-0.0624%6 Jun
anubis13–3-0.0417%6 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0512%6 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0511%2 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0611%2 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0432%1 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0131%1 Jun
dust28–13-0.0722%31 May
ancient13–20.0324%31 May
anubis15–150.0213%29 May
dust211–13-0.0422%29 May
nuke15–15-0.0425%28 May
ancient13–11-0.0210%28 May
ancient15–15-0.0613%27 May
dust213–10.0514%27 May
nuke13–110.0115%27 May
ancient10–13-0.0517%26 May
dust213–11-0.0111%26 May
mirage13–11-0.0223%25 May
dust25–130.0113%23 May
ancient13–70.0122%23 May
ancient2–13-0.0520%22 May
train4–13-0.0733%22 May
ancient10–130.0413%20 May
ancient10–13-0.0013%20 May
anubis13–11-0.0111%20 May
inferno15–15-0.0213%19 May
nuke9–13-0.077%19 May
mirage8–130.0013%18 May
ancient13–10-0.0511%17 May
nuke13–11-0.0413%17 May
ancient13–11-0.0615%17 May
dust211–130.007%17 May
inferno4–13-0.0516%17 May
nuke9–13-0.0322%17 May
anubis10–13-0.0315%17 May
ancient11–13-0.0227%17 May
anubis13–11-0.0219%16 May
anubis13–2-0.0120%16 May
dust213–10-0.0415%16 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →