[Miku] Gabbah — CS2 Stats

DE76561198119404246[U:1:159138518]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,584Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,472Hours in CS36Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating19,340Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#82328 of 221145 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,340 → 19,340

+2Tracked matches · now 1,584

0.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 56.7%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 11 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,340 +699 31 Aug – 16 Sept · 6 days played

19,340Peak Premier in tracked matches

28Days played since 2026-08-11

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 19,340
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 660 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-09-11
Blue band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

Metric	Last 7	Previous 7	Change
Matches	16	—	—
Win rate	38%	—	—
K/D	0.78	—	—
Headshot %	51%	—	—

Measured 11 Sep 2026 → 17 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	39.4%	45.8%	46.8%	7.4% short
Shot accuracy	15.4%	12.7%	13.0%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.05	1.05	1.06	meets
Match win rate	44.0%	45.7%	46.3%	2.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54

Positioning45

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–38–2Last 10060%Win rateWWWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 678ms

Last 10

5–5 · 50% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 605ms

Last 20

11–9 · 55% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 587ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim5.4

Utility6.1

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels1.6

Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4

Positioning4.5

Utility6.1

Mechanics4.2

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time601ms+12ms

first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms

Headshot accuracy15.2%−0.6%

first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 17 Aug →

34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 2 Sept →

336msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · office, 8 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · nuke, 4 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

10–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 20infernoWeakest map · 50% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
anubis	S	20	16–4	80%	-0.01
dust2	A	17	10–7	59%	-0.02
cache	A	17	10–7	59%	-0.01
nuke	S	15	10–5	67%	-0.02
inferno	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.02
mirage	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.03
office	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
ancient	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.06
poseidon	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.10
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

140,935Lifetime kills

1.05K/D

7,304Matches

44.0%Match win rate

39.4%Headshot %

15.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players

19,455MVPs

2,717Hours (in match)

4,700Bombs planted

1,553Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,074

AWP24,037

M4A4 / M4A1-S20,490

Desert Eagle11,161

P2000 / USP-S8,738

Glock-185,660

Galil AR3,649

P2503,109

SG 5533,049

SSG 082,820

Lifetime map wins

9,844inferno

7,677dust2

2,656nuke

2,101train

2,027vertigo

1,754cbble

826office

447italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

558Matches

53%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

68.7ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	24	71%	0.86	13.0
Nuke	19	53%	0.83	12.8
Cache	16	50%	0.82	13.0
Dust2	15	67%	0.90	13.5
Inferno	15	53%	0.85	13.5
Ancient	12	33%	0.79	11.6
Mirage	5	60%	0.89	13.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy

32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.8%Spray accuracy

68.9%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

590msReaction time

36.1%T opening success

40.0%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

3.8%Flash assists

10.59HE damage / grenade

7.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.9513% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.1064% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–11	0.00	16%	16 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.05	16%	16 Sept →
dust2	9–1	0.07	18%	14 Sept →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	25%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	14%	14 Sept →
cache	13–2	0.06	21%	12 Sept →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	12%	12 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.06	12%	12 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	16%	12 Sept →
anubis	13–4	0.02	13%	12 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	19%	12 Sept →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	11%	12 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.00	14%	11 Sept →
anubis	13–16	-0.05	21%	11 Sept →
cache	10–13	-0.09	16%	9 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	4%	9 Sept →
inferno	13–8	0.00	17%	9 Sept →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	11%	9 Sept →
cache	19–17	-0.03	11%	8 Sept →
inferno	13–6	0.08	26%	8 Sept →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	21%	8 Sept →
office	6–13	-0.08	15%	8 Sept →
anubis	13–10	0.01	16%	7 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.02	18%	7 Sept →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	11%	7 Sept →
nuke	16–14	-0.04	11%	7 Sept →
shelter	13–8	-0.02	6%	6 Sept →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	14%	6 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.01	23%	5 Sept →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	11%	4 Sept →
nuke	13–1	0.01	15%	4 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.05	15%	4 Sept →
train	13–3	0.04	14%	3 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.03	16%	3 Sept →
office	13–8	0.10	29%	3 Sept →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	23%	2 Sept →
cache	13–3	0.01	34%	2 Sept →
poseidon	7–9	-0.13	20%	31 Aug →
poseidon	7–9	-0.06	15%	31 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.00	14%	31 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	18%	31 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	10%	30 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.03	17%	30 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	15%	27 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	17%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	15%	27 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.04	9%	27 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	9%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	8%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–1	-0.02	9%	24 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.03	30%	24 Aug →
inferno	22–19	-0.05	21%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	22%	22 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	20%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.09	14%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.04	28%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	23%	21 Aug →
office	11–13	0.01	14%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.02	14%	21 Aug →
nuke	0–2	-0.09	0%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.06	17%	20 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.01	8%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	21%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.05	21%	20 Aug →
dust2	17–19	-0.04	21%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.03	12%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.02	21%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.00	13%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	17%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.12	27%	17 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.03	20%	17 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	21%	17 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.04	10%	17 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.03	14%	16 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.03	16%	16 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.08	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.04	14%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.05	19%	15 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	14%	15 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	21%	15 Aug →
anubis	16–13	-0.03	15%	15 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.03	18%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	24%	14 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.03	10%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	14%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	13%	13 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	10%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	11%	13 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.12	10%	13 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.01	15%	13 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	3%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	19%	12 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.05	22%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	12%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	27%	12 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.02	18%	11 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.01	8%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.06	8%	11 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.10	23%	11 Aug →