dobu — CS2 Stats

PRO“d”ATOX EsportsMongoliaRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198120157641[U:1:159891913]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,718Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2Days observed since 2026-08-31

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning68

Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY63–37Last 10063%Win rateWWLWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression7.9

Utility4.6

Positioning6.8

Opening Duels4.7

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning6.8

Utility4.6

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels4.7

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time567ms+47ms

first ⅓ avg 520ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms

Headshot accuracy29.8%+4.0%

first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 29.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–11

13–0Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

W2Current streak

8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	38	22–16	58%	0.04
nuke	S	20	15–5	75%	0.04
ancient	A	18	11–7	61%	0.02
anubis	C	10	4–6	40%	0.02
dust2	S	6	5–1	83%	0.04
inferno	S	5	4–1	80%	0.05
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,673Matches

64%Win rate

1.39Avg K/D

90.1ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

20Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	225	63%	1.22	17.3
Ancient	171	73%	1.36	17.8
Anubis	110	68%	1.28	18.2
Nuke	107	70%	1.42	17.9
Dust2	57	58%	1.26	16.5
Inferno	57	70%	1.47	17.2
Vertigo	10	50%	1.54	24.8
Overpass	7	71%	1.15	16.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.5%Headshot accuracy

33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.1%Spray accuracy

87.2%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

577msReaction time

38.7%T opening success

59.1%CT opening success

0.75Enemies flashed / flash

8.9%Flash assists

9.46HE damage / grenade

11.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.6542% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–5	0.10	33%	31 May →
mirage	13–0	0.07	30%	8 May →
mirage	3–13	0.05	25%	29 Mar →
overpass	13–10	0.02	33%	14 Mar →
mirage	0–7	-0.03	7%	14 Nov →
ancient	4–13	0.04	26%	8 Nov →
nuke	13–9	0.04	28%	8 Nov →
dust2	13–6	0.00	27%	8 Nov →
mirage	13–9	0.06	24%	2 Nov →
ancient	9–13	0.02	22%	1 Nov →
nuke	13–7	0.10	34%	2 May →
dust2	13–9	0.04	32%	21 Dec →
nuke	13–5	0.05	24%	26 Oct →
anubis	8–13	0.03	35%	24 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.15	45%	22 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.10	43%	22 Oct →
dust2	16–12	0.04	34%	10 Oct →
dust2	8–13	0.02	31%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	34%	7 May →
nuke	13–4	0.05	21%	5 May →
ancient	2–13	-0.00	27%	5 May →
ancient	13–7	0.04	25%	3 May →
nuke	16–12	0.03	33%	3 May →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	16%	28 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.01	27%	27 Apr →
mirage	16–19	0.05	33%	25 Apr →
nuke	13–4	-0.00	27%	24 Apr →
nuke	13–4	0.04	26%	23 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.15	40%	23 Apr →
ancient	13–4	0.05	19%	10 Mar →
mirage	22–18	0.11	53%	9 Mar →
mirage	13–16	0.00	35%	9 Mar →
mirage	22–19	0.01	34%	7 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.02	30%	7 Mar →
anubis	5–13	0.00	24%	7 Mar →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	27%	6 Mar →
mirage	11–8	0.02	32%	6 Mar →
anubis	8–13	0.04	36%	6 Mar →
ancient	10–13	0.02	29%	6 Mar →
mirage	9–13	0.08	31%	6 Mar →
anubis	1–13	-0.06	17%	6 Mar →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	26%	23 Feb →
mirage	13–9	0.08	25%	23 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.04	20%	23 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.02	34%	22 Feb →
ancient	13–1	-0.01	29%	21 Feb →
overpass	11–13	-0.05	30%	21 Feb →
inferno	9–13	0.03	20%	21 Feb →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	41%	21 Feb →
anubis	13–5	0.13	41%	21 Feb →
nuke	11–13	0.04	37%	20 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.01	18%	20 Feb →
inferno	13–9	-0.06	18%	20 Feb →
anubis	13–4	-0.01	22%	20 Feb →
mirage	13–10	0.03	38%	20 Feb →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	15%	20 Feb →
nuke	14–16	0.03	29%	20 Feb →
mirage	13–5	0.06	30%	20 Feb →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	33%	19 Feb →
nuke	13–11	0.00	23%	19 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.03	28%	19 Feb →
nuke	5–13	0.02	45%	19 Feb →
anubis	10–13	0.02	26%	19 Feb →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	23%	19 Feb →
mirage	13–8	0.01	23%	17 Feb →
nuke	19–16	0.07	22%	17 Feb →
ancient	16–13	0.10	22%	16 Feb →
mirage	13–1	0.04	19%	16 Feb →
ancient	13–2	0.07	19%	16 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.02	19%	16 Feb →
mirage	10–13	0.06	38%	16 Feb →
inferno	13–3	0.08	28%	14 Feb →
nuke	13–4	0.07	28%	14 Feb →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	24%	14 Feb →
mirage	11–13	0.05	20%	14 Feb →
nuke	13–8	0.10	28%	14 Feb →
anubis	13–6	0.08	25%	14 Feb →
ancient	11–12	0.00	21%	14 Feb →
mirage	13–5	0.05	32%	13 Feb →
inferno	13–2	0.12	34%	8 Feb →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	26%	8 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.08	31%	8 Feb →
nuke	5–13	0.02	24%	8 Feb →
ancient	13–8	0.04	33%	7 Feb →
mirage	7–13	0.09	28%	7 Feb →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	31%	7 Feb →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	24%	5 Feb →
nuke	13–6	-0.06	30%	3 Feb →
nuke	13–7	0.13	20%	3 Feb →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	24%	2 Feb →
nuke	16–19	-0.01	25%	23 Jan →
mirage	13–16	0.05	26%	23 Jan →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	18%	22 Jan →
ancient	13–3	0.06	29%	22 Jan →
nuke	13–7	0.08	22%	22 Jan →
mirage	13–3	0.03	25%	22 Jan →
mirage	13–8	0.10	29%	21 Jan →
anubis	13–9	0.02	19%	19 Jan →
inferno	13–7	0.08	28%	19 Jan →
vertigo	22–20	0.08	28%	19 Jan →