SumDude — CS2 Stats

76561198128702181[U:1:168436453]

192Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
491Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.6 Learning
Premier CS Rating11,299Blue band · top ~48% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4797 of 6683 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSumDudeFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER11,299 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim9
Positioning27
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateLLWWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim0.9
Aggression0.0
Utility5.4
Positioning2.7
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 61% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 739ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim0.9
Positioning2.7
Utility5.4
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 2.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.07−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.06 → last ⅓ avg -0.07
Reaction time749ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 719ms → last ⅓ avg 749ms
Headshot accuracy8.3%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 12.1% → last ⅓ avg 8.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.02Best rating — inferno 13–1
163Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
22Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 78% over 9anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2171433%-0.07
dust2B1910953%-0.06
infernoC167944%-0.06
nukeB126650%-0.06
cacheA106460%-0.06
overpassS97278%-0.07
anubisD82625%-0.05
ancient43175%-0.03
train1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

11,674Lifetime kills
0.75K/D
989Matches
33.9%Match win rate
30.3%Headshot %
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
827MVPs
296Hours (in match)
856Bombs planted
140Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,405dust2
864inferno
513nuke
120train
89vertigo
36cbble
29office
19lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.1%Headshot accuracy
23.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
24.3%Spray accuracy
66.2%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
739msReaction time
13.8%T opening success
15.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
6.67HE damage / grenade
9.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.0609% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 738.5675ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 13.8264% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0815%15 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0715%15 Aug
inferno13–2-0.050%1 Aug
cache13–7-0.009%31 Jul
dust28–13-0.0712%31 Jul
mirage13–3-0.053%31 Jul
nuke13–9-0.073%25 Jul
dust211–13-0.109%25 Jul
cache10–13-0.096%25 Jul
mirage14–16-0.1210%25 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0612%25 Jul
dust213–4-0.070%25 Jul
dust213–4-0.069%25 Jul
cache13–1-0.040%25 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0920%19 Jul
inferno13–6-0.097%19 Jul
mirage8–13-0.107%19 Jul
dust213–9-0.0514%19 Jul
ancient13–8-0.076%19 Jul
inferno13–10.0213%19 Jul
cache13–7-0.048%19 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0516%18 Jul
inferno8–13-0.090%18 Jul
cache13–8-0.098%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.084%18 Jul
dust27–13-0.1015%18 Jul
inferno11–13-0.096%12 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0719%12 Jul
mirage8–13-0.106%12 Jul
dust213–1-0.009%12 Jul
cache12–12-0.116%12 Jul
dust212–1-0.066%12 Jul
dust25–13-0.085%30 May
anubis8–13-0.0516%30 May
nuke3–13-0.100%30 May
cache10–13-0.0713%17 May
mirage5–13-0.1019%17 May
inferno7–13-0.0615%17 May
cache13–1-0.0111%9 May
mirage6–13-0.0518%9 May
anubis13–8-0.085%10 Apr
dust23–13-0.140%10 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0611%28 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0910%28 Mar
nuke13–4-0.0519%28 Mar
dust213–10-0.0512%28 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0621%28 Mar
nuke2–8-0.050%7 Mar
inferno4–13-0.064%7 Mar
dust29–13-0.103%7 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0819%7 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0610%28 Feb
mirage11–13-0.096%28 Feb
ancient13–6-0.005%22 Feb
anubis13–3-0.024%22 Feb
ancient13–80.0115%14 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0714%14 Feb
dust29–13-0.023%14 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0115%14 Feb
dust28–13-0.0324%1 Feb
inferno16–14-0.0215%1 Feb
mirage10–13-0.059%1 Feb
nuke13–11-0.093%1 Feb
anubis15–15-0.058%31 Jan
mirage13–7-0.046%31 Jan
anubis7–13-0.080%31 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0522%14 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0610%14 Dec
train10–13-0.066%7 Dec
mirage13–4-0.0630%7 Dec
overpass13–5-0.0418%7 Dec
inferno6–13-0.0922%7 Dec
nuke13–9-0.0218%7 Dec
mirage13–10-0.042%6 Dec
overpass7–13-0.130%6 Dec
inferno13–8-0.0612%6 Dec
mirage13–4-0.0421%6 Dec
nuke13–7-0.085%6 Dec
overpass13–11-0.0513%6 Dec
ancient4–13-0.086%6 Dec
dust213–10-0.0732%15 Nov
dust213–70.0112%18 May
nuke8–13-0.028%18 May
overpass16–14-0.029%6 Sept
nuke9–16-0.037%6 Sept
nuke11–16-0.0610%4 Sept
mirage8–16-0.0711%9 Jun
nuke1–16-0.1113%9 Jun
overpass3–16-0.088%9 Jun
overpass16–9-0.0610%15 Jan
inferno16–13-0.093%14 Jan
cache14–16-0.0710%12 Nov
mirage8–16-0.0417%12 Nov
inferno11–16-0.0822%12 Nov
dust216–6-0.066%12 Nov
mirage4–9-0.1115%12 Nov
overpass16–9-0.0519%12 Nov
cache16–11-0.057%12 Nov
dust216–3-0.0711%12 Nov
inferno10–16-0.108%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →