edrastos

edrastos — CS2 Stats

GB76561198116495153[U:1:156229425]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,886Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,377Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,141Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#67861 of 259057 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,831 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,141 +1,642 7 Sept – 24 Oct · 22 days played
19,49921,560peak 21,5607 Sept24 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,831 +0 1 Sept – 15 Sept · 2 observations
1,8311,831peak 1,8311 Sept15 Sept
21,910Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,831Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,831
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 170 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 419 below peak (21,560)
  • +542 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,859 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate46.1%50.9%
Shot accuracy13.2%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.161.09
Match win rate49.4%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGedrastosFACEITLevel 10 · 1,831 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,141 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,831csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning60
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–48–6Last 10046%Win rateLLWLWLWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −6.8pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.5
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.0
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time529ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 8–13 · mirage, 29 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · dust2, 21 Jul →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 11 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 13 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 57% over 14infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2212–1055%0.02
nukeA1810–856%0.02
ancientA148–657%0.01
anubisD144–1029%-0.01
dust2B136–746%0.03
cacheC114–736%0.02
infernoD82–625%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

122,114Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players
6,031Matches
49.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players
46.1%Headshot %
13.2%Shot accuracy
16,332MVPs
2,373Hours (in match)
8,596Bombs planted
2,095Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,921nuke
4,176cbble
3,479dust2
2,465inferno
2,212train
1,282vertigo
566lake
454safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

805Matches
53%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
82.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
22Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis17858%1.1016.0
Nuke15655%1.1816.7
Ancient9645%1.1216.5
Mirage8754%1.1916.4
Overpass6356%1.2418.0
Vertigo4842%0.9215.4
Dust23358%1.0815.0
Inferno2948%1.0915.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
532msReaction time
48.6%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
7.42HE damage / grenade
6.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.0223%24 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0122%24 Oct →
mirage13–90.0616%23 Oct →
anubis9–130.0418%23 Oct →
dust213–70.0020%23 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0515%21 Oct →
dust213–50.0338%21 Oct →
dust215–150.0920%21 Oct →
cache13–60.0528%20 Oct →
anubis6–130.017%20 Oct →
cache13–70.0121%20 Oct →
ancient13–30.1327%20 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0516%19 Oct →
ancient13–90.0332%19 Oct →
nuke19–17-0.0522%19 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0338%19 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0130%19 Oct →
anubis2–70.1425%19 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0432%18 Oct →
cache1–130.0731%18 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0822%17 Oct →
nuke9–130.0016%16 Oct →
nuke13–70.1239%16 Oct →
anubis13–50.1118%14 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0338%14 Oct →
nuke6–130.0326%14 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0115%13 Oct →
dust213–80.0714%13 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0310%13 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0619%7 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.0614%7 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0320%6 Oct →
nuke7–130.0112%6 Oct →
mirage13–50.0321%30 Sept →
dust26–130.0326%30 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0545%30 Sept →
inferno5–130.0011%30 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0324%30 Sept →
dust214–160.0125%30 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0119%29 Sept →
mirage8–130.1938%29 Sept →
ancient13–70.1235%29 Sept →
mirage4–130.0817%25 Sept →
cache15–150.1428%25 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0721%25 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0525%24 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0226%24 Sept →
mirage13–80.0024%23 Sept →
mirage13–30.0317%23 Sept →
dust213–90.0024%23 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0337%19 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0518%19 Sept →
inferno13–100.0631%19 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0622%17 Sept →
nuke13–70.0924%16 Sept →
dust213–70.0925%16 Sept →
nuke11–130.0319%11 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0326%11 Sept →
mirage13–60.0628%11 Sept →
cache6–130.0126%11 Sept →
dust26–130.0017%10 Sept →
mirage13–80.0517%10 Sept →
nuke7–130.0125%10 Sept →
mirage13–90.0120%10 Sept →
inferno13–90.0520%9 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0042%9 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0521%9 Sept →
mirage15–150.0223%7 Sept →
ancient13–50.0422%7 Sept →
ancient13–70.0719%5 Sept →
nuke13–50.0614%5 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0218%5 Sept →
dust215–150.0522%5 Sept →
anubis14–160.0127%5 Sept →
mirage13–90.0617%1 Sept →
cache16–19-0.0410%1 Sept →
nuke22–20-0.0216%1 Sept →
ancient9–130.0217%31 Aug →
anubis19–160.0416%26 Aug →
mirage13–50.0725%21 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0416%21 Aug →
nuke13–100.1527%17 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0123%17 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0522%13 Aug →
anubis13–2-0.0416%13 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0318%13 Aug →
cache13–50.0430%11 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0129%6 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0229%3 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0523%3 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.1118%3 Aug →
inferno7–90.0522%23 Jul →
dust213–70.0845%21 Jul →
nuke13–70.0237%20 Jul →
ancient6–130.0322%20 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0720%20 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0623%20 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.0422%20 Jul →
cache11–130.0733%17 Jul →
nuke13–110.0022%15 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.