PUMA D KINQ

PUMA D KINQ — CS2 Stats

76561198117100623[U:1:156834895]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,911Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,770Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79076 of 247868 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,560 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 +183 1 Jul – 29 Sept · 37 days played
17,98821,257peak 21,2571 Jul29 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,560 +0 28 Aug – 6 Sept · 3 observations
1,5601,560peak 1,56028 Aug6 Sept
21,257Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,560Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-07-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,560
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 191 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,257 below peak (21,257)
  • +1,098 over 30 days · improving
  • +183 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches38——
Win rate55%——
K/D0.90——
Headshot %36%——

Measured 30 Aug 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,745), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate37.8%46.8%48.2%10.4% short
Shot accuracy6.6%13.0%13.3%6.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.041.061.070.03 short
Match win rate44.6%46.3%46.9%2.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPUMA D KINQFACEITLevel 8 · 1,560 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,560csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning52
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateLWLWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility5.7
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning5.2
Utility5.7
Mechanics3.3
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time557ms−122ms
first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy12.7%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 12.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 5 Aug →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 4–0 · dust2, 23 Sept →
438msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 19 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 5 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6cacheWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2411–1346%-0.01
anubisA2113–862%-0.01
infernoA169–756%-0.01
cacheC135–838%-0.00
nukeB126–650%-0.01
mirageC73–443%-0.02
ancientS65–183%-0.02
alpine—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

65,864Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
3,759Matches
44.6%Match win rate
37.8%Headshot %
6.6%Shot accuracy
6,481MVPs
1,560Hours (in match)
4,534Bombs planted
797Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,530
AWP4,473
MAC-102,809
MP91,825
P901,497

Lifetime map wins

7,024inferno
6,072dust2
5,837nuke
1,061vertigo
430train
284cbble
101office
71lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

558Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
77.1ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno11653%1.1316.5
Anubis10856%1.0815.5
Mirage9448%1.0814.8
Ancient6849%1.0015.7
Nuke5657%1.0515.7
Vertigo5342%1.0114.7
Dust24144%0.8313.4
Overpass2167%1.2415.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
65.0%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
558msReaction time
56.7%T opening success
40.7%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
10.54HE damage / grenade
8.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.8962% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–130.007%29 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0110%29 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0514%28 Sept →
cache13–90.0115%28 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.014%27 Sept →
ancient13–70.013%27 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.009%27 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.0121%27 Sept →
mirage11–130.0018%27 Sept →
cache7–130.0115%25 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.094%25 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0017%24 Sept →
nuke13–40.0218%24 Sept →
cache13–110.0916%23 Sept →
nuke13–30.0119%23 Sept →
dust24–0-0.0233%23 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0313%22 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0518%22 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0114%21 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.013%15 Sept →
anubis13–70.0417%15 Sept →
anubis8–130.0916%12 Sept →
nuke6–130.0421%12 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0717%10 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.014%8 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.003%8 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0615%6 Sept →
dust29–13-0.068%6 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0218%6 Sept →
dust213–8-0.037%6 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.027%4 Sept →
nuke5–130.017%4 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.049%4 Sept →
dust29–130.0411%3 Sept →
inferno13–90.019%3 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0414%2 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0714%30 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0112%30 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.073%30 Aug →
dust211–13-0.067%29 Aug →
inferno11–130.0021%29 Aug →
inferno13–60.0915%26 Aug →
cache15–150.0212%24 Aug →
inferno13–20.039%24 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.007%24 Aug →
anubis13–40.077%24 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0410%23 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0317%23 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0213%21 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0115%19 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.089%19 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0525%19 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0714%18 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0118%18 Aug →
dust213–100.0116%17 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.058%17 Aug →
cache2–13-0.086%16 Aug →
mirage16–120.009%16 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0111%12 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0314%12 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0010%9 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0517%7 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.067%6 Aug →
cache13–110.0022%6 Aug →
dust29–130.006%6 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0411%5 Aug →
dust213–30.0622%5 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.028%5 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0128%5 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0314%5 Aug →
dust213–10.1215%5 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0419%4 Aug →
anubis13–1-0.0019%4 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0010%4 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0520%4 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0218%2 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.019%2 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0217%2 Aug →
cache10–13-0.018%1 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0125%1 Aug →
dust215–150.0113%29 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0510%29 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0116%29 Jul →
anubis16–120.0514%25 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.1014%25 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.048%24 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.036%21 Jul →
dust211–130.016%21 Jul →
anubis13–30.0211%21 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0912%21 Jul →
inferno13–100.017%20 Jul →
mirage13–80.026%20 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0021%18 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.085%17 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0121%17 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0219%15 Jul →
nuke13–2-0.0421%15 Jul →
cache11–130.0211%11 Jul →
alpine9–13-0.0317%7 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.018%1 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.