SentraXx

SentraXx — CS2 Stats

ES76561198112936682[U:1:152670954]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,250Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,508Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,597 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,597 → 1,597
+21Tracked matches · now 1,250
−10.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 43.3%

Rating over time

1,597Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-05-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,597
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 154 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,745), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate41.6%46.8%48.2%6.6% short
Shot accuracy15.6%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.061.070.13 short
Match win rate42.4%46.3%46.9%4.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSentraXxFACEITLevel 8 · 1,597 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,597csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning57
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–51Last 10049%Win rateLWLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.4
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.7
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time580ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–10 · ancient, 16 Jul →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 9–5 · poseidon, 6 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 9–0 · inferno, 6 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 17 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
10–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 30% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2412–1250%-0.01
dust2C239–1439%-0.02
ancientD206–1430%-0.00
cacheS128–467%0.00
nukeS86–275%-0.01
overpassB63–350%0.00
anubis—32–167%0.03
inferno—21–150%-0.04
eldorado—11–0100%0.08
poseidon—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,001Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
4,081Matches
42.4%Match win rate
41.6%Headshot %
15.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9,667MVPs
1,554Hours (in match)
3,761Bombs planted
779Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,995
AWP8,054
MP91,935
MAC-101,676
Knife1,455

Lifetime map wins

4,979dust2
4,124inferno
1,456vertigo
1,158nuke
946train
602cbble
519lake
135office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,084Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
76.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage28351%0.9715.6
Ancient18348%1.0116.1
Dust217249%0.9214.7
Anubis7246%0.9315.1
Nuke4542%0.8514.3
Overpass4255%1.0915.8
Inferno3247%0.9515.8
Cache2969%1.1416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
565msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
55.1%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
8.55HE damage / grenade
11.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.9662% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0120%26 Sept →
eldorado9–70.0816%25 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.1421%25 Sept →
anubis9–130.0213%20 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0625%16 Sept →
ancient15–19-0.089%10 Sept →
inferno9–00.060%6 Sept →
nuke9–20.0116%6 Sept →
poseidon9–50.0147%6 Sept →
ancient13–110.0321%23 Aug →
ancient13–110.0422%23 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0429%23 Aug →
cache8–130.0326%22 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0218%22 Aug →
cache16–12-0.0218%21 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0322%21 Aug →
anubis13–40.0718%21 Aug →
dust25–130.0020%20 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0425%19 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0821%19 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0418%19 Aug →
nuke22–190.0816%19 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0217%18 Aug →
cache13–90.049%17 Aug →
mirage6–130.0234%17 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0521%17 Aug →
nuke13–2-0.0618%17 Aug →
ancient16–19-0.0119%30 Jul →
ancient6–130.0318%30 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0023%30 Jul →
ancient5–130.0124%29 Jul →
dust28–130.0316%28 Jul →
dust213–70.0523%28 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0326%27 Jul →
mirage13–60.0423%25 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0026%21 Jul →
dust213–100.0325%21 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0119%20 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0613%16 Jul →
ancient13–100.0930%16 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0121%15 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0221%14 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0130%14 Jul →
dust212–16-0.0615%11 Jul →
dust27–130.0441%10 Jul →
cache13–40.0437%9 Jul →
cache13–70.0233%9 Jul →
mirage13–30.0313%8 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0417%8 Jul →
ancient13–50.0313%7 Jul →
dust215–19-0.0521%6 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.049%6 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0316%5 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0220%5 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0217%5 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0426%1 Jul →
mirage16–140.0021%1 Jul →
overpass9–130.0226%30 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0620%30 Jun →
mirage2–13-0.0517%28 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.0216%14 Jun →
mirage11–130.0523%14 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.0613%14 Jun →
mirage13–20.0638%14 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0527%11 Jun →
overpass13–6-0.0518%11 Jun →
dust213–100.0416%11 Jun →
cache11–130.0225%10 Jun →
dust213–6-0.0223%10 Jun →
dust211–130.0424%10 Jun →
mirage13–80.0313%10 Jun →
mirage16–120.0422%9 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0125%9 Jun →
nuke7–130.0033%8 Jun →
ancient13–16-0.0118%8 Jun →
cache6–13-0.0311%8 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0215%7 Jun →
overpass13–60.0227%7 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0228%6 Jun →
ancient13–110.0017%6 Jun →
ancient13–100.0116%4 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.0218%3 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0016%3 Jun →
dust216–130.0228%3 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.1117%2 Jun →
dust28–13-0.068%1 Jun →
ancient8–130.0617%1 Jun →
ancient4–130.0419%28 May →
overpass9–130.0410%28 May →
ancient10–13-0.0521%27 May →
mirage8–13-0.0021%27 May →
dust29–13-0.0617%27 May →
mirage13–10-0.0215%25 May →
mirage16–120.0119%25 May →
dust28–13-0.0826%25 May →
cache13–100.0210%24 May →
overpass13–100.0325%24 May →
overpass12–16-0.0525%22 May →
cache13–8-0.0519%22 May →
mirage2–13-0.0821%22 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.