Eida

Eida — CS2 Stats

76561198120825390[U:1:160559662]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,181Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,297Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,018Top 25% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41090 of 247868 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,755 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (28 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,181 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,018 -761 25 Jun – 3 Sept · 18 days played
22,52324,764peak 24,76425 Jun3 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,755Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-06-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,755
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 246 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,746 below peak (24,764)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,982 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 3 Sep 2026 and 1 Oct 2026.

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,327), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.0%48.2%50.9%5.9% short
Shot accuracy20.0%13.3%13.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.101.071.09meets
Match win rate45.0%46.9%48.4%3.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEidaFACEITLevel 9 · 1,755 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,018 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,755csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning36
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateLLWLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +46ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.6
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning3.6
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time537ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy12.3%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 26 Jun →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · inferno, 26 Jun →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–0 · inferno, 26 Jun →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 15 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2714–1352%-0.01
anubisA148–657%0.01
ancientC146–843%-0.02
infernoA138–562%0.02
cacheB115–645%0.02
nukeA106–460%-0.00
dust2S54–180%0.02
overpass—32–167%0.06
vertigo—20–20%-0.07
shelter—10–10%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

143,756Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
7,722Matches
45.0%Match win rate
45.0%Headshot %
20.0%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 9 players
21,656MVPs
3,297Hours (in match)
4,932Bombs planted
1,098Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,090inferno
3,089nuke
2,973dust2
1,987vertigo
1,856train
1,099cbble
78office
67lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

651Matches
54%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
78.9ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5657%1.0014.7
Ancient2857%1.0014.7
Anubis2650%1.0513.4
Inferno1656%1.1017.4
Nuke1479%1.0515.5
Dust2633%0.8616.7
Overpass450%0.8315.5
Cache1100%0.5913.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.6%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
85.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
543msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
37.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
8.44HE damage / grenade
5.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.6493% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.95% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–13-0.075%3 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0910%3 Aug →
inferno13–110.0021%2 Aug →
mirage7–130.0612%2 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0716%2 Aug →
anubis13–160.0110%2 Aug →
cache13–100.0417%2 Aug →
cache11–130.0116%31 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0110%31 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0515%28 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.027%27 Jul →
mirage8–50.0623%27 Jul →
inferno12–12-0.0313%27 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0014%27 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0219%23 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0612%22 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0211%20 Jul →
mirage10–130.0018%20 Jul →
nuke6–1-0.060%20 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.148%20 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.064%19 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.027%19 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.076%18 Jul →
mirage13–60.0621%18 Jul →
mirage13–70.0115%18 Jul →
anubis13–60.0710%17 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0116%17 Jul →
anubis13–60.078%16 Jul →
mirage13–50.0217%16 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0111%15 Jul →
cache13–7-0.049%15 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0910%15 Jul →
mirage13–20.0118%15 Jul →
nuke13–20.0214%15 Jul →
dust211–13-0.047%15 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0211%15 Jul →
ancient13–30.0222%14 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0419%14 Jul →
inferno16–130.0014%14 Jul →
nuke13–80.017%14 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0327%13 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.018%13 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0614%13 Jul →
ancient13–90.0110%13 Jul →
anubis13–30.0613%13 Jul →
mirage12–120.0316%13 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0125%12 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0321%12 Jul →
dust27–0-0.016%12 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.059%12 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.049%11 Jul →
mirage13–20.0413%11 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0310%11 Jul →
cache8–130.076%10 Jul →
dust213–50.0919%10 Jul →
ancient9–130.0615%10 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.019%10 Jul →
inferno13–40.067%9 Jul →
mirage13–90.0119%9 Jul →
mirage13–70.0011%9 Jul →
ancient10–130.0623%9 Jul →
cache13–40.0810%9 Jul →
shelter3–13-0.098%9 Jul →
dust213–70.0510%7 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.057%7 Jul →
cache13–30.0717%7 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0216%6 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0319%6 Jul →
cache9–130.1113%6 Jul →
overpass9–20.167%6 Jul →
vertigo3–9-0.1618%6 Jul →
inferno9–30.0515%6 Jul →
nuke9–20.1616%6 Jul →
nuke8–130.0417%4 Jul →
anubis16–140.0113%4 Jul →
overpass14–16-0.0314%4 Jul →
inferno2–130.010%4 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.024%4 Jul →
anubis11–130.0010%2 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.118%30 Jun →
anubis13–60.019%30 Jun →
overpass13–70.0316%30 Jun →
vertigo4–130.0319%29 Jun →
inferno9–130.0013%29 Jun →
ancient16–12-0.0212%28 Jun →
cache12–120.0017%28 Jun →
anubis4–13-0.0110%27 Jun →
cache13–4-0.0216%27 Jun →
mirage12–120.0311%27 Jun →
mirage2–2-0.0525%27 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0110%26 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0312%26 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0112%26 Jun →
inferno9–00.2529%26 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0618%25 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0517%25 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.0410%25 Jun →
anubis13–90.0410%25 Jun →
inferno13–110.0518%25 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0412%25 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.