Clanker — CS2 Stats

76561198118335975[U:1:158070247]✓ No bans

1,274Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,750Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.8 Learning
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15739 of 24931 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate43.1%42.1%42.1%above
Shot accuracy15.9%12.9%12.1%above
Kill/death ratio1.121.000.99above
Match win rate44.7%42.9%43.9%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 3 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGClankerFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning37
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44524Last 10044%Win rateLLLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.2
Aggression3.6
Utility5.3
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 676ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning3.7
Utility5.3
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time689ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 689ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–3
132Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31161552%0.00
nukeB21101148%-0.01
infernoD134931%-0.02
dust2D102820%-0.04
overpassC94544%-0.01
anubisS75271%0.00
ancientC52340%-0.05
cache41325%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

97,016Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players
4,523Matches
44.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
43.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
10,837MVPs
1,954Hours (in match)
5,250Bombs planted
1,149Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,441
AWP8,273
P903,169
P2502,399
SCAR-202,093

Lifetime map wins

5,659inferno
4,406dust2
3,650nuke
1,544train
1,264vertigo
278bank
268cbble
217safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.9%Spray accuracy
69.5%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
676msReaction time
25.0%T opening success
30.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
9.67HE damage / grenade
7.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.0024% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0427%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0613%24 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0922%24 Aug
dust213–8-0.0116%24 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0212%24 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0416%18 Aug
cache1–13-0.0722%11 Aug
cache9–13-0.1023%10 Aug
inferno13–6-0.030%10 Aug
dust23–13-0.0922%10 Aug
ancient13–30.0233%10 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0215%10 Aug
mirage13–40.0423%9 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0425%9 Aug
anubis16–140.0117%9 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0319%7 Aug
mirage13–20.0624%7 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0921%7 Aug
cache13–100.0516%5 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0214%15 Jul
dust26–13-0.0316%15 Jul
mirage10–130.0822%15 Jul
dust26–13-0.0310%29 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0423%29 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0120%26 Jun
mirage13–80.0514%26 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0415%16 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0519%16 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0326%16 Jun
nuke13–110.0121%16 Jun
overpass7–130.0018%22 May
anubis5–13-0.097%22 May
mirage13–100.0112%11 May
cache12–120.0218%29 Apr
anubis13–50.0529%28 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0617%28 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0515%28 Apr
mirage8–130.0215%28 Apr
inferno11–130.0531%28 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0110%27 Apr
mirage13–70.0421%27 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0112%24 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0317%24 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0418%24 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0524%22 Apr
mirage13–110.008%22 Apr
mirage9–130.0119%21 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0521%21 Apr
overpass13–70.0212%21 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0216%20 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0611%20 Apr
anubis9–130.0820%19 Apr
mirage13–90.0416%17 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0319%17 Apr
overpass11–130.0419%17 Apr
overpass3–13-0.0512%16 Apr
inferno13–50.0219%16 Apr
mirage13–110.0510%12 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0426%12 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0111%12 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0019%11 Apr
overpass13–7-0.0911%11 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0321%11 Apr
nuke16–140.0017%9 Apr
mirage13–60.0524%7 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0417%7 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0617%7 Apr
dust213–6-0.0133%4 Apr
nuke10–130.0026%4 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0428%4 Apr
mirage13–110.0519%21 Mar
inferno13–90.0119%21 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0330%14 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0911%1 Mar
anubis13–80.0215%28 Feb
dust212–16-0.0518%23 Feb
nuke13–80.0221%22 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0322%16 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0619%11 Feb
mirage13–90.0323%10 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0514%10 Feb
dust28–13-0.0527%10 Feb
nuke13–100.1314%10 Feb
dust25–13-0.0933%9 Feb
anubis13–110.0215%9 Feb
overpass16–130.0010%9 Feb
dust26–13-0.0216%8 Feb
mirage13–110.0412%7 Feb
inferno14–160.0213%7 Feb
mirage15–150.0213%7 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0423%7 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0513%7 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0017%6 Feb
ancient5–13-0.119%5 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0314%4 Feb
inferno13–50.0113%1 Feb
nuke13–30.1524%1 Feb
overpass13–100.0619%31 Jan
mirage15–15-0.049%31 Jan
mirage9–130.0017%30 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →