Tam Labah

Tam Labah — CS2 Stats

MX76561198127956017[U:1:167690289]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,655Tracked matches69%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating16,430Purple band · top ~22.7% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 19 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,430 +9,820 20 Jun17 Sept · 25 days played
6,61016,430peak 16,43020 Jun17 Sept
16,430Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-06-19

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 16,430
  • +1,317 over 30 days · improving
  • +9,820 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,570 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTam LabahPREMIER16,430 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning36
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50446Last 10050%Win rateWTWLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −7.3pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility4.5
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning3.6
Utility4.5
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time545ms−154ms
first ⅓ avg 700ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy12.5%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 12.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 11–13 · inferno, 15 Jul
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · ancient, 19 Jul
297msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 17 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 19 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB24121250%-0.02
dust2B21111052%-0.01
ancientB21111052%-0.02
anubisA127558%-0.03
cacheD72529%-0.02
mirageB63350%-0.05
nukeD61517%-0.01
office110100%-0.07
train110100%0.03
overpass110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

29Matches
38%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
67.2ADR
25%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2714%0.6411.6
Mirage540%0.6410.6
Inferno560%0.9317.0
Overpass333%0.518.3
Cache367%0.9816.7
Nuke2100%0.9014.5
Ancient20%0.8818.0
Train10%1.2520.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.8%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
70.5%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
531msReaction time
24.7%T opening success
30.5%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
10.21HE damage / grenade
8.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.7924% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.6501% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.034%10 Sept
dust212–120.0417%10 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0821%9 Sept
inferno0–13-0.090%9 Sept
office13–7-0.070%7 Sept
ancient13–3-0.0214%7 Sept
inferno13–7-0.036%7 Sept
inferno2–13-0.110%7 Sept
cache13–3-0.0125%29 Aug
cache9–130.072%28 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0511%28 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0417%21 Aug
dust213–10-0.0114%21 Aug
dust213–70.0538%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.017%21 Aug
dust213–70.0510%18 Aug
anubis13–30.0116%18 Aug
mirage7–2-0.0311%17 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0410%17 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0727%17 Aug
inferno16–130.0211%17 Aug
dust26–13-0.0016%17 Aug
inferno13–110.0813%17 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0111%17 Aug
ancient13–70.0318%17 Aug
ancient1–130.0220%17 Aug
inferno16–14-0.066%12 Aug
cache13–9-0.088%12 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0613%10 Aug
dust213–80.0323%10 Aug
inferno11–13-0.045%9 Aug
ancient13–60.0311%9 Aug
ancient13–7-0.006%8 Aug
mirage13–6-0.046%7 Aug
train13–90.0310%7 Aug
ancient7–13-0.047%5 Aug
ancient13–7-0.032%5 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0814%5 Aug
dust29–13-0.0310%4 Aug
ancient10–13-0.083%4 Aug
inferno13–10-0.016%3 Aug
ancient11–13-0.056%3 Aug
anubis13–9-0.065%2 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0620%2 Aug
cache6–13-0.023%2 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0010%1 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0117%1 Aug
cache3–13-0.0314%1 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0110%30 Jul
dust213–7-0.058%30 Jul
dust215–150.016%28 Jul
nuke10–13-0.018%28 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0418%28 Jul
ancient5–13-0.055%26 Jul
inferno8–13-0.015%26 Jul
inferno13–110.0215%26 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0615%25 Jul
inferno11–13-0.047%25 Jul
inferno3–9-0.260%25 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0229%24 Jul
inferno10–13-0.060%23 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0810%21 Jul
dust29–13-0.0712%20 Jul
mirage5–13-0.087%20 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0110%20 Jul
anubis15–15-0.019%19 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0511%19 Jul
dust26–13-0.0715%19 Jul
ancient13–00.0050%19 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0311%19 Jul
dust215–15-0.086%19 Jul
ancient9–1-0.0111%19 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0612%15 Jul
cache2–13-0.0211%15 Jul
inferno4–130.0014%15 Jul
inferno13–20.1015%15 Jul
inferno11–130.159%15 Jul
inferno6–90.1014%15 Jul
nuke4–90.0836%15 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0110%12 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0111%9 Jul
ancient13–100.0015%9 Jul
overpass13–5-0.040%8 Jul
dust24–13-0.052%8 Jul
mirage13–11-0.037%6 Jul
dust212–120.068%2 Jul
ancient9–130.0516%2 Jul
dust213–70.018%2 Jul
ancient10–13-0.037%30 Jun
inferno13–10-0.015%29 Jun
nuke9–130.0317%28 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0519%28 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0815%26 Jun
dust213–5-0.024%26 Jun
inferno13–100.0313%24 Jun
dust216–13-0.0115%24 Jun
dust213–2-0.0436%24 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0512%20 Jun
dust213–70.0410%20 Jun
cache1–13-0.067%19 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →