Squanchy

Squanchy — CS2 Stats

US76561198129234243[U:1:168968515]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

686Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
821Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating13,242Blue band · top ~37.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21547 of 32106 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate37.1%42.1%42.5%5.3% short
Shot accuracy0.1%12.1%10.9%10.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.700.990.990.30 short
Match win rate38.4%43.9%44.2%5.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 4 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSquanchyFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,242 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim40
Positioning40
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41536Last 10041%Win rateWLWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.0
Aggression3.4
Utility5.7
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.0
Positioning4.0
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time617ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy6.5%−3.9%
first ⅓ avg 10.4% → last ⅓ avg 6.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–3
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
414In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 7infernoWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B38172145%-0.02
nukeC1771041%-0.03
anubisC94544%-0.04
mirageC83538%-0.04
cacheA74357%-0.03
vertigoB63350%-0.04
overpassD62433%0.01
infernoD5050%-0.06
ancient3030%-0.03
train110100%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

9,602Lifetime kills
0.70K/D
898Matches
38.4%Match win rate
37.1%Headshot %
0.1%Shot accuracy
886MVPs
335Hours (in match)
987Bombs planted
148Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,674dust2
1,442nuke
382inferno
273vertigo
265train
179office
8italy
2ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

23Matches
35%Win rate
0.50Avg K/D
43.9ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2650%0.425.8
Nuke633%0.7110.7
Train450%0.498.3
Mirage40%0.427.5
Inferno250%0.495.5
Anubis10%0.152.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

5.9%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
12.8°Preaim
624msReaction time
20.0%T opening success
35.2%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
9.81HE damage / grenade
10.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.7709° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 5.8663% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–110.021%27 Aug
mirage5–13-0.026%27 Aug
cache13–2-0.012%14 Aug
train13–6-0.092%12 Aug
dust21–5-0.0717%11 Aug
inferno7–13-0.078%11 Aug
dust211–13-0.032%10 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0410%10 Aug
vertigo13–40.014%10 Aug
mirage13–70.046%9 Aug
dust213–10-0.019%9 Aug
ancient10–130.062%6 Aug
mirage3–9-0.0211%6 Aug
dust213–9-0.096%4 Aug
inferno5–13-0.096%4 Aug
cache13–10-0.032%4 Aug
dust213–30.148%4 Aug
inferno8–13-0.055%3 Aug
dust25–13-0.057%3 Aug
dust213–16-0.054%3 Aug
dust213–70.0311%2 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.054%1 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.037%1 Aug
anubis16–13-0.087%31 Jul
dust213–10-0.059%31 Jul
nuke7–13-0.102%31 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0212%30 Jul
dust26–13-0.056%30 Jul
inferno11–13-0.036%29 Jul
dust216–120.003%29 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0210%27 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0810%26 Jul
dust211–13-0.068%24 Jul
cache13–6-0.018%24 Jul
anubis10–10.1113%24 Jul
nuke10–13-0.018%24 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0616%22 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0512%22 Jul
nuke11–13-0.059%18 Jul
cache6–13-0.079%18 Jul
dust211–13-0.0612%12 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0914%11 Jul
nuke13–2-0.077%9 Jul
dust211–13-0.0112%4 Jul
overpass5–13-0.029%4 Jul
dust213–9-0.0012%3 Jul
mirage11–13-0.074%3 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0911%3 Jul
dust211–13-0.019%2 Jul
cache13–50.0213%2 Jul
cache12–12-0.042%2 Jul
dust215–15-0.049%2 Jul
overpass3–130.025%2 Jul
overpass5–13-0.074%27 Jun
dust25–13-0.096%27 Jun
overpass8–13-0.026%27 Jun
nuke6–130.0011%27 Jun
dust210–40.0823%26 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0311%26 Jun
dust213–70.0921%26 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0011%26 Jun
nuke13–60.1015%26 Jun
dust213–10.0910%26 Jun
dust213–100.0313%25 Jun
nuke13–80.017%25 Jun
dust21–13-0.1014%24 Jun
cache3–13-0.039%24 Jun
mirage11–13-0.033%24 Jun
dust24–13-0.0917%14 Jun
nuke13–80.010%13 Jun
dust212–12-0.0412%13 Jun
anubis9–130.0110%13 Jun
dust214–16-0.0212%12 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0715%12 Jun
dust213–7-0.0722%11 Jun
dust213–10-0.0211%11 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0511%10 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0717%10 Jun
vertigo8–13-0.110%10 Jun
nuke16–14-0.055%8 Jun
dust213–7-0.0217%6 Jun
nuke6–13-0.108%6 Jun
vertigo11–7-0.087%6 Jun
ancient10–13-0.063%5 Jun
dust210–13-0.102%4 Jun
vertigo13–30.0418%3 Jun
anubis2–13-0.119%2 Jun
dust213–60.025%2 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0512%29 May
dust25–13-0.119%29 May
dust211–13-0.080%28 May
mirage13–5-0.067%28 May
mirage8–6-0.066%28 May
dust28–13-0.066%27 May
dust213–6-0.045%25 May
dust213–90.1212%25 May
dust211–130.1022%25 May
dust214–160.0123%24 May
overpass13–70.0621%24 May
overpass13–50.1117%24 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →