heduammuskelija64

heduammuskelija64 — CS2 Stats

76561198122675179[U:1:162409451]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,331Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,005Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating22,045Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#50614 of 232041 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,777 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,331 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 26 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,045 -3,074 1 Jul19 Sept · 14 days played
22,04525,119peak 25,1191 Jul19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,777 +0 2 Sept19 Sept · 3 observations
1,7771,777peak 1,7772 Sept19 Sept
25,119Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,777Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-06-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,777
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 224 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,074 below peak (25,119)
  • -3,074 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,955 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate47.8%46.8%48.3%meets
Shot accuracy5.9%13.0%13.2%7.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.061.070.09 short
Match win rate51.9%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGheduammuskelija64FACEITLevel 8 · 1,777 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,045 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,777csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning44
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateLWWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 668ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility6.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning4.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time662ms+46ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 5–0 · ancient, 29 Jul
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · office, 9 Jul
359msFastest reaction time · 9–3 · inferno, 10 Jul
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 27 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 60% over 10nukeWeakest map · 47% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21111052%-0.00
dust2B158753%-0.01
nukeB157847%-0.01
anubisB158753%0.00
cacheB126650%-0.03
officeA106460%0.01
ancientB84450%0.00
inferno41325%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,808Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
2,467Matches
51.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
47.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
5.9%Shot accuracy
6,347MVPs
1,005Hours (in match)
2,284Bombs planted
566Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,816nuke
2,810vertigo
2,310dust2
1,114inferno
664office
648train
84assault
48militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

496Matches
54%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
83.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15153%1.0616.4
Anubis7367%1.1217.4
Nuke7059%1.0115.9
Ancient5954%1.1115.4
Dust25645%0.9514.2
Vertigo4360%1.2518.8
Inferno1533%0.7411.7
Train956%1.1116.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
75.1%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
659msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
35.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
7.63HE damage / grenade
12.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5192% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0323%6 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0636%6 Sept
dust213–8-0.0026%6 Sept
mirage2–130.0521%9 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0219%30 Jul
anubis7–130.0130%29 Jul
ancient5–00.2522%29 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0227%29 Jul
dust213–70.0313%29 Jul
dust29–13-0.0319%29 Jul
dust210–130.0315%28 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0226%28 Jul
dust213–0-0.0214%27 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0417%27 Jul
inferno8–130.008%26 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0225%23 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0214%20 Jul
cache5–13-0.0720%20 Jul
nuke12–160.0218%19 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0428%19 Jul
mirage13–60.0315%19 Jul
cache10–13-0.0619%19 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0021%19 Jul
anubis13–70.0312%19 Jul
anubis13–100.0220%18 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0126%18 Jul
nuke13–90.0117%18 Jul
dust26–130.0431%17 Jul
cache2–13-0.0913%17 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0719%17 Jul
cache10–130.0019%17 Jul
mirage19–17-0.0117%16 Jul
cache13–4-0.0315%16 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0127%16 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0122%16 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0021%16 Jul
nuke10–130.0625%14 Jul
nuke2–6-0.0420%14 Jul
cache13–11-0.0422%14 Jul
dust21–11-0.0320%13 Jul
anubis13–100.0117%13 Jul
mirage13–60.0512%13 Jul
dust213–100.0227%13 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0130%13 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0414%13 Jul
anubis10–13-0.047%13 Jul
cache13–80.0515%12 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0514%12 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0912%12 Jul
cache13–9-0.0224%12 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0433%12 Jul
anubis10–130.0631%11 Jul
cache13–70.0110%10 Jul
nuke13–90.0216%10 Jul
cache13–110.0128%10 Jul
office6–13-0.1021%10 Jul
office13–80.0018%10 Jul
office13–80.0429%10 Jul
inferno9–3-0.0425%10 Jul
office13–80.0520%10 Jul
office13–40.0139%9 Jul
office13–40.0142%9 Jul
office13–1-0.0110%9 Jul
office8–130.0331%9 Jul
office12–120.0122%9 Jul
office10–130.0527%9 Jul
mirage14–160.0226%9 Jul
mirage3–130.0213%9 Jul
dust213–60.0117%9 Jul
anubis13–80.0423%8 Jul
mirage13–100.0122%8 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0216%5 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0610%5 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0116%3 Jul
mirage11–130.0122%2 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0511%1 Jul
mirage13–60.0416%1 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0215%1 Jul
dust28–13-0.0114%1 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0021%1 Jul
cache11–13-0.0728%1 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0326%30 Jun
dust28–13-0.0816%30 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0722%30 Jun
dust213–100.0124%29 Jun
dust213–6-0.0240%29 Jun
nuke13–50.0619%29 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0111%28 Jun
anubis22–200.0020%28 Jun
nuke13–90.0210%28 Jun
mirage13–100.0117%28 Jun
cache9–13-0.0125%27 Jun
anubis13–100.0229%27 Jun
nuke26–280.0120%27 Jun
dust213–70.0117%27 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0112%27 Jun
ancient13–2-0.0013%27 Jun
dust27–13-0.0712%26 Jun
ancient9–13-0.056%26 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0422%26 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →