NapTimeTax

NapTimeTax — CS2 Stats

IT76561198119639917[U:1:159374189]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,857Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (50 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+126Tracked matches · now 4,857
−17.2ppWin rate · 62.1% → 44.8%

Rating over time

19,589Peak Premier in tracked matches
61Days played since 2026-04-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNapTimeTaxFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning58
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateWLLWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +9.3pp headshot accuracy · −88ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 445ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.8
Utility4.0
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time555ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%+4.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–10 · overpass, 13 Apr →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 1 Nov →
352msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · cache, 5 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 13 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
3–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 62% over 13mirageWeakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD196–1332%-0.00
ancientA148–657%0.00
nukeA138–562%0.00
infernoA116–555%0.00
vertigoA95–456%0.02
officeB84–450%-0.03
anubisA74–357%0.06
dust2—32–167%0.04
train—33–0100%0.06
overpass—31–233%0.06
cache—20–20%-0.07
fachwerk—21–150%-0.02
cache_b—21–150%0.03
boulder—11–0100%-0.01
shelter—11–0100%0.13
italy—11–0100%0.14
alpine—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,167Matches
52%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
74.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient94756%1.1315.7
Anubis55949%1.1115.0
Mirage41049%1.1615.9
Nuke36056%1.1615.5
Vertigo28661%1.2116.9
Inferno17754%1.0615.2
Dust29133%0.9013.8
Overpass8149%1.0115.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
546msReaction time
53.5%T opening success
41.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
6.52HE damage / grenade
7.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4758 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.0257%1 Nov →
office8–13-0.0520%1 Nov →
inferno11–13-0.0713%17 Oct →
nuke13–100.0233%13 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0833%5 Oct →
vertigo13–110.1033%29 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0234%29 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0823%26 Sept →
nuke8–130.0124%15 Sept →
dust213–70.0929%13 Sept →
nuke13–30.0920%9 Sept →
office7–13-0.0420%6 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0115%1 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0129%30 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0325%28 Aug →
nuke13–80.0521%26 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0522%25 Aug →
fachwerk2–13-0.0724%22 Aug →
office12–120.0124%22 Aug →
office11–13-0.107%20 Aug →
ancient13–100.0022%16 Aug →
mirage14–160.0435%14 Aug →
ancient13–30.0527%12 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0321%11 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0210%1 Aug →
vertigo7–13-0.0120%30 Jul →
vertigo3–13-0.0520%30 Jul →
train13–90.0431%25 Jul →
inferno9–00.1428%23 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0113%23 Jul →
overpass8–130.038%16 Jul →
office13–9-0.0326%16 Jul →
mirage13–40.0324%15 Jul →
inferno13–70.0221%11 Jul →
office13–7-0.0125%9 Jul →
boulder13–10-0.0122%9 Jul →
fachwerk13–90.0224%9 Jul →
shelter13–80.1315%9 Jul →
italy13–30.1420%8 Jul →
office13–90.0621%8 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0221%1 Jul →
ancient13–90.0620%29 Jun →
anubis13–6-0.0013%26 Jun →
ancient13–90.0323%19 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.078%14 Jun →
ancient13–20.0829%13 Jun →
ancient16–14-0.0113%7 Jun →
mirage13–70.028%30 May →
inferno19–160.0521%29 May →
anubis11–20.0947%27 May →
inferno6–13-0.0312%26 May →
inferno13–100.0229%24 May →
ancient9–13-0.0311%24 May →
nuke8–8-0.1316%23 May →
inferno9–6-0.0332%23 May →
mirage13–100.0226%11 May →
anubis13–30.1129%10 May →
nuke13–50.0321%10 May →
overpass7–13-0.0131%8 May →
nuke2–13-0.0141%4 May →
office13–9-0.0429%3 May →
alpine5–1-0.040%3 May →
cache10–13-0.0525%3 May →
anubis9–130.1221%3 May →
ancient6–13-0.0514%26 Apr →
ancient2–13-0.0725%23 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.0911%22 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0330%21 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0424%19 Apr →
ancient13–70.0611%19 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0325%18 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0616%15 Apr →
vertigo7–13-0.0126%15 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0413%15 Apr →
nuke13–70.0316%14 Apr →
vertigo13–90.0119%14 Apr →
anubis9–130.0620%14 Apr →
cache_b6–130.0118%13 Apr →
train13–80.059%13 Apr →
mirage5–130.009%13 Apr →
overpass13–100.1627%13 Apr →
inferno13–30.0723%13 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0416%12 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0021%12 Apr →
dust213–80.0418%12 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0718%12 Apr →
mirage8–130.0227%11 Apr →
vertigo10–13-0.0213%11 Apr →
vertigo13–90.0514%11 Apr →
vertigo13–70.0511%11 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0121%11 Apr →
cache_b13–70.0650%11 Apr →
mirage13–40.0616%10 Apr →
mirage13–70.1029%10 Apr →
ancient9–130.0116%10 Apr →
mirage6–130.0122%10 Apr →
train13–20.0917%10 Apr →
anubis13–70.0720%10 Apr →
mirage8–130.0115%10 Apr →
mirage23–250.0113%9 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.