Nolly

Nolly — CS2 Stats

SE76561198121434661[U:1:161168933]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,015Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
9,587Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,575Top 25% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#35559 of 251512 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,575 +2,933 4 Aug – 12 Oct · 27 days played
20,30824,904peak 24,9044 Aug12 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,990 +0 1 Sept – 14 Sept · 2 observations
1,9901,990peak 1,9901 Sept14 Sept
24,904Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,990Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,329 below peak (24,904)
  • +808 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,425 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches18——
Win rate50%——
K/D0.81——
Headshot %59%——

Measured 14 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,591), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate52.2%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy15.6%13.3%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.771.071.090.31 short
Match win rate46.6%46.9%48.4%1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNollyFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,575 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,990csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning54
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateLWLWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.4
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time540ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 14 Aug →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 5–9 · inferno, 13 Aug →
328msFastest reaction time · 7–1 · ancient, 13 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 14 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12nukeWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2112–957%0.02
nukeC187–1139%0.01
infernoA149–564%0.01
ancientB136–746%-0.01
dust2A138–562%0.01
anubisS128–467%0.03
cacheC94–544%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

278,783Lifetime kills
0.77K/D
9,953Matches
46.6%Match win rate
52.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
15.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
25,685MVPs
8,560Hours (in match)
15,408Bombs planted
3,598Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47124,665
AWP24,184
P2506,011
Knife5,868
FAMAS4,862

Lifetime map wins

22,672inferno
12,507dust2
8,112nuke
5,838train
5,283vertigo
1,724cbble
24lake
19dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,035Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
80.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis7155%1.1816.6
Ancient6444%1.0015.8
Mirage5648%1.0515.8
Inferno5252%1.1316.1
Nuke4443%1.3118.0
Dust22540%1.0615.2
Overpass2454%1.0816.3
Vertigo1953%0.9716.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
547msReaction time
33.2%T opening success
49.3%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
9.74HE damage / grenade
6.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.153% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0218%12 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0134%12 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0119%11 Oct →
ancient13–60.0218%11 Oct →
mirage16–130.0434%10 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0314%10 Oct →
anubis16–130.1330%10 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0419%10 Oct →
ancient13–50.0520%10 Oct →
dust213–100.0527%10 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0130%20 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.039%20 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0811%20 Sept →
anubis13–110.0210%20 Sept →
inferno13–40.0413%20 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0119%20 Sept →
inferno13–70.0522%9 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0420%9 Sept →
mirage13–30.0531%9 Sept →
nuke15–150.1020%8 Sept →
anubis13–50.1030%5 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0731%5 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0821%1 Sept →
mirage14–160.0320%31 Aug →
inferno13–20.0740%31 Aug →
mirage11–130.0217%31 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0313%31 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0816%31 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0315%31 Aug →
mirage13–90.0125%31 Aug →
mirage4–130.0121%31 Aug →
dust216–13-0.048%31 Aug →
cache8–130.0027%30 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0324%25 Aug →
cache13–110.0115%25 Aug →
ancient13–70.0221%25 Aug →
dust211–130.0533%24 Aug →
nuke10–130.079%24 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0220%18 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0313%18 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0312%17 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0217%16 Aug →
inferno13–20.0422%16 Aug →
anubis10–130.027%16 Aug →
nuke13–100.0819%15 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0412%15 Aug →
mirage13–70.0527%15 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0428%15 Aug →
dust214–160.1025%14 Aug →
mirage13–10.1614%14 Aug →
nuke15–150.0320%14 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0115%14 Aug →
inferno0–13-0.0614%14 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0425%14 Aug →
inferno13–30.0931%14 Aug →
cache15–150.0114%14 Aug →
nuke13–40.1326%14 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0329%13 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0315%13 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0515%13 Aug →
mirage16–12-0.0115%13 Aug →
dust213–40.0930%13 Aug →
nuke10–130.0126%13 Aug →
cache15–150.0518%13 Aug →
ancient7–1-0.099%13 Aug →
ancient13–40.0416%13 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0221%13 Aug →
cache16–130.0213%13 Aug →
inferno5–90.0241%13 Aug →
anubis16–140.0114%12 Aug →
inferno13–100.0124%12 Aug →
cache13–80.0614%12 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.1010%12 Aug →
anubis11–130.0212%11 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0821%11 Aug →
ancient9–130.0217%10 Aug →
nuke13–60.0628%10 Aug →
mirage9–130.0716%10 Aug →
anubis13–90.0019%9 Aug →
inferno13–70.0814%9 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0421%9 Aug →
ancient10–130.0421%9 Aug →
anubis13–10.0518%9 Aug →
nuke13–90.0215%9 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0319%9 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.007%8 Aug →
nuke13–100.0319%7 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0422%7 Aug →
anubis13–50.0415%7 Aug →
dust24–130.0830%7 Aug →
cache14–160.0313%7 Aug →
mirage7–130.0425%6 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0033%6 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0419%6 Aug →
mirage13–60.0717%6 Aug →
mirage13–100.0417%5 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0226%5 Aug →
dust213–20.0827%5 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0230%5 Aug →
cache13–40.0834%4 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.