kiyoshi

kiyoshi — CS2 Stats

76561198113024622[U:1:152758894]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,227Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,986 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,986 → 2,986
+40Tracked matches · now 4,227
+6.7ppWin rate · 60.0% → 66.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,562 -152 20 May – 2 Jul · 3 days played
24,71425,714peak 25,71420 May2 Jul
Faceit ELO: 2,986 +0 30 Aug – 26 Sept · 6 observations
2,9862,986peak 2,98630 Aug26 Sept
25,714Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,986Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
67Days played since 2025-12-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,986
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 14 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkiyoshiFACEITLevel 10 · 2,986 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,986csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning58
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–46–1Last 10053%Win rateWWLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 430ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 445ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 453ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility6.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time478ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 514ms → last ⅓ avg 478ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–6 · warden, 11 Feb →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · anubis, 2 Mar →
359msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · ancient, 3 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 74% over 19nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2513–1252%0.01
anubisS1914–574%0.04
mirageC166–1038%0.01
infernoB137–654%0.01
nukeD93–633%0.01
dust2C73–443%0.00
cacheB63–350%0.07
overpass—43–175%0.05
warden—11–0100%0.19

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,561Matches
53%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
78.4ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient59656%1.1615.9
Anubis43854%1.1715.8
Mirage36745%1.0615.3
Nuke28759%1.2416.6
Inferno22755%1.1415.7
Dust218646%1.0615.8
Vertigo10960%1.0715.0
Overpass10856%1.1516.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.2%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
476msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
41.4%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
13.0%Flash assists
8.67HE damage / grenade
6.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5108% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–90.0321%27 Oct →
cache16–130.0218%3 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0431%3 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0034%3 Oct →
mirage13–10.046%3 Oct →
nuke5–130.029%25 Sept →
cache13–20.1228%15 Sept →
mirage13–110.0228%29 Aug →
ancient13–70.0225%27 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0131%24 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0517%23 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0717%23 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0322%23 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0222%23 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0113%22 Aug →
anubis13–10.0415%22 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0110%20 Aug →
mirage0–11-0.0219%19 Aug →
inferno16–130.0224%18 Aug →
dust213–80.0320%13 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0323%12 Aug →
anubis13–10.117%12 Aug →
ancient13–10.1439%12 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0118%11 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0324%10 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0319%8 Aug →
ancient13–60.0322%7 Aug →
anubis13–30.0523%5 Aug →
inferno13–30.1220%4 Aug →
inferno13–20.0024%30 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0228%28 Jul →
mirage13–60.0513%27 Jul →
ancient13–40.0423%21 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0733%17 Jul →
inferno7–130.0423%16 Jul →
ancient9–130.0526%16 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0112%16 Jul →
ancient13–60.0221%15 Jul →
anubis1–13-0.138%15 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0335%14 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0313%14 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0020%14 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0510%13 Jul →
dust26–130.0014%13 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0612%13 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0424%12 Jul →
ancient17–19-0.0328%12 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.055%12 Jul →
anubis16–130.0913%2 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0526%1 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0123%1 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0221%1 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0328%28 Jun →
anubis13–80.0319%20 Jun →
ancient16–120.0325%19 Jun →
mirage13–50.0727%12 Jun →
ancient13–5-0.0325%11 Jun →
ancient13–8-0.0315%11 Jun →
inferno13–40.0916%9 Jun →
mirage11–130.0421%6 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0219%6 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0215%6 Jun →
dust210–130.0224%21 May →
anubis16–140.1020%20 May →
cache9–130.0919%19 May →
cache13–30.0319%19 May →
cache14–160.0217%16 May →
cache12–120.1541%11 May →
mirage10–13-0.0629%11 May →
ancient13–80.0622%5 May →
anubis13–80.0732%4 May →
mirage11–130.0620%4 May →
ancient12–70.0513%20 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0220%19 Mar →
ancient5–130.0220%3 Mar →
overpass13–20.0618%3 Mar →
anubis4–130.1844%2 Mar →
dust213–80.0631%26 Feb →
mirage1–13-0.0823%26 Feb →
anubis13–20.0524%26 Feb →
mirage10–130.0415%13 Feb →
warden13–60.1922%11 Feb →
nuke11–130.0419%8 Feb →
overpass13–50.0229%8 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0032%8 Feb →
overpass13–30.1427%8 Feb →
inferno13–100.0227%7 Feb →
anubis16–130.0421%7 Feb →
anubis13–10.1524%4 Feb →
ancient13–20.1134%1 Feb →
nuke13–40.0820%30 Jan →
mirage13–80.0321%28 Jan →
mirage11–13-0.0111%24 Jan →
nuke13–70.0420%23 Jan →
anubis13–160.0313%20 Jan →
anubis13–60.0229%18 Jan →
overpass11–13-0.0319%4 Jan →
inferno13–100.0216%3 Jan →
mirage4–130.0237%23 Dec →
mirage13–10-0.0313%22 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.