Jew jitsu (<:) — CS2 Stats

HU76561198111647667[U:1:151381939]Steam profile ↗

688Tracked matches76%Win rate2021Tracked since

3,942Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.6 StrongClutch Specialist

Premier CS Rating20,792Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#63150 of 220719 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 20,792 → 20,792

+4Tracked matches · now 688

−3.4ppWin rate · 79.3% → 75.9%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 6 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,792 +4,087 10 Aug – 14 Sept · 10 days played

21,133Peak Premier in tracked matches

41Days played since 2026-07-06

Premier CS Rating

341 below peak (21,133)
+3,858 over 30 days · improving
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,208 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-14
Purple band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

Metric	Last 7	Previous 7	Change
Matches	12	—	—
Win rate	67%	—	—
K/D	1.47	—	—
Headshot %	53%	—	—

Measured 9 Sep 2026 → 17 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,548), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 3 median	Level 4 median	vs Level 4
Headshot rate	47.0%	41.9%	42.7%	above
Shot accuracy	13.9%	12.2%	11.2%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.88	0.98	0.99	above
Match win rate	54.9%	43.3%	43.9%	above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning67

Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY67–27–6Last 10067%Win rateWWLLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 560ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 27%
Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

14–6 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 29%
Avg reaction 569ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim9.2

Utility3.9

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels4.7

Clutch8.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning6.7

Utility3.9

Mechanics8.2

Opening Duels5.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time567ms−0ms

first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms

Headshot accuracy27.5%+0.4%

first ⅓ avg 27.1% → last ⅓ avg 27.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 8–3 · dust2, 20 Jul →

55%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · ancient, 9 Aug →

391msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · office, 31 Aug →

13–0Biggest win · dust2, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak

W2Current streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 89% over 9mirageWeakest map · 57% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
office	A	41	26–15	63%	0.06
dust2	S	21	16–5	76%	0.04
inferno	S	9	8–1	89%	0.05
mirage	A	7	4–3	57%	0.03
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	0.03
nuke	A	5	3–2	60%	0.04
cache	—	4	1–3	25%	0.00
anubis	—	2	2–0	100%	0.05
eldorado	—	2	1–1	50%	0.08
italy	—	1	1–0	100%	0.14
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (57% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

150,032Lifetime kills

1.88K/D · Top 5% of Level 3 players

6,445Matches

54.9%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 3 players

47.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players

13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players

22,289MVPs

1,982Hours (in match)

2,633Bombs planted

615Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4752,154

M4A4 / M4A1-S28,762

AWP17,362

Desert Eagle13,484

P2000 / USP-S7,077

Glock-185,830

SSG 084,791

MP92,418

P902,361

Galil AR2,190

Lifetime map wins

18,984office

4,524inferno

4,225dust2

3,736italy

1,716assault

1,396militia

1,227nuke

952vertigo

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

16Matches

69%Win rate

1.84Avg K/D

103.3ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

60%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	3	100%	1.42	17.7
Mirage	3	67%	2.01	15.7
Dust2	2	50%	1.70	24.5
Nuke	1	100%	2.50	25.0
Train	1	100%	4.00	24.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.3%Headshot accuracy

36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.7%Spray accuracy

86.9%Counter-strafing

7.2°Preaim

555msReaction time

57.2%T opening success

44.3%CT opening success

0.33Enemies flashed / flash

3.2%Flash assists

8.89HE damage / grenade

4.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3255 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–4	0.14	30%	16 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.01	16%	16 Sept →
office	1–8	0.05	21%	15 Sept →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	35%	14 Sept →
office	13–11	-0.00	16%	12 Sept →
dust2	13–0	0.02	33%	12 Sept →
inferno	13–5	0.06	34%	11 Sept →
dust2	6–13	0.06	39%	11 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.05	21%	10 Sept →
office	13–9	0.09	27%	9 Sept →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	43%	7 Sept →
office	13–5	0.06	45%	7 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.00	35%	6 Sept →
anubis	13–6	0.10	23%	6 Sept →
office	13–9	0.07	21%	6 Sept →
office	9–13	0.06	33%	2 Sept →
inferno	9–7	0.14	31%	2 Sept →
nuke	9–6	0.10	26%	2 Sept →
inferno	9–7	0.03	33%	2 Sept →
office	9–13	-0.04	18%	2 Sept →
office	12–12	0.03	32%	31 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.00	20%	31 Aug →
office	13–5	0.02	26%	24 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	26%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.03	27%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.04	26%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.01	15%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.04	25%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.01	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.10	33%	23 Aug →
office	13–3	0.03	19%	23 Aug →
office	13–10	-0.01	32%	22 Aug →
office	13–9	0.08	27%	22 Aug →
office	13–2	0.05	30%	22 Aug →
office	13–4	0.09	27%	22 Aug →
office	5–13	0.08	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.01	22%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	14%	21 Aug →
office	13–7	0.01	13%	21 Aug →
office	13–3	0.05	31%	20 Aug →
office	4–13	0.02	14%	20 Aug →
office	13–11	0.14	25%	19 Aug →
office	12–12	0.11	33%	19 Aug →
office	13–1	0.06	38%	19 Aug →
office	13–1	0.20	48%	19 Aug →
office	13–3	0.09	26%	18 Aug →
office	13–9	0.07	43%	17 Aug →
office	13–5	0.05	34%	17 Aug →
office	13–4	0.03	34%	16 Aug →
office	5–13	0.02	25%	16 Aug →
office	13–7	0.02	29%	16 Aug →
office	13–10	0.04	12%	16 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.07	41%	15 Aug →
dust2	11–3	0.05	29%	15 Aug →
office	9–13	0.03	27%	15 Aug →
eldorado	9–5	0.09	38%	15 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	24%	14 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.03	32%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.14	27%	10 Aug →
office	11–13	0.03	30%	10 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.03	27%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	31%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.04	55%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	27%	9 Aug →
office	6–13	0.19	27%	9 Aug →
office	13–8	0.04	28%	3 Aug →
office	13–7	0.06	38%	3 Aug →
italy	13–4	0.14	19%	3 Aug →
office	13–3	0.15	48%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	26%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.09	26%	29 Jul →
mirage	9–2	0.05	11%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	20%	28 Jul →
ancient	5–2	-0.00	17%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.02	30%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	20%	26 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	18%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.07	27%	23 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.07	35%	23 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.03	31%	23 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.07	27%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.00	17%	22 Jul →
office	13–8	0.06	28%	22 Jul →
office	5–13	0.04	31%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.01	15%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.05	30%	21 Jul →
office	13–10	0.07	24%	20 Jul →
dust2	8–3	0.23	33%	20 Jul →
eldorado	4–9	0.07	29%	20 Jul →
ancient	14–16	0.01	26%	20 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.02	35%	16 Jul →
boulder	13–5	0.03	38%	14 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.05	24%	13 Jul →
shelter	7–13	-0.05	26%	13 Jul →
office	11–13	0.05	27%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.10	30%	8 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.06	33%	7 Jul →
office	12–12	0.08	35%	7 Jul →
office	11–13	0.09	25%	6 Jul →