ezzzuks

ezzzuks — CS2 Stats

LV76561198113258240[U:1:152992512]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,365Tracked matches24%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,977Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.4 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,161Blue band · top ~48.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,161 -742 30 Jul – 21 Oct · 19 days played
10,72114,088peak 14,08830 Jul21 Oct
14,794Peak Premier in tracked matches
766Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-07-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,927 below peak (14,088)
  • -1,613 over 30 days · declining
  • -742 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,839 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate43.6%42.7%43.8%meets
Shot accuracy8.2%11.2%12.0%3.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.930.991.020.09 short
Match win rate33.2%43.9%44.7%11.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGezzzuksFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,161 · Blue bandPEAK ELO766csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning48
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–52–7Last 10041%Win rateLWLLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · −57ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 5–15 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility4.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 53% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning4.8
Utility4.7
Mechanics2.5
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time578ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 28 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–6 · dust2, 9 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · inferno, 28 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 23 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
4–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 14nukeWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C4517–2838%0.00
mirageA148–657%0.04
infernoC125–742%-0.01
nukeD92–722%0.00
ancientA95–456%-0.00
anubisC83–538%-0.01
cache—21–150%0.00
vertigo—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

112,175Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
5,839Matches
33.2%Match win rate
43.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
8.2%Shot accuracy
8,101MVPs
2,223Hours (in match)
5,266Bombs planted
913Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,559
AWP22,854
P904,249
P2502,324
SG 5532,264

Lifetime map wins

10,258dust2
4,186inferno
3,170nuke
2,019office
1,811vertigo
599train
56cbble
56lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

672Matches
47%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis15851%1.1316.1
Ancient14258%1.1716.1
Nuke9736%1.0815.7
Mirage8147%1.0014.0
Inferno6542%1.0515.2
Dust25340%1.0315.4
Vertigo5248%1.2016.4
Overpass743%1.1514.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.7%Spray accuracy
61.3%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
588msReaction time
53.5%T opening success
32.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
1.4%Flash assists
6.48HE damage / grenade
10.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.7759% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.009%24 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0117%21 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.048%21 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0620%21 Oct →
inferno13–80.0018%15 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0113%15 Oct →
mirage16–140.0419%15 Oct →
dust28–130.0219%15 Oct →
dust29–130.0319%15 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0117%15 Oct →
dust213–90.0622%15 Oct →
dust210–130.0219%15 Oct →
nuke11–130.0013%14 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0524%14 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0416%9 Oct →
dust213–110.0124%8 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0217%4 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0224%3 Oct →
dust29–130.0124%3 Oct →
dust24–130.0316%3 Oct →
dust26–130.0020%3 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0313%2 Oct →
dust28–130.0232%1 Oct →
mirage13–100.0316%27 Sept →
dust26–130.0017%27 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0411%27 Sept →
mirage14–160.0216%27 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0211%27 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.025%23 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0429%16 Sept →
dust213–30.0227%16 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0820%16 Sept →
dust213–50.0214%16 Sept →
dust27–130.0219%16 Sept →
dust213–80.0616%10 Sept →
dust210–13-0.1017%9 Sept →
dust213–60.0225%9 Sept →
dust20–6-0.1150%9 Sept →
dust210–130.0821%9 Sept →
dust213–80.0530%5 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0718%5 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0817%5 Sept →
dust211–130.0237%5 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0424%5 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0714%28 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0111%28 Aug →
dust213–110.0123%28 Aug →
inferno13–90.009%28 Aug →
nuke13–80.0322%28 Aug →
inferno13–100.0826%28 Aug →
dust213–30.1329%28 Aug →
dust213–40.0831%27 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0828%27 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0523%23 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0125%23 Aug →
dust213–70.0114%23 Aug →
mirage13–70.0740%23 Aug →
cache13–50.0221%23 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0136%23 Aug →
mirage13–10.0929%23 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0124%23 Aug →
anubis16–130.0222%22 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0020%22 Aug →
ancient9–130.0418%22 Aug →
mirage13–70.0730%22 Aug →
vertigo12–16-0.0118%20 Aug →
inferno17–19-0.0220%20 Aug →
dust211–130.0323%20 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0215%19 Aug →
inferno13–100.0114%19 Aug →
dust213–40.0021%18 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0311%16 Aug →
mirage5–130.0917%15 Aug →
dust213–30.0517%15 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0216%15 Aug →
ancient13–70.0117%15 Aug →
mirage8–130.0417%15 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.039%15 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0533%14 Aug →
mirage15–150.0522%14 Aug →
mirage13–110.0413%14 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0121%9 Aug →
nuke13–80.0316%9 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0229%9 Aug →
ancient13–40.0625%9 Aug →
dust213–160.0829%9 Aug →
dust25–130.0439%9 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0515%9 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0128%6 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0228%6 Aug →
nuke4–130.0214%3 Aug →
mirage16–130.0730%3 Aug →
dust213–30.1112%3 Aug →
mirage13–60.0910%3 Aug →
dust215–15-0.1023%3 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0812%3 Aug →
dust212–120.0123%3 Aug →
anubis15–150.0714%1 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0416%1 Aug →
nuke5–130.0122%30 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.