Dillen — CS2 Stats

SE76561198129781256[U:1:169515528]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

346Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,794Hours in CS54Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating12,331Blue band · top ~42.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#170336 of 257449 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,059 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,276), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	41.5%	43.8%	44.8%	3.3% short
Shot accuracy	14.6%	12.0%	12.4%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.83	1.02	1.03	0.20 short
Match win rate	40.6%	44.7%	45.2%	4.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60

Positioning54

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–51Last 10049%Win rateWLLWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 562ms

Last 10

3–7 · 30% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

7–13 · 35% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.0

Utility5.9

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels1.8

Clutch5.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0

Positioning5.4

Utility5.9

Mechanics5.6

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time542ms−63ms

first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms

Headshot accuracy16.3%−0.5%

first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–6 · vertigo, 27 Sept →

35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 12 Oct →

398msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · anubis, 17 Oct →

13–2Biggest win · anubis, 17 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

3–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 15% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	46	27–19	59%	-0.02
inferno	D	13	2–11	15%	-0.03
vertigo	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.01
dust2	D	9	2–7	22%	-0.02
cache	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.00
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.02
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.04
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.05
ancient	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,137Lifetime kills

0.83K/D

2,824Matches

40.6%Match win rate

41.5%Headshot %

14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players

6,144MVPs

1,026Hours (in match)

2,877Bombs planted

1,472Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,443

M4A4 / M4A1-S8,176

AWP6,229

P2000 / USP-S2,293

Desert Eagle2,169

Glock-181,512

MP9935

Galil AR891

FAMAS882

P90819

Lifetime map wins

3,727inferno

2,650dust2

924nuke

903cbble

626train

499vertigo

437lake

291bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

127Matches

50%Win rate

0.96Avg K/D

76.6ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	30	53%	0.98	15.5
Ancient	24	54%	0.92	15.5
Dust2	12	50%	1.11	16.6
Inferno	10	50%	1.00	14.8
Anubis	10	50%	1.16	15.7
Nuke	7	29%	0.69	11.3
Overpass	4	75%	0.94	16.3
Train	1	0%	0.70	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy

31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.5%Spray accuracy

75.4%Counter-strafing

10.0°Preaim

544msReaction time

44.4%T opening success

32.6%CT opening success

0.73Enemies flashed / flash

4.5%Flash assists

8.52HE damage / grenade

6.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 32.5728% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
overpass	13–8	-0.01	12%	25 Oct →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	17%	25 Oct →
inferno	10–13	0.02	22%	24 Oct →
cache	13–6	0.01	15%	24 Oct →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	12%	24 Oct →
vertigo	11–13	-0.04	11%	24 Oct →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	24%	24 Oct →
ancient	19–22	-0.02	13%	24 Oct →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	13%	23 Oct →
mirage	20–22	-0.06	13%	22 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	10%	22 Oct →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	12%	22 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	12%	22 Oct →
dust2	19–17	-0.05	15%	21 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	10%	21 Oct →
dust2	15–19	-0.05	13%	21 Oct →
anubis	13–9	-0.11	15%	21 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	23%	20 Oct →
vertigo	5–13	-0.07	17%	19 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	6%	19 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	22%	19 Oct →
mirage	31–34	-0.06	16%	18 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	17%	18 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	20%	18 Oct →
vertigo	13–7	0.02	27%	18 Oct →
mirage	13–7	0.04	19%	18 Oct →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	19%	18 Oct →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	16%	18 Oct →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	31%	17 Oct →
anubis	13–7	0.02	12%	17 Oct →
anubis	13–2	0.04	12%	17 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.07	11%	17 Oct →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	30%	16 Oct →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	13%	15 Oct →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	15%	15 Oct →
vertigo	13–5	0.02	26%	15 Oct →
mirage	9–13	0.00	13%	15 Oct →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	11%	15 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	19%	15 Oct →
vertigo	6–13	-0.06	23%	15 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.08	27%	13 Oct →
dust2	15–19	-0.08	9%	13 Oct →
mirage	16–13	0.03	14%	12 Oct →
mirage	17–19	-0.02	20%	12 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	35%	12 Oct →
inferno	6–13	-0.08	18%	12 Oct →
vertigo	8–13	-0.02	22%	11 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.02	21%	11 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.00	31%	11 Oct →
inferno	14–16	-0.03	17%	11 Oct →
mirage	19–16	-0.03	16%	11 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	16%	10 Oct →
mirage	13–10	0.02	21%	10 Oct →
cache	19–15	-0.00	24%	10 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.02	24%	9 Oct →
vertigo	13–3	0.01	22%	9 Oct →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	22%	9 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	15%	9 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.01	22%	9 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.09	9%	9 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.06	18%	8 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	12%	8 Oct →
vertigo	16–12	0.01	18%	8 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	29%	8 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	32%	7 Oct →
dust2	6–13	0.01	18%	7 Oct →
inferno	2–13	-0.10	13%	7 Oct →
overpass	13–9	-0.10	7%	7 Oct →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	21%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–10	0.04	17%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	11%	5 Oct →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	15%	5 Oct →
cache	13–11	0.02	23%	5 Oct →
vertigo	13–6	0.07	18%	4 Oct →
cache	13–16	0.02	33%	4 Oct →
mirage	9–1	0.07	26%	4 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.00	17%	1 Oct →
inferno	5–13	0.05	15%	1 Oct →
cache	13–10	0.04	27%	1 Oct →
nuke	13–5	-0.02	15%	1 Oct →
vertigo	10–13	-0.06	13%	1 Oct →
vertigo	11–13	-0.02	20%	30 Sept →
anubis	6–13	0.03	16%	30 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	20%	30 Sept →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	9%	29 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.04	26%	29 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	14%	28 Sept →
inferno	10–13	0.02	13%	28 Sept →
mirage	16–13	-0.04	9%	27 Sept →
vertigo	13–6	0.09	15%	27 Sept →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	16%	26 Sept →
cache	13–7	-0.02	20%	26 Sept →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	23%	25 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	19%	25 Sept →
nuke	2–11	-0.09	5%	25 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.02	18%	25 Sept →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	19%	23 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.03	13%	23 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.10	8%	23 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	16%	23 Sept →