Kim Possible — CS2 Stats

76561198117260616[U:1:156994888]

455Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,079Purple band · top ~24.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25693 of 45147 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,493 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKim PossibleFACEITLevel 7 · 1,493 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER16,079 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning56
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48511Last 10048%Win rateLLLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression7.5
Utility3.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.6
Utility3.8
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time594ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 13–2
131Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
613In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 15infernoWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2012860%-0.02
dust2B168850%0.01
anubisD1551033%-0.02
cacheS1510567%-0.00
nukeC145936%-0.01
infernoD81713%-0.04
mirageA53260%-0.02
overpass32167%-0.05
eldorado1010%-0.09
train110100%-0.03
cache_b1010%-0.04
office110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

264Matches
53%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
76.0ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3936%0.8813.7
Ancient3858%0.9515.3
Inferno3754%1.1316.2
Nuke3453%1.0414.4
Dust23142%0.9015.4
Anubis2658%0.8914.0
Overpass888%0.9212.9
Cache2100%1.1620.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
589msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
44.4%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
4.07HE damage / grenade
6.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3682 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.8724% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke14–160.0515%29 Aug
anubis3–130.039%29 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0615%23 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0621%23 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0315%22 Aug
eldorado4–9-0.0912%14 Aug
cache13–4-0.0467%6 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0324%6 Aug
ancient8–130.0120%4 Aug
nuke13–40.038%4 Aug
dust213–70.0214%4 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0616%4 Aug
mirage6–13-0.1310%4 Aug
cache13–40.0824%4 Aug
dust211–13-0.0110%2 Aug
dust214–160.0615%1 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0110%30 Jul
cache13–7-0.003%30 Jul
cache13–10-0.0221%30 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0018%30 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0118%30 Jul
anubis7–00.0130%30 Jul
dust216–120.0116%30 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0512%29 Jul
dust27–13-0.0212%28 Jul
mirage9–40.0413%28 Jul
nuke1–11-0.0311%28 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0414%27 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0123%27 Jul
cache7–13-0.0512%27 Jul
cache11–13-0.035%27 Jul
cache13–80.0211%27 Jul
cache13–80.019%18 Jul
nuke16–13-0.019%18 Jul
dust28–13-0.0119%29 Jun
ancient13–60.067%29 Jun
anubis7–130.0310%27 Jun
inferno5–13-0.055%27 Jun
nuke15–15-0.019%27 Jun
anubis3–13-0.048%27 Jun
ancient7–13-0.077%21 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0615%18 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0615%18 Jun
overpass13–9-0.024%18 Jun
cache13–10-0.0413%17 Jun
dust210–130.0119%17 Jun
cache13–110.0311%13 Jun
train13–6-0.0319%13 Jun
nuke13–110.0314%13 Jun
ancient3–13-0.1119%12 Jun
dust213–9-0.0116%12 Jun
nuke7–130.0215%12 Jun
anubis16–13-0.057%12 Jun
ancient13–30.048%9 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0414%9 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0811%7 Jun
dust213–4-0.0113%6 Jun
ancient13–50.0116%5 Jun
dust22–13-0.0116%31 May
cache11–130.0419%29 May
inferno10–130.0216%29 May
dust211–130.0014%25 May
cache11–130.0119%25 May
cache13–7-0.039%22 May
anubis13–10-0.033%22 May
cache13–9-0.0316%22 May
ancient8–5-0.048%18 May
overpass7–9-0.089%18 May
anubis13–110.0411%11 May
ancient11–13-0.0510%11 May
mirage13–10.0213%11 May
anubis4–13-0.0514%10 May
dust213–80.0316%10 May
inferno13–7-0.002%5 May
anubis10–13-0.0316%5 May
dust213–11-0.0412%5 May
ancient11–13-0.006%4 May
cache4–13-0.0217%2 May
nuke6–13-0.0820%27 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0511%27 Apr
dust213–70.0417%27 Apr
nuke8–130.0213%27 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0521%24 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0523%24 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0214%22 Apr
ancient6–130.069%22 Apr
dust27–130.008%22 Apr
cache_b10–13-0.049%22 Apr
dust213–20.0931%21 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0524%17 Apr
nuke13–2-0.0236%14 Apr
ancient13–5-0.057%14 Apr
inferno11–13-0.056%14 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0717%11 Apr
anubis2–13-0.0122%11 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0312%11 Apr
ancient13–3-0.076%11 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0219%5 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0610%5 Apr
office13–5-0.0210%2 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →