NaZooie — CS2 Stats
76561198119050123[U:1:158784395]✓ No bans
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity
Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.
Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 99 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 32 | 20–12 | 63% | 0.03 | |
| C | 24 | 9–15 | 38% | 0.01 | |
| S | 19 | 13–6 | 68% | 0.04 | |
| C | 10 | 4–6 | 40% | 0.04 | |
| D | 6 | 2–4 | 33% | 0.04 | |
| D | 5 | 1–4 | 20% | 0.02 | |
| — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | 0.02 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.08 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 653 | 53% | 1.27 | 17.8 |
| Anubis | 650 | 53% | 1.33 | 18.3 |
| Mirage | 603 | 49% | 1.29 | 18.3 |
| Dust2 | 450 | 50% | 1.27 | 17.8 |
| Nuke | 438 | 54% | 1.40 | 19.2 |
| Inferno | 345 | 51% | 1.37 | 19.2 |
| Overpass | 145 | 61% | 1.48 | 19.2 |
| Vertigo | 70 | 61% | 1.41 | 19.7 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.3877 — below the 4 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.1022% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–5 | 0.04 | 29% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.05 | 29% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.07 | 17% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.02 | 30% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.10 | 35% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 18% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 40% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 17% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 27% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.07 | 23% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.04 | 32% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 22% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.00 | 47% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.03 | 26% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.04 | 30% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.03 | 20% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.04 | 22% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.02 | 17% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.07 | 24% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 40% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 24% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 27% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.02 | 33% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 29% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.11 | 42% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.01 | 26% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.01 | 18% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 24% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.04 | 28% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.04 | 20% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.13 | 24% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.00 | 22% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 27% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.13 | 26% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 28% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.06 | 25% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.06 | 15% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.04 | 19% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.09 | 19% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 40% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.00 | 28% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.00 | 21% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.01 | 17% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.00 | 20% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.02 | 22% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.01 | 28% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 33% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.02 | 15% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.05 | 31% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.03 | 22% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 32% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.04 | 23% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 26% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 33% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.01 | 26% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 36% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.09 | 36% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.04 | 14% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.02 | 17% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 20% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.06 | 26% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.07 | 25% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 17% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.05 | 35% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.05 | 36% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 20–22 | 0.05 | 43% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.02 | 22% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.07 | 41% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.01 | 38% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.00 | 12% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.00 | 31% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.00 | 28% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 33% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 26% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.05 | 27% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.08 | 25% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 19–17 | -0.01 | 27% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.05 | 29% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 30% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 29% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.04 | 25% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 16–12 | 0.07 | 30% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.13 | 22% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.05 | 22% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.12 | 31% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 13% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 29% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 19–15 | 0.04 | 27% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.17 | 26% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 39% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.04 | 23% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.02 | 31% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.03 | 17% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.04 | 33% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.07 | 22% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.20 | 32% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 1–4 | 0.06 | 40% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.08 | 44% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.04 | 23% | 20 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.