-hurB- — CS2 Stats

76561198123893455[U:1:163627727]

4,118Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#10746 of 11972 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,218 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,218Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,218
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 282 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-hurB-FACEITLevel 10 · 2,218 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,218csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning52
Utility11

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4852Last 10048%Win rateWWWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression5.2
Utility1.1
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.2
Utility1.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time594ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–6
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
1013In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 44ancientWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA44261859%-0.00
anubisC135838%0.00
dust2C125742%0.00
nukeC94544%-0.00
cacheB84450%-0.00
ancientD81713%-0.01
inferno31233%-0.03
overpass21150%0.04
vertigo110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,047Matches
52%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
79.0ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage43051%1.0717.1
Dust218343%1.0016.3
Ancient14851%1.0917.2
Nuke11659%1.0817.0
Anubis9447%1.0517.4
Vertigo8665%1.0617.8
Inferno7344%1.0016.7
Cache5756%1.1416.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
594msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
41.1%CT opening success
0.24Enemies flashed / flash
1.6%Flash assists
2.39HE damage / grenade
2.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2385 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0917% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–30.0137%27 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0330%27 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0526%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0123%25 Aug
mirage13–60.0019%23 Aug
dust213–8-0.0235%21 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0329%19 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0524%18 Aug
mirage9–130.0120%17 Aug
mirage13–50.0715%17 Aug
dust213–70.0133%16 Aug
cache13–70.039%16 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0220%15 Aug
cache13–3-0.0324%14 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0421%11 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0418%11 Aug
dust213–20.0622%11 Aug
mirage13–90.0520%11 Aug
nuke5–130.0224%11 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0521%8 Aug
cache13–110.0422%7 Aug
ancient13–80.0221%7 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0026%6 Aug
dust23–13-0.0128%4 Aug
dust216–140.0316%4 Aug
dust28–130.0619%4 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0518%4 Aug
mirage5–130.0439%3 Aug
cache11–13-0.0026%3 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0228%3 Aug
dust214–160.0025%3 Aug
vertigo13–80.0520%2 Aug
mirage13–110.0827%31 Jul
mirage13–70.0021%31 Jul
dust26–13-0.0519%29 Jul
anubis11–130.0330%28 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0323%28 Jul
ancient8–130.0226%28 Jul
mirage16–12-0.037%27 Jul
mirage7–130.0628%25 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0716%21 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0323%21 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0925%21 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0030%21 Jul
mirage11–130.0028%20 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0618%19 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0117%19 Jul
mirage17–190.0116%15 Jul
dust26–13-0.0435%15 Jul
mirage13–100.0422%15 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0014%14 Jul
ancient7–130.0325%13 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0817%12 Jul
mirage13–30.0429%10 Jul
dust213–20.0918%10 Jul
cache10–13-0.0222%10 Jul
dust21–13-0.099%9 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0415%9 Jul
mirage13–80.0520%9 Jul
anubis8–130.0117%9 Jul
cache14–16-0.0216%6 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0235%4 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0324%2 Jul
cache9–13-0.0311%30 Jun
nuke19–15-0.0213%30 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0424%30 Jun
dust24–13-0.0333%24 Jun
anubis13–90.0633%24 Jun
mirage13–60.1024%24 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0032%24 Jun
mirage13–80.0327%24 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0321%23 Jun
nuke13–60.0322%23 Jun
cache13–90.0033%23 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0020%22 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0524%22 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0544%21 Jun
anubis8–130.0220%21 Jun
anubis13–110.0523%21 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0126%19 Jun
ancient16–19-0.0514%18 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0124%14 Jun
mirage13–40.0126%13 Jun
mirage16–140.0017%11 Jun
overpass11–130.0221%11 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0133%11 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0231%10 Jun
mirage16–140.0137%10 Jun
nuke9–130.0226%9 Jun
anubis22–18-0.0224%9 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0718%9 Jun
mirage13–100.0221%9 Jun
overpass13–40.0526%9 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0311%9 Jun
mirage13–40.0121%8 Jun
ancient11–130.0027%8 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0235%8 Jun
nuke13–60.0426%6 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0111%5 Jun
mirage13–20.0630%5 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →