Zabarac

Zabarac — CS2 Stats

76561198125479576[U:1:165213848]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

361Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,636Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.3 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating10,517Blue band · top ~52.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Apr 2026 (159 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 6 Apr 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,517 +13 6 Apr17 Apr · 8 days played
6,88510,517peak 10,5176 Apr17 Apr
10,633Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2024-04-06

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 10,517
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,483 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,156), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate38.4%40.9%41.3%3.0% short
Shot accuracy21.4%14.2%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.960.950.95meets
Match win rate38.4%42.1%42.5%4.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZabaracFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER10,517 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim33
Positioning42
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD35605Last 10035%Win rateLWWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 679ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim3.3
Utility4.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 673ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.3
Positioning4.2
Utility4.4
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact1.4

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time662ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 722ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 11 Oct
27%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · overpass, 9 Feb
469msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 14 Oct
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 17 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2381535%-0.02
mirageD2371630%-0.02
ancientD134931%-0.02
anubisD102820%-0.02
overpassS86275%-0.02
dust2C83538%0.01
trainA53260%-0.00
nuke3030%-0.04
office32167%-0.03
vertigo2020%-0.10
palacio1010%-0.05
thera1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,196Lifetime kills
0.96K/D · Top 50% of Level 1 players
4,107Matches
38.4%Match win rate
38.4%Headshot %
21.4%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 1 players
7,410MVPs
1,636Hours (in match)
3,707Bombs planted
779Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,705inferno
1,980train
1,692dust2
1,173nuke
995cbble
860vertigo
219office
154lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
71.7%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
673msReaction time
22.9%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
11.83HE damage / grenade
3.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2701% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.2978 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.8532% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.0617%17 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0117%17 Apr
overpass13–6-0.0217%17 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0414%17 Apr
mirage6–130.0315%17 Apr
mirage8–13-0.016%17 Apr
anubis7–13-0.028%17 Apr
overpass13–20.0512%4 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0422%4 Apr
mirage8–13-0.043%4 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0323%4 Apr
overpass13–6-0.1110%4 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0710%23 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0512%23 Feb
anubis13–60.0211%19 Feb
mirage15–15-0.068%19 Feb
inferno13–6-0.0114%15 Feb
inferno16–13-0.0211%15 Feb
overpass13–11-0.0527%9 Feb
ancient13–8-0.037%9 Feb
mirage13–8-0.035%9 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0318%23 Jan
dust215–150.0114%23 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0313%21 Jan
anubis5–13-0.0423%21 Jan
anubis9–13-0.058%27 Oct
overpass7–13-0.0213%27 Oct
ancient6–13-0.019%27 Oct
nuke4–13-0.099%19 Oct
inferno13–100.0421%15 Oct
inferno13–4-0.0413%14 Oct
inferno11–13-0.029%11 Oct
mirage2–13-0.0814%11 Oct
mirage13–100.1813%11 Oct
mirage15–150.0417%10 Oct
dust213–7-0.0214%10 Oct
overpass8–13-0.0617%9 Oct
nuke6–13-0.0124%9 Oct
palacio7–13-0.0510%7 Oct
inferno3–13-0.0218%25 Sept
train13–60.0519%18 Sept
ancient13–10.0213%17 Sept
ancient13–40.028%17 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0221%9 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0212%9 Sept
ancient12–12-0.0517%9 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0513%9 Sept
inferno9–130.0222%9 Sept
overpass13–40.0221%9 Sept
train14–160.0414%2 Sept
inferno12–16-0.056%21 Jul
ancient9–13-0.074%30 May
inferno11–13-0.059%30 May
inferno7–13-0.098%30 May
inferno7–130.019%19 May
dust28–13-0.047%19 May
mirage12–120.0413%19 May
mirage16–140.027%8 May
ancient14–16-0.0015%15 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0410%27 Feb
inferno13–10-0.063%27 Feb
train13–7-0.0212%9 Feb
anubis8–13-0.038%14 Dec
mirage6–13-0.096%14 Dec
ancient6–13-0.059%14 Dec
mirage13–110.0519%14 Dec
train6–13-0.053%16 Nov
train13–10-0.0419%16 Nov
dust213–100.0211%29 Oct
mirage6–13-0.0411%22 Oct
inferno3–13-0.073%4 Aug
thera10–13-0.0621%4 Aug
mirage13–9-0.116%4 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0313%25 Jul
vertigo11–13-0.087%25 Jul
dust210–130.1117%25 Jul
mirage14–160.029%25 Jul
office13–9-0.0513%16 Jul
inferno13–50.0512%9 Jul
dust213–160.0015%9 Jul
inferno13–20.0514%9 Jul
ancient5–130.078%24 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0812%24 Jun
vertigo8–13-0.112%1 Jun
office13–8-0.029%1 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0519%1 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0710%1 Jun
ancient13–100.025%1 Jun
dust213–40.0319%1 Jun
dust24–13-0.0322%26 May
anubis13–80.0916%26 May
ancient6–13-0.0715%27 Apr
office5–13-0.030%27 Apr
overpass13–30.0110%27 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0513%21 Apr
anubis3–13-0.076%21 Apr
inferno7–130.0421%21 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0614%6 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0223%6 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0411%6 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →